| Author | Message | 
  
	|  Topic: More Eureka | 
  
	| daj95376 
 Replies: 3
 Views: 180761
 
 |  Forum: Solving techniques, and terminology   Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 3:46 pm   Subject: More Eureka | 
  
	| Correcting Dan's typos: 
 W-Wing:  (4=6)r3c5 - r3c4 = r46c4 - (6=4)r4c6  =>  r3c6,r5c5<>4
 
 | 
  
	|  Topic: Sudopedia:  Eureka notation | 
  
	| daj95376 
 Replies: 18
 Views: 607847
 
 |  Forum: Solving techniques, and terminology   Posted: Sat Nov 03, 2012 4:58 pm   Subject: Sudopedia:  Eureka notation | 
  
	| I don't see what can be Wrong! with asking a question.  Let me put it another way.  If r3c6 contains only the two candidates <35>, why on earth would you write (3-5)r3c6? 
 The Wrong! was in re ...
 | 
  
	|  Topic: Sudopedia:  Eureka notation | 
  
	| daj95376 
 Replies: 18
 Views: 607847
 
 |  Forum: Solving techniques, and terminology   Posted: Sat Nov 03, 2012 6:24 am   Subject: Sudopedia:  Eureka notation | 
  
	| Help me here: 
 (3=5)r3c6 says r3c6 is a bivalue cell.  Right?
 
 (3-5)r3c6 says what??
 
 Wrong!
 
 (3=5)r3c6 says there's a strong inference between the candidate <3> and the candidate <5& ...
 | 
  
	|  Topic: Sudopedia:  Eureka notation | 
  
	| daj95376 
 Replies: 18
 Views: 607847
 
 |  Forum: Solving techniques, and terminology   Posted: Fri Nov 02, 2012 11:13 pm   Subject: Sudopedia:  Eureka notation | 
  
	| Thanks Danny, I will try and digest your working definitions, but I'm having trouble seeing how a bivalue can be both. 
 A bivalue cell is neither a strong inference nor a weak inference. There's onl ...
 | 
  
	|  Topic: Sudopedia:  Eureka notation | 
  
	| daj95376 
 Replies: 18
 Views: 607847
 
 |  Forum: Solving techniques, and terminology   Posted: Fri Nov 02, 2012 4:44 pm   Subject: Sudopedia:  Eureka notation | 
  
	| I don't think that last sentence is very accurate. It was a failed attempt at "whimsey". Someone use to repeat the conclusion of discontinuous loops ... and I thought it was you. Sorry!
 | 
  
	|  Topic: Sudopedia:  Eureka notation | 
  
	| daj95376 
 Replies: 18
 Views: 607847
 
 |  Forum: Solving techniques, and terminology   Posted: Fri Nov 02, 2012 3:28 pm   Subject: Sudopedia:  Eureka notation | 
  
	| Here's my "working definition" of strong inference and weak inference. 
 
 
 Strong Inference: When you have two possible outcomes and you assume that one outcome isn't true, then you must  ...
 | 
  
	|  Topic: Another M I | 
  
	| daj95376 
 Replies: 6
 Views: 63095
 
 |  Forum: Other puzzles   Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2012 6:02 pm   Subject: Another M I | 
  
	| A discontinuous loop that produces eliminations in [c1] and [b7]. +--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
 |  5       469     1       |   ...
 | 
  
	|  Topic: Eureka help | 
  
	| daj95376 
 Replies: 18
 Views: 624348
 
 |  Forum: Solving techniques, and terminology   Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2012 4:41 am   Subject: Eureka help | 
  
	| I found Angus Johnson's post from 2005 here. I had forgotten his "Type 3" was for simple coloring, which we don't have in this example. Perhaps it is X-coloring, but I can't check that out r ... | 
  
	|  Topic: Eureka help | 
  
	| daj95376 
 Replies: 18
 Views: 624348
 
 |  Forum: Solving techniques, and terminology   Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2012 7:15 pm   Subject: Eureka help | 
  
	| +-------+-------+-------+ | . . . | . . . | / . . |
 | . . . | . . . | / . . |
 | . 28. | . . . | 2 . . |
 +-------+-------+-------+
 | . . . | . . . | / . . |
 | . . . | . . . | / . . |
 | . . . | . ...
 | 
  
