View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Earl
Joined: 30 May 2007 Posts: 677 Location: Victoria, KS
|
Posted: Sat Aug 30, 2008 3:03 pm Post subject: Aug 30 DB |
|
|
I needed three tricks for this August 30 DB: A UR demanded a 5 in R2C4, then two xy-chains finished it. Any one-trick wonders out there?
Earl
Code: |
+-------+-------+-------+
| 3 . . | 7 . . | . . . |
| . . . | . . 3 | . 2 . |
| 8 . 9 | . . . | 7 1 . |
+-------+-------+-------+
| . . 4 | 9 3 . | . . . |
| . 8 . | . . . | . 7 . |
| . . . | . 7 6 | 2 . . |
+-------+-------+-------+
| . 6 5 | . . . | 9 . 8 |
| . 4 . | 1 . . | . . . |
| . . . | . . 4 | . . 7 |
+-------+-------+-------+
|
Play this puzzle online at the Daily Sudoku site |
|
Back to top |
|
|
arkietech
Joined: 31 Jul 2008 Posts: 1834 Location: Northwest Arkansas USA
|
Posted: Sat Aug 30, 2008 3:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Good puzzle! Found a ur then an xy-chain to solve it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marty R.
Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
|
Posted: Sat Aug 30, 2008 4:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
1) Hidden UR
2) Type 1 UR
3) W-Wing |
|
Back to top |
|
|
keith
Joined: 19 Sep 2005 Posts: 3355 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
|
Posted: Sat Aug 30, 2008 7:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
After a Type-1 UR on <25>: Code: | +-------------+-------------+-------------+
| 3 2 6 | 7 158 18 | 458 9 45 |
| 4 1 7 | 58 9 3 | 568 2 56 |
| 8 5 9 | 46 46 2 | 7 1 3 |
+-------------+-------------+-------------+
| 2 7 4 | 9 3 158 | 56 568 156 |
| 6 8 13a | 2 14b 15 | 345 7 9 |
| 5 9 1-3 | 48c 7 6 | 2 38c 14 |
+-------------+-------------+-------------+
| 1 6 5 | 3 2 7 | 9 4 8 |
| 7 4 8 | 1 56 9 | 356 356 2 |
| 9 3 2 | 568 568 4 | 1 56 7 |
+-------------+-------------+-------------+ | The two cells c act like <34>. There is thus an extended XY-wing abc that takes out <3> in R6C3 and solves the puzzle.
Keith |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ravel
Joined: 21 Apr 2006 Posts: 536
|
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 12:01 pm Post subject: Re: Aug 30 DB |
|
|
Earl wrote: | Any one-trick wonders out there? | You could do it with a kind of extended w-wing. But i never would have looked for such a pattern.
In Keith's grid the w-wing 14 solves the puzzle.
When we spool it back before the UR we still can use it.
Code: | *-----------------------------------------------------------*
| 3 25 6 | 7 158 1258 | 458 9 45 |
| 4 1 7 | 58 9 3 | 568 2 56 |
| 8 25 9 | 46 46 25 | 7 1 3 |
|-------------------+-------------------+-------------------|
| 2 7 4 | 9 3 #158 | 56 568 #156 |
| 6 8 13 | 2 @145 @15 | 3-45 7 9 |
| 5 9 13 |-48 7 6 | 2 38 @14 |
|-------------------+-------------------+-------------------|
| 1 6 5 | 3 2 7 | 9 4 8 |
| 7 4 8 | 1 56 9 | 356 356 2 |
| 9 3 2 | 568 568 4 | 1 56 7 |
*-----------------------------------------------------------* |
The 1 in r4c6 implies 4 in r5c5 via the ALS 145 in r5c56. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
daj95376
Joined: 23 Aug 2008 Posts: 3854
|
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 3:41 pm Post subject: Re: Aug 30 DB |
|
|
Earl wrote: | Any one-trick wonders out there?
|
Before UR Type 1 and Locked Candidate 2: SIN in (abcde)
Code: | SIN: -3r5c3 1r5c3 5r5c6 4r5c5 8r6c4 3r6c8 => [r5c7],[r6c3]<>3
*-----------------------------------------------------------*
| 3 25 6 | 7 158 1258 | 458 9 45 |
| 4 1 7 | 58 9 3 | 568 2 56 |
| 8 25 9 | 46 46 25 | 7 1 3 |
|-------------------+-------------------+-------------------|
| 2 7 4 | 9 3 158 | 56 568 156 |
| 6 8 a13 | 2 c145 b15 | 45-3 7 9 |
| 5 9 1-3 |d48 7 6 | 2 e38 14 |
|-------------------+-------------------+-------------------|
| 1 6 5 | 3 2 7 | 9 4 8 |
| 7 4 8 | 1 56 9 | 356 356 2 |
| 9 3 2 | 568 568 4 | 1 56 7 |
*-----------------------------------------------------------*
|
After UR Type 1 and Locked Candidate 2: XY-Chain in (acde) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cgordon
Joined: 04 May 2007 Posts: 769 Location: ontario, canada
|
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 8:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | The two cells c act like <34>. There is thus an extended XY-wing abc that takes out <3> in R6C3 and solves the puzzle. |
I understand extended XY-wings (are they now also called xy-chains?). But for the life of me I can't see how "The two cells c act like <34>."
Actually I don't wanna know - it's all far too abstruse and esoteric. Good words eh! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tlanglet
Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Posts: 2468 Location: Northern California Foothills
|
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 9:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
keith wrote: | The two cells c act like <34>. There is thus an extended XY-wing abc that takes out <3> in R6C3 and solves the puzzle.
|
I thought I understood pseudo-cells in UR situations; basically they are confined to the row/column/box that contained it. In this situation, the digits <3> & <4> are in r6 but boxes <6> & <5> respectively. Is the pseudo-cell <34> visible in all three boxes (4,5,6)? If so, please provide the logical process to support this.
Ted |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Asellus
Joined: 05 Jun 2007 Posts: 865 Location: Sonoma County, CA, USA
|
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 11:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ted,
They are a pseudo {34} because they are in peer bivalue cells with a common third digit. In this case, the <8>s happen to be conjugate, but that doesn't matter. All that matters is that the <8>s are weakly linked, which causes the <3> and <4> to be strongly linked, as they would be if they were a bivalue pair:
(3=8)cell_A - (8=4)cell_B |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Asellus
Joined: 05 Jun 2007 Posts: 865 Location: Sonoma County, CA, USA
|
Posted: Sun Aug 31, 2008 11:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Danny,
I recognize your one-step method as an ALS elimination (and a nice one), but what does "SIN" stand for? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
daj95376
Joined: 23 Aug 2008 Posts: 3854
|
Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2008 12:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Asellus wrote: | Danny,
I recognize your one-step method as an ALS elimination (and a nice one), but what does "SIN" stand for? |
SIN: Single Implication Network
It's like a chain, except side-effect eliminations are allowed to affect cells later in the implication stream. It always ends in a contradiction, forcing the initial assumption to be false. In this case, the contradiction is [r6c3]=EMPTY. However, I felt the conjugate relationship on <3> was more important, and skipped listing the contradiction.
http://www.sudoku.com/boards/viewtopic.php?t=2859 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Asellus
Joined: 05 Jun 2007 Posts: 865 Location: Sonoma County, CA, USA
|
Posted: Tue Sep 02, 2008 2:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ouch! That other thread gave me an instant headache. It seems way overly and unnecessarily complex.
I'll stick with seeing those <3> eliminations as a 2-ALS elimination, which is, or course, just a very short ALS Chain. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|