View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
arkietech
Joined: 31 Jul 2008 Posts: 1834 Location: Northwest Arkansas USA
|
Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2012 3:01 pm Post subject: Wings - a study |
|
|
pattern game by gsf Mon Oct 11, 2010 6.7
Code: | *-----------*
|...|..1|..2|
|..6|.2.|.1.|
|.3.|9..|6..|
|---+---+---|
|..4|...|..3|
|.6.|.4.|.7.|
|5..|...|9..|
|---+---+---|
|..7|..4|.2.|
|.1.|.3.|8..|
|9..|2..|...|
*-----------* |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
SudoQ
Joined: 02 Aug 2011 Posts: 127
|
Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2012 7:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
r8c4<>5 (r7c4, r5c4, r5c9, r7c9)
/SudoQ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marty R.
Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
|
Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2012 8:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
W-Wing (58) in r5c9, r9c2, SL 5 in c8. Transport 8 from r9c2 to r7c4; r5c4<>8. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
arkietech
Joined: 31 Jul 2008 Posts: 1834 Location: Northwest Arkansas USA
|
Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2012 9:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
SudoQ wrote: | r8c4<>5 (r7c4, r5c4, r5c9, r7c9)
|
didn't see that one but I like it Code: | *-----------------------------------------------------------*
| 8 9 5 | 4 6 1 | 7 3 2 |
| 7 4 6 | 38 2 38 | 5 1 9 |
| 2 3 1 | 9 57 57 | 6 48 48 |
|-------------------+-------------------+-------------------|
| 1 7 4 | 6 58 9 | 2 58 3 |
| 3 6 9 |a58 4 2 | 1 7 b58 |
| 5 2 8 | 137 17 37 | 9 46 46 |
|-------------------+-------------------+-------------------|
| 6 58 7 |d158 9 4 | 3 2 c15 |
| 4 1 2 | 7-5 3 567 | 8 9 567 |
| 9 58 3 | 2 1578 5678 | 4 6-5 1567 |
*-----------------------------------------------------------*
(5=8)r5c4-(8=5)r5c9-(5=1)r7c9-(1=58)r57c4 => r8c4<>5 |
edited boo-boos
Last edited by arkietech on Tue Jan 31, 2012 12:20 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SudoQ
Joined: 02 Aug 2011 Posts: 127
|
Posted: Mon Jan 30, 2012 9:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thank you for your comment and the Eureka string!
/SudoQ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Luke451
Joined: 20 Apr 2008 Posts: 310 Location: Southern Northern California
|
Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2012 12:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
arkietech wrote: | SudoQ wrote: | r8c4<>5 (r7c4, r5c4, r5c9, r7c9)
|
didn't see that one but I like it Code: | *-----------------------------------------------------------*
| 8 9 5 | 4 6 1 | 7 3 2 |
| 7 4 6 | 38 2 38 | 5 1 9 |
| 2 3 1 | 9 57 57 | 6 48 48 |
|-------------------+-------------------+-------------------|
| 1 7 4 | 6 58 9 | 2 58 3 |
| 3 6 9 |a58 4 2 | 1 7 b58 |
| 5 2 8 | 137 17 37 | 9 46 46 |
|-------------------+-------------------+-------------------|
| 6 58 7 |d158 9 4 | 3 2 c15 |
| 4 1 2 | 7-5 3 567 | 8 9 567 |
| 9 58 3 | 2 1578 5678 | 4 6-5 1567 |
*-----------------------------------------------------------*
(5-8)r5c4-(8=5)r5c9-(5=1)r7c9-(1=58)r7c4 => r8c4<>5 |
|
Maybe just a wee bit simpler, this? Either way, I think you need r5c4 in your final node.
(5)r5c4=r5c9-(5=1)r7c9-(1=58)r57c4 ==>r8c4<>5 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
keith
Joined: 19 Sep 2005 Posts: 3355 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
|
Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2012 2:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
After basics: Code: | +----------------+----------------+----------------+
| 8 9 5 | 4 6 1 | 7 3 2 |
| 7 4 6 | 38 2 38 | 5 1 9 |
| 2 3 1 | 9 57 57 | 6 48 48 |
+----------------+----------------+----------------+
| 1 7 4 | 6 @58 9 | 2 #58 3 |
| 3 6 9 | 58 4 2 | 1 7 58 |
| 5 2 8 | 137 17 37 | 9 46 46 |
+----------------+----------------+----------------+
| 6 58 7 | 158 9 4 | 3 2 15 |
| 4 1 2 | 57 3 567 | 8 9 567 |
| 9 @58 3 | 2 157-8 5678 | 4 #56 1567 |
+----------------+----------------+----------------+ |
W-wing 5-8 solves it.
Keith |
|
Back to top |
|
|
keith
Joined: 19 Sep 2005 Posts: 3355 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
|
Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2012 2:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
After basics: Code: | +----------------+----------------+----------------+
| 8 9 5 | 4 6 1 | 7 3 2 |
| 7 4 6 | 38 2 38 | 5 1 9 |
| 2 3 1 | 9 57 57 | 6 48 48 |
+----------------+----------------+----------------+
| 1 7 4 | 6 58 9 | 2 @58 3 |
| 3 6 9 |#58 4 2 | 1 7 #58 |
| 5 2 8 | 137 17 37 | 9 46 46 |
+----------------+----------------+----------------+
| 6 #58 7 |#158 9 4 | 3 2 15 |
| 4 1 2 | 57 3 567 | 8 9 567 |
| 9 @58 3 | 2 1578 5678 | 4 -56 1567 |
+----------------+----------------+----------------+ | W-wing -58 solves it.
Keith |
|
Back to top |
|
|
JC Van Hay
Joined: 13 Jun 2010 Posts: 494 Location: Charleroi, Belgium
|
Posted: Tue Jan 31, 2012 8:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Another one based on the 5s and 8s ...
Code: | +------------+-------------------+----------------+
| 8 9 5 | 4 6 1 | 7 3 2 |
| 7 4 6 | 38 2 38 | 5 1 9 |
| 2 3 1 | 9 57 57 | 6 48 48 |
+------------+-------------------+----------------+
| 1 7 4 | 6 -5(8) 9 | 2 -8(5) 3 |
| 3 6 9 | 58 4 2 | 1 7 58 |
| 5 2 8 | 137 17 37 | 9 46 46 |
+------------+-------------------+----------------+
| 6 58 7 | 158 9 4 | 3 2 15 |
| 4 1 2 | 57 3 567 | 8 9 567 |
| 9 (58) 3 | 2 157(8) 5678 | 4 6(5) 1567 |
+------------+-------------------+----------------+
S Wing : 8r4c5=8r9c5-(8=5)r9c2-5r9c8=5r4c8 => -5r4c5, -8r4c8 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|