dailysudoku.com Forum Index dailysudoku.com
Discussion of Daily Sudoku puzzles
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Aug 30 DB

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    dailysudoku.com Forum Index -> Other puzzles
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Earl



Joined: 30 May 2007
Posts: 677
Location: Victoria, KS

PostPosted: Sat Aug 30, 2008 3:03 pm    Post subject: Aug 30 DB Reply with quote

I needed three tricks for this August 30 DB: A UR demanded a 5 in R2C4, then two xy-chains finished it. Any one-trick wonders out there?


Earl

Code:

+-------+-------+-------+
| 3 . . | 7 . . | . . . |
| . . . | . . 3 | . 2 . |
| 8 . 9 | . . . | 7 1 . |
+-------+-------+-------+
| . . 4 | 9 3 . | . . . |
| . 8 . | . . . | . 7 . |
| . . . | . 7 6 | 2 . . |
+-------+-------+-------+
| . 6 5 | . . . | 9 . 8 |
| . 4 . | 1 . . | . . . |
| . . . | . . 4 | . . 7 |
+-------+-------+-------+

Play this puzzle online at the Daily Sudoku site
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
arkietech



Joined: 31 Jul 2008
Posts: 1834
Location: Northwest Arkansas USA

PostPosted: Sat Aug 30, 2008 3:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Good puzzle! Found a ur then an xy-chain to solve it. Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Marty R.



Joined: 12 Feb 2006
Posts: 5770
Location: Rochester, NY, USA

PostPosted: Sat Aug 30, 2008 4:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

1) Hidden UR
2) Type 1 UR
3) W-Wing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
keith



Joined: 19 Sep 2005
Posts: 3355
Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA

PostPosted: Sat Aug 30, 2008 7:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

After a Type-1 UR on <25>:
Code:
+-------------+-------------+-------------+
| 3   2   6   | 7   158 18  | 458 9   45  |
| 4   1   7   | 58  9   3   | 568 2   56  |
| 8   5   9   | 46  46  2   | 7   1   3   |
+-------------+-------------+-------------+
| 2   7   4   | 9   3   158 | 56  568 156 |
| 6   8   13a | 2   14b 15  | 345 7   9   |
| 5   9   1-3 | 48c 7   6   | 2   38c 14  |
+-------------+-------------+-------------+
| 1   6   5   | 3   2   7   | 9   4   8   |
| 7   4   8   | 1   56  9   | 356 356 2   |
| 9   3   2   | 568 568 4   | 1   56  7   |
+-------------+-------------+-------------+
The two cells c act like <34>. There is thus an extended XY-wing abc that takes out <3> in R6C3 and solves the puzzle.

Keith
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ravel



Joined: 21 Apr 2006
Posts: 536

PostPosted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 12:01 pm    Post subject: Re: Aug 30 DB Reply with quote

Earl wrote:
Any one-trick wonders out there?
You could do it with a kind of extended w-wing. But i never would have looked for such a pattern.

In Keith's grid the w-wing 14 solves the puzzle.
When we spool it back before the UR we still can use it.
Code:
 *-----------------------------------------------------------*
 | 3     25    6     | 7     158   1258  | 458   9     45    |
 | 4     1     7     | 58    9     3     | 568   2     56    |
 | 8     25    9     | 46    46    25    | 7     1     3     |
 |-------------------+-------------------+-------------------|
 | 2     7     4     | 9     3    #158   | 56    568  #156   |
 | 6     8     13    | 2    @145  @15    | 3-45  7     9     |
 | 5     9     13    |-48    7     6     | 2     38   @14    |
 |-------------------+-------------------+-------------------|
 | 1     6     5     | 3     2     7     | 9     4     8     |
 | 7     4     8     | 1     56    9     | 356   356   2     |
 | 9     3     2     | 568   568   4     | 1     56    7     |
 *-----------------------------------------------------------*

The 1 in r4c6 implies 4 in r5c5 via the ALS 145 in r5c56.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
daj95376



Joined: 23 Aug 2008
Posts: 3854

PostPosted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 3:41 pm    Post subject: Re: Aug 30 DB Reply with quote

Earl wrote:
Any one-trick wonders out there?

Before UR Type 1 and Locked Candidate 2: SIN in (abcde)

Code:
 SIN: -3r5c3  1r5c3  5r5c6  4r5c5  8r6c4  3r6c8  =>  [r5c7],[r6c3]<>3
 *-----------------------------------------------------------*
 | 3     25    6     | 7     158   1258  | 458   9     45    |
 | 4     1     7     | 58    9     3     | 568   2     56    |
 | 8     25    9     | 46    46    25    | 7     1     3     |
 |-------------------+-------------------+-------------------|
 | 2     7     4     | 9     3     158   | 56    568   156   |
 | 6     8    a13    | 2    c145  b15    | 45-3  7     9     |
 | 5     9     1-3   |d48    7     6     | 2    e38    14    |
 |-------------------+-------------------+-------------------|
 | 1     6     5     | 3     2     7     | 9     4     8     |
 | 7     4     8     | 1     56    9     | 356   356   2     |
 | 9     3     2     | 568   568   4     | 1     56    7     |
 *-----------------------------------------------------------*

After UR Type 1 and Locked Candidate 2: XY-Chain in (acde)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cgordon



Joined: 04 May 2007
Posts: 769
Location: ontario, canada

PostPosted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 8:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
The two cells c act like <34>. There is thus an extended XY-wing abc that takes out <3> in R6C3 and solves the puzzle.


I understand extended XY-wings (are they now also called xy-chains?). But for the life of me I can't see how "The two cells c act like <34>."

Actually I don't wanna know - it's all far too abstruse and esoteric. Good words eh!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
tlanglet



Joined: 17 Oct 2007
Posts: 2468
Location: Northern California Foothills

PostPosted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 9:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

keith wrote:
The two cells c act like <34>. There is thus an extended XY-wing abc that takes out <3> in R6C3 and solves the puzzle.


I thought I understood pseudo-cells in UR situations; basically they are confined to the row/column/box that contained it. In this situation, the digits <3> & <4> are in r6 but boxes <6> & <5> respectively. Is the pseudo-cell <34> visible in all three boxes (4,5,6)? If so, please provide the logical process to support this.

Ted
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Asellus



Joined: 05 Jun 2007
Posts: 865
Location: Sonoma County, CA, USA

PostPosted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 11:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ted,

They are a pseudo {34} because they are in peer bivalue cells with a common third digit. In this case, the <8>s happen to be conjugate, but that doesn't matter. All that matters is that the <8>s are weakly linked, which causes the <3> and <4> to be strongly linked, as they would be if they were a bivalue pair:
(3=8)cell_A - (8=4)cell_B
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Asellus



Joined: 05 Jun 2007
Posts: 865
Location: Sonoma County, CA, USA

PostPosted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 11:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Danny,

I recognize your one-step method as an ALS elimination (and a nice one), but what does "SIN" stand for?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
daj95376



Joined: 23 Aug 2008
Posts: 3854

PostPosted: Mon Sep 01, 2008 12:24 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Asellus wrote:
Danny,

I recognize your one-step method as an ALS elimination (and a nice one), but what does "SIN" stand for?

SIN: Single Implication Network

It's like a chain, except side-effect eliminations are allowed to affect cells later in the implication stream. It always ends in a contradiction, forcing the initial assumption to be false. In this case, the contradiction is [r6c3]=EMPTY. However, I felt the conjugate relationship on <3> was more important, and skipped listing the contradiction.

http://www.sudoku.com/boards/viewtopic.php?t=2859
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Asellus



Joined: 05 Jun 2007
Posts: 865
Location: Sonoma County, CA, USA

PostPosted: Tue Sep 02, 2008 2:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ouch! That other thread gave me an instant headache. It seems way overly and unnecessarily complex.

I'll stick with seeing those <3> eliminations as a 2-ALS elimination, which is, or course, just a very short ALS Chain.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    dailysudoku.com Forum Index -> Other puzzles All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group