	|  Topic: Eureka help | 
  
	| daj95376 
 Replies: 18
 Views: 624348
 
 |  Forum: Solving techniques, and terminology   Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2012 6:52 pm   Subject: Eureka help | 
  
	| [Withdrawn: I was mistaken about the specifics of AJ's Type 3 Simple Coloring.] | 
  
	|  Topic: Eureka help | 
  
	| daj95376 
 Replies: 18
 Views: 624348
 
 |  Forum: Solving techniques, and terminology   Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2012 11:34 am   Subject: Eureka help | 
  
	| [Withdrawn: I was mistaken about the specifics of AJ's Type 3 Simple Coloring.] | 
  
	|  Topic: Menneske impossible | 
  
	| daj95376 
 Replies: 9
 Views: 77151
 
 |  Forum: Other puzzles   Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 10:34 pm   Subject: Menneske impossible | 
  
	| M-Ring  C (6=7)r1c5 - r3c56 = (7-6)r3c8 = (6)r3c56 - loop  =>  r3c8<>3; r12c4<>6 
 r12c48  <39> UR Type 1.2223             <> 39   r2c4
 
 You me ...
 | 
  
	|  Topic: Eureka help | 
  
	| daj95376 
 Replies: 18
 Views: 624348
 
 |  Forum: Solving techniques, and terminology   Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 10:13 pm   Subject: Re: Eureka help | 
  
	| [Withdrawn: I was mistaken about the specifics of AJ's Type 3 Simple Coloring.] | 
  
	|  Topic: Menneske impossible | 
  
	| daj95376 
 Replies: 9
 Views: 77151
 
 |  Forum: Other puzzles   Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 4:02 pm   Subject: Menneske impossible | 
  
	| Impossible it ain't. 
 +--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
 |  267     25678   2358    |  369     67      1       |  4       35679   567     |
 |  46 ...
 | 
  
	|  Topic: Eureka help | 
  
	| daj95376 
 Replies: 18
 Views: 624348
 
 |  Forum: Solving techniques, and terminology   Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 3:33 pm   Subject: Re: Eureka help | 
  
	| [Withdrawn: I was mistaken about the specifics of AJ's Type 3 Simple Coloring.] | 
  
	|  Topic: Menneske 2038613 | 
  
	| daj95376 
 Replies: 11
 Views: 70869
 
 |  Forum: Other puzzles   Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 5:15 pm   Subject: Menneske 2038613 | 
  
	| I also used the DP 49 in boxes 258. Either r1c4 or r6c6=6 or r9c6=8. Common outcome; r4c6=6. r6c6 = 6 implies r4c6 =6?  How can that be?  They are in the same column.
 
 If r6c6=6 is false, then it's ...
 | 
  
	|  Topic: Vanhegan extreme October 5, 2012 | 
  
	| daj95376 
 Replies: 4
 Views: 35890
 
 |  Forum: Other puzzles   Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 4:13 pm   Subject: Vanhegan extreme October 5, 2012 | 
  
	| My solution is very similar to Dan's, so I looked for a totally different alternate but, after spending more than an hour, gave up. 
 Danny, if you read this I would be interested in what your progr ...
 | 
  
	|  Topic: Menneske 2897824 | 
  
	| daj95376 
 Replies: 13
 Views: 84042
 
 |  Forum: Other puzzles   Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 7:59 pm   Subject: Menneske 2897824 | 
  
	| Then, I saw we were slicing and dicing this every way possible. 
 The same reason for my post.
 | 
  
	|  Topic: Menneske 2897824 | 
  
	| daj95376 
 Replies: 13
 Views: 84042
 
 |  Forum: Other puzzles   Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 4:01 pm   Subject: Menneske 2897824 | 
  
	| Another "simple" example for using the <79>UR. (Almost the same as Keith's solution.) 
 after basics
 +-----------------------------------------------------+
 |  4    8    3    |   ...
 | 
  
	|  Topic: Vanhegan fiendish October 3, 2012 | 
  
	| daj95376 
 Replies: 5
 Views: 40154
 
 |  Forum: Other puzzles   Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 3:56 pm   Subject: Vanhegan fiendish October 3, 2012 | 
  
	| Ted, 
 Thanks! Much easier to reconstruct.
 | 
  
	|  |