View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
nataraj
Joined: 03 Aug 2007 Posts: 1048 Location: near Vienna, Austria
|
Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 5:51 am Post subject: July 7 V?H |
|
|
A reasonably well hidden x-wing does it
(x-wing on "7" in cols 3 and 8, removes 7 from r5c1, r8c29)
Or ... could it be ... just basics?
puzzled
-----
confirm: I did the puzzle again and no advanced techniques are needed. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
storm_norm
Joined: 18 Oct 2007 Posts: 1741
|
Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 8:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
maybe the naked triples are suppose to make people scratch their heads?? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cgordon
Joined: 04 May 2007 Posts: 769 Location: ontario, canada
|
Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 11:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
I used an x-wing on <7> to finish it off - but now after reading the other posts I'm gonna have to try again. Deja vu from last week eh !
Actually, I did enjoy this one. I thought it had the more difficult basics of a “Hard” puzzle (triples and quads). Often the VH’s are “Easy” ones with a wing thrown in. I'm not convinced this one can be done without a wing. Like Arnold - "I will be back"! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tlanglet
Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Posts: 2468 Location: Northern California Foothills
|
Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 12:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It was a "funny" experience for me. I was doing the basics, and doing more basics, when I realized that the puzzle was resolved without any advanced techniques. I assumed that I had made an incorrect but lucky move so I solved it a second time with the same result! What a "bummer"
Ted |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nataraj
Joined: 03 Aug 2007 Posts: 1048 Location: near Vienna, Austria
|
Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 12:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hm, the x-wing is there right from the beginning (well, after the hidden single 5 in r6c3 removes the third "7" in column 3), so it is hard to say when exactly I used it...
But the solution does not depend on a wing:
There are 2 naked quads 1239 row 1 and 1279 col 1.
Soon after a box/line in box 4 restricts 1 to row 5, there is a naked triple 7,8,9 in column 2 takes out 7 in r89c2, which makes r8c3=7 and the x-wing is gone... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cgordon
Joined: 04 May 2007 Posts: 769 Location: ontario, canada
|
Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 2:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My commitment was to do this like my peers - with no VH steps. My peers were right - no VH bits are needed - but it sure took me a long time to complete. And that was after cheating and looking at Nataraj's last post.
Since I originally completed this very quickly using an x-wing - there has to be a moral there somewhere. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marty R.
Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
|
Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 3:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Maybe I missed something, as basics didn't do it for me. But two URs took care of it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nataraj
Joined: 03 Aug 2007 Posts: 1048 Location: near Vienna, Austria
|
Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 4:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
cgordon wrote: | Since I originally completed this very quickly using an x-wing - there has to be a moral there somewhere. |
Same here. Moral: When you find them ... take them |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Clement
Joined: 24 Apr 2006 Posts: 1111 Location: Dar es Salaam Tanzania
|
Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 4:26 pm Post subject: Daily Sudoku: Mon 7 Jul-2008 VH |
|
|
After basic eliminations using triples, quads,lone numbers, box line intersections etc., an X-Wing with candidates of 7's appears in r6c29 and r9c29 elimianatng the 7's in the respective columns solving the puzzle. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
keith
Joined: 19 Sep 2005 Posts: 3355 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
|
Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 10:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
After placing the <5> in C3, I saw the X-wing on my first scan of the columns. That places <1> in R5C1, and you are done.
Without the X-wing:
Hidden triple <468> in R1B2. Hidden pair <78> in C8. Hidden pair <12> in c2.
keith |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cgordon
Joined: 04 May 2007 Posts: 769 Location: ontario, canada
|
Posted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 11:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Guys!!! Please acknowledge this puzzle is a HARD only. "Very Hard'" solutions are not worthy. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
keith
Joined: 19 Sep 2005 Posts: 3355 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
|
Posted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 2:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
cgordon wrote: | Guys!!! Please acknowledge this puzzle is a HARD only. "Very Hard'" solutions are not worthy. |
And here, we have a problem. If you use a very obvious "very hard" X-wing, the puzzle falls apart. If not, the solution is a long journey. Much harder, I believe.
Keith |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nataraj
Joined: 03 Aug 2007 Posts: 1048 Location: near Vienna, Austria
|
Posted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 6:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
cgordon wrote: | Guys!!! Please acknowledge this puzzle is a HARD only. "Very Hard'" solutions are not worthy. |
"not worthy" ... hm.
Not sure I want to submit to your judgement.
Neither do I agree.
Tastes differ ... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cgordon
Joined: 04 May 2007 Posts: 769 Location: ontario, canada
|
Posted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 7:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | not worthy" ... hm.
Not sure I want to submit to your judgement.
Neither do I agree. |
No, I'm absolutely right eh! You shouldn't fish with explosives and high tech. fish finders.
Simplicity = Purity = Satisfaction. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sudocraz
Joined: 28 Apr 2008 Posts: 53
|
Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2008 2:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
Neither my husband nor I had to do anything except the basics to solve this one. No x-wings or URs, nor even any bug removal. I think it was more like a hard than a very hard. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|