| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
keith
Joined: 19 Sep 2005
Posts: 3355
Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
|
 Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 4:04 am Post subject: Menneske 5976228 |
 |
|
| Code: | Menneske 5976228 SH(14)
+-------+-------+-------+
| . 3 . | . 7 9 | . 5 . |
| . . . | . . 5 | . . . |
| 4 . 8 | . . . | 7 . 9 |
+-------+-------+-------+
| . 2 . | . 5 7 | . 1 . |
| . . 5 | 1 . 4 | 9 . . |
| . . 1 | 9 3 . | 2 . . |
+-------+-------+-------+
| 2 . 7 | . . . | 4 . 1 |
| . . . | 7 . . | . . . |
| . 6 . | 3 9 . | . 2 . |
+-------+-------+-------+
|
Play this puzzle online at the Daily Sudoku site
Keith |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Marty R.
Joined: 12 Feb 2006
Posts: 5770
Location: Rochester, NY, USA
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 5:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
What do you think of the NFL's challenge rule?
| Code: |
+------------+----------+-----------+
| 16 3 26 | 4 7 9 | 18 5 28 |
| 179 17 29 | 68 68 5 | 13 4 23 |
| 4 5 8 | 2 1 3 | 7 6 9 |
+------------+----------+-----------+
| 3689 2 69 | 68 5 7 | 36 1 4 |
| 36 78 5 | 1 2 4 | 9 78 36 |
| 678 4 1 | 9 3 68 | 2 78 5 |
+------------+----------+-----------+
| 2 9 7 | 5 68 68 | 4 3 1 |
| 158 18 3 | 7 4 2 | 568 9 68 |
| 58 6 4 | 3 9 1 | 58 2 7 |
+------------+----------+-----------+
|
Play this puzzle online at the Daily Sudoku site
1) Type 3 UR 58 in boxes 79. A 1 or a 6 kills it. The 1 proves a 6 in r1c1 and with a transport from r8c7 to r5c9, r5c1<>6
2) Eight-cell Bug-Lite on 68 with all three killers leading to a 6 which eliminated a 6 that saw all three, but I didn't pursue it after I couldn't make it a one-stepper |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
arkietech
Joined: 31 Jul 2008
Posts: 1834
Location: Northwest Arkansas USA
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 6:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Code: | *-----------------------------------------------------------*
|b16 3 26 | 4 7 9 |a18 5 2-8 |
| 179 17 29 | 68 68 5 | 13 4 23 |
| 4 5 8 | 2 1 3 | 7 6 9 |
|-------------------+-------------------+-------------------|
| 3689 2 69 | 68 5 7 | 36 1 4 |
|c36 78 5 | 1 2 4 | 9 78 d36 |
| 678 4 1 | 9 3 68 | 2 78 5 |
|-------------------+-------------------+-------------------|
| 2 9 7 | 5 68 68 | 4 3 1 |
| 158 18 3 | 7 4 2 | 56-8 9 e68 |
| 58 6 4 | 3 9 1 | 5-8 2 7 |
*-----------------------------------------------------------*
xy-chain
(8=1)r1c7-(1=6)r1c1-(6=3)r5c1-(3=6)r5c9-(6=8)r8c9 => -8r89c7,r1c9;stte |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
keith
Joined: 19 Sep 2005
Posts: 3355
Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 7:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Marty R. wrote: | | What do you think of the NFL's challenge rule? |
It's stupid. Anyone who thinks otherwise deserves a kick in the groin.
After basics:
| Code: | +----------------+----------------+----------------+
| 16 3 26 | 4 7 9 | 18 5 28 |
| 179 17 B29 | 68 68 5 |1-3 4 A23 |
| 4 5 8 | 2 1 3 | 7 6 9 |
+----------------+----------------+----------------+
| 3689 2 C69 | 68 5 7 |D36 1 4 |
| 36 78 5 | 1 2 4 | 9 78 36 |
| 678 4 1 | 9 3 68 | 2 78 5 |
+----------------+----------------+----------------+
| 2 9 7 | 5 68 68 | 4 3 1 |
| 158 18 3 | 7 4 2 | 568 9 68 |
| 58 6 4 | 3 9 1 | 58 2 7 |
+----------------+----------------+----------------+ |
AD are pincers on 3.
Marty, I am pretty sure someone will call this a wing of some flavor.