View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
storm_norm
Joined: 18 Oct 2007 Posts: 1741
|
Posted: Tue Sep 29, 2009 2:48 am Post subject: MM1540 sep-27-09 |
|
|
500104002000000300000609100000000074000503000490001000304207000108000000200306008
Code: |
+-------+-------+-------+
| 5 . . | 1 . 4 | . . 2 |
| . . . | . . . | 3 . . |
| . . . | 6 . 9 | 1 . . |
+-------+-------+-------+
| . . . | . . . | . 7 4 |
| . . . | 5 . 3 | . . . |
| 4 9 . | . . 1 | . . . |
+-------+-------+-------+
| 3 . 4 | 2 . 7 | . . . |
| 1 . 8 | . . . | . . . |
| 2 . . | 3 . 6 | . . 8 |
+-------+-------+-------+
|
open in draw/play
open in andrew stuarts online solver |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tlanglet
Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Posts: 2468 Location: Northern California Foothills
|
Posted: Tue Sep 29, 2009 3:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
After basics: Code: |
*-----------------------------------------------------------*
| 5 38 367 | 1 37 4 | 6789 689 2 |
| 9 124 1267 | 78 257 28 | 3 46 567 |
| 78 2348 237 | 6 2357 9 | 1 48 57 |
|-------------------+-------------------+-------------------|
| 68 13 13 | 9 26 28 | 5 7 4 |
| 678 28 27 | 5 4 3 | 689 1689 19 |
| 4 9 5 | 78 67 1 | 268 2368 36 |
|-------------------+-------------------+-------------------|
| 3 5 4 | 2 8 7 | 69 169 19 |
| 1 6 8 | 4 9 5 | 27 23 37 |
| 2 7 9 | 3 1 6 | 4 5 8 |
*-----------------------------------------------------------* |
The Type 3 UR 19 in r57c89 forms a subset 468 including r23c8 to delete 68 from r16c8,
This opens an ER 8 with hinge in box6 and strong link in row1 to delete 8 from r5c2,
which sets up a short chain: (7)r1c5 - (7=6)r6c5 - (6)r6c9 = (6-7)r2c9 = (7)r2c4; r1c5<>7
Ted |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Myth Jellies
Joined: 27 Jun 2006 Posts: 64
|
Posted: Tue Sep 29, 2009 4:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Code: |
*-----------------------------------------------------------*
| 5 38 367 | 1 37 4 | 6789 689 2 |
| 9 124 1267 | 78 257 28 | 3 46 567 |
| 78 2348 237 | 6 2357 9 | 1 48 57 |
|-------------------+-------------------+-------------------|
| 68 13 13 | 9 26 28 | 5 7 4 |
| 678 28 27 | 5 4 3 |*69+8 *169+8*19 |
| 4 9 5 | 78 67 1 | 268 2368 36 |
|-------------------+-------------------+-------------------|
| 3 5 4 | 2 8 7 |*69 *169 *19 |
| 1 6 8 | 4 9 5 | 27 23 37 |
| 2 7 9 | 3 1 6 | 4 5 8 |
*-----------------------------------------------------------* |
169-MUG in r57c789 forces 8 in r5c78 & eliminates 8s in r5c12 & r6c78 doing a fair amount of damage |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tlanglet
Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Posts: 2468 Location: Northern California Foothills
|
Posted: Tue Sep 29, 2009 9:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Great observation
In comparison, I picked a "daisy" while stepping on a "rose".
Ted |
|
Back to top |
|
|
arkietech
Joined: 31 Jul 2008 Posts: 1834 Location: Northwest Arkansas USA
|
Posted: Wed Sep 30, 2009 6:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Myth Jellies wrote: | Code: |
*-----------------------------------------------------------*
| 5 38 367 | 1 37 4 | 6789 689 2 |
| 9 124 1267 | 78 257 28 | 3 46 567 |
| 78 2348 237 | 6 2357 9 | 1 48 57 |
|-------------------+-------------------+-------------------|
| 68 13 13 | 9 26 28 | 5 7 4 |
| 678 28 27 | 5 4 3 |*69+8 *169+8*19 |
| 4 9 5 | 78 67 1 | 268 2368 36 |
|-------------------+-------------------+-------------------|
| 3 5 4 | 2 8 7 |*69 *169 *19 |
| 1 6 8 | 4 9 5 | 27 23 37 |
| 2 7 9 | 3 1 6 | 4 5 8 |
*-----------------------------------------------------------* |
169-MUG in r57c789 forces 8 in r5c78 & eliminates 8s in r5c12 & r6c78 doing a fair amount of damage |
Is this the correct way to code this MUG in Eureka?
MUG(169)r57c789[(8)r5c7=(8)r5c8] => r5c12<>8, r6c78<>8] |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marty R.
Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
|
Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2009 5:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
tlanglet wrote: | After basics: Code: |
*-----------------------------------------------------------*
| 5 38 367 | 1 37 4 | 6789 689 2 |
| 9 124 1267 | 78 257 28 | 3 46 567 |
| 78 2348 237 | 6 2357 9 | 1 48 57 |
|-------------------+-------------------+-------------------|
| 68 13 13 | 9 26 28 | 5 7 4 |
| 678 28 27 | 5 4 3 | 689 1689 19 |
| 4 9 5 | 78 67 1 | 268 2368 36 |
|-------------------+-------------------+-------------------|
| 3 5 4 | 2 8 7 | 69 169 19 |
| 1 6 8 | 4 9 5 | 27 23 37 |
| 2 7 9 | 3 1 6 | 4 5 8 |
*-----------------------------------------------------------* |
|
I used a couple of XY-Wings which I don't know if they were necessary. But my final step was the flightless 367 XY-Wing pivoted in r6c9. With pincer transport, the 7 is knocked out of r1c5. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Asellus
Joined: 05 Jun 2007 Posts: 865 Location: Sonoma County, CA, USA
|
Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2009 7:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
arkietech wrote: | Is this the correct way to code this MUG in Eureka?
MUG(169)r57c789[(8)r5c7=(8)r5c8] => r5c12<>8, r6c78<>8] |
I'm not aware of an officially "correct" way to notate, and even if there is such a way, my feeling is that any notation that is understandable is fine. And, I understand your notation.
If I were notating it, I would probably do it this way:
169DP[(8)r5c7=(8)r5c8]r57c789; r5c12<>8, r6c78<>8
For anything beyond a UR, I use "DP". But, I have no problem with "MUG":
169MUG[(8)r5c7=(8)r5c8]r57c789; r5c12<>8, r6c78<>8
I prefer to put the DP cell references after the "[]", by analogy with putting the cell references after the "()". But, I have no problem with putting them before the brackets. Either is clear and easy to understand. Heck! I would even accept (though I wouldn't do it myself):
169DPr57c789[r5c7(8)=r5c8(8)]; r5c12<>8, r6c78<>8
That's how liberal I am. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Myth Jellies
Joined: 27 Jun 2006 Posts: 64
|
Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2009 7:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
I agree with Asellus; there is no official way to notate, so just get the point across. Sometimes it depends if you have a picture to go with it.
In the case above, with the picture, I would probably just put
(MUG:169#6=8)r57c789 => r5c12,r6c78 <> 8
I use the pound sign (#) to indicate count when it might not be clear. In this case it would mean a total count of 6 ones, sixes, and nines in those specified cells. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
arkietech
Joined: 31 Jul 2008 Posts: 1834 Location: Northwest Arkansas USA
|
Posted: Sat Oct 03, 2009 12:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks to all
Using DP makes sense. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tlanglet
Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Posts: 2468 Location: Northern California Foothills
|
Posted: Sun Aug 29, 2010 9:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Myth Jellies wrote: | Code: |
*-----------------------------------------------------------*
| 5 38 367 | 1 37 4 | 6789 689 2 |
| 9 124 1267 | 78 257 28 | 3 46 567 |
| 78 2348 237 | 6 2357 9 | 1 48 57 |
|-------------------+-------------------+-------------------|
| 68 13 13 | 9 26 28 | 5 7 4 |
| 678 28 27 | 5 4 3 |*69+8 *169+8*19 |
| 4 9 5 | 78 67 1 | 268 2368 36 |
|-------------------+-------------------+-------------------|
| 3 5 4 | 2 8 7 |*69 *169 *19 |
| 1 6 8 | 4 9 5 | 27 23 37 |
| 2 7 9 | 3 1 6 | 4 5 8 |
*-----------------------------------------------------------* |
169-MUG in r57c789 forces 8 in r5c78 & eliminates 8s in r5c12 & r6c78 doing a fair amount of damage |
Myth, Recently I have been looking in BUG-Lite and MUG patterns. I have not been able to find anything specific about pattern definitions but I did returned to this post.
Two issues:
1. Could your MUG also be viewed as a BUG-Lite with bivalues 69, 16 & 19?
2. Viewed as either a MUG or a BUG-Lite, the only external SIS I see is r5c1=6, which solves the puzzle.
Ted |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ronk
Joined: 07 May 2006 Posts: 398
|
Posted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 1:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tlanglet wrote: | Two issues:
1. Could your MUG also be viewed as a BUG-Lite with bivalues 69, 16 & 19?
2. Viewed as either a MUG or a BUG-Lite, the only external SIS I see is r5c1=6, which solves the puzzle. |
When viewed as a BUG-Lite, it's not that simple IMO. The 9s in r5c8 and r7c8 are now extra candidates for the naked set POV, and they are also external candidates for the hidden set POV. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tlanglet
Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Posts: 2468 Location: Northern California Foothills
|
Posted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 3:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ronk wrote: | tlanglet wrote: | Two issues:
1. Could your MUG also be viewed as a BUG-Lite with bivalues 69, 16 & 19?
2. Viewed as either a MUG or a BUG-Lite, the only external SIS I see is r5c1=6, which solves the puzzle. |
When viewed as a BUG-Lite, it's not that simple IMO. The 9s in r5c8 and r7c8 are now extra candidates for the naked set POV, and they are also external candidates for the hidden set POV. |
Ron,
Once again I have demonstrated my horrible trait of jumping without looking.
Yes, it is obvious to anyone who does look that addition candidates need to be considered when the pattern is viewed as a BUG-Lite.
My only consolation is the clean solution for the MUG pattern.
Ted |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ronk
Joined: 07 May 2006 Posts: 398
|
Posted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 6:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tlanglet wrote: | Once again I have demonstrated my horrible trait of jumping without looking. |
Yesterday I did the same twice ... here and here. It must be something in the air. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|