View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Marty R.
Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
|
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2008 12:18 am Post subject: One from Australia |
|
|
This is the Tough from Feb. 18, 2008. An interesting one, at least to me.
Code: |
+-------+-------+-------+
| 6 . 8 | . . . | . 1 . |
| . . . | 9 . 4 | . . 8 |
| 3 . . | 7 . . | . . . |
+-------+-------+-------+
| 2 3 . | . . . | . . . |
| . . 6 | . 9 . | 2 . . |
| . . . | . . . | . 5 7 |
+-------+-------+-------+
| . . . | . . 2 | . . 9 |
| 4 . . | 1 . 8 | . . . |
| . 8 . | . . . | 1 . 5 |
+-------+-------+-------+
|
Play this puzzle online at the Daily Sudoku site |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Steve R
Joined: 24 Oct 2005 Posts: 289 Location: Birmingham, England
|
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2008 12:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, it is interesting.
This position came up:
Code: | +---------------------------------------+
| 6 79 8 | 2 35 35 | 79 1 4 |
| 15 12+5 27+1 | 9 6 4 | 35 37 8 |
| 3 45 49+5 | 7 8 1 | 59 6 2 |
-----------------------------------------
| 2 3 57 | 48 1 57 | 48 9 6 |
| 8 57 6 | 45 9 37 | 2 34 1 |
| 9 14 14 | 38 2 6 | 38 5 7 |
-----------------------------------------
| 15 6 13 | 35 47 2 | 47 8 9 |
| 4 29 59+2 | 1 57 8 | 6 27 3 |
| 7 8 23 | 6 34 9 | 1 24 5 |
+---------------------------------------+ |
The BUG+4 makes a couple of eliminations. If any of the non-BUG candidates goes into box 1, r3c2 contains 4. On the other hand, if r8c3 contains 2, r789c3 contain 1, 2 and 3 so r6c3 contains 4. Whichever applies, 4 may be eliminated from r3c3 and r6c2
This gives:
Code: | +----------------------------------------+
| 6 79 8 | 2 35 35 | 79 1 4 |
| 15 25 127 | 9 6 4 | 35 37 8 |
| 3 4 59 | 7 8 1 | 59 6 2 |
------------------------------------------
| 2 3 57 | 48 1 57 | 48 9 6 |
| 8 57 6 | 45 9 37 | 2 34 1 |
| 9 1 4 | 38 2 6 | 38 5 7 |
------------------------------------------
| 15 6 13 | 35 47 2 | 47 8 9 |
| 4 29 259 | 1 57 8 | 6 27 3 |
| 7 8 23 | 6 34 9 | 1 24 5 |
+----------------------------------------+ |
The XY-Wing for (79) pivoted on r1c2 with pincers r3c3 and r5c2 then eliminates 5 from r2c2 and r5c3, solving the puzzle.
There’s no particular reason why a BUG should not be followed by another trick but I can’t recall coming across it before.
Thanks, Marty.
Steve |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ravel
Joined: 21 Apr 2006 Posts: 536
|
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2008 1:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nice puzzle.
I found a UR, xy-wing, M-wing 34 (2 times), coloring 5, double linked w-wing 57 (1 strong link for 5, 3 strong links for 7) with transports for 5.
Finally i needed a 7-cell xy-chain (r2c7<>5) to finish off.
Ah - nice solution, Steve !
[Added:] How did you eliminate 7 from r2c2 and 9 from r3c2 ? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Steve R
Joined: 24 Oct 2005 Posts: 289 Location: Birmingham, England
|
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2008 3:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
To make the eliminations independently, you could use the XY-chains:
-7- r2c8 -3- r5c8 -4- r5c4 -5- r5c2 -7-
-9- r3c7 -5- r2c7 -3- r2c8 -7- r8c8 -2- r8c2 -9-
In practice, I doubt that this is necessary. Suppose you start from here:
Code: | +----------------------------------------+
| 6 79 8 | 2 35 35 | 79 1 4 |
| 15 12+57 27+1 | 9 6 4 | 35 37 8 |
| 3 45+9 49+5 | 7 8 1 | 59 6 2 |
------------------------------------------
| 2 3 57 | 48 1 57 | 48 9 6 |
| 8 57 6 | 45 9 37 | 2 34 1 |
| 9 14 14 | 38 2 6 | 38 5 7 |
------------------------------------------
| 15 6 13 | 35 47 2 | 47 8 9 |
| 4 29 59+2 | 1 57 8 | 6 27 3 |
| 7 8 23 | 6 34 9 | 1 24 5 |
+----------------------------------------+ |
I think you will find that any of the non-BUG candidates places 4 in r6c3.
I actually worked from a BUG+6 but simplified the diagram a little because the detail of the BUG obscured the point that caught my interest.
Steve |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marty R.
Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
|
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2008 4:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I had a couple of ERs, a UR, and XY-Wing. Then the M-Wing used once, then again after extending a pincer two more cells. But after that, I needed Medusa to finish up. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ravel
Joined: 21 Apr 2006 Posts: 536
|
Posted: Mon Apr 14, 2008 5:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Steve R wrote: | I actually worked from a BUG+6 ... | Great, never seen/tried such a thing. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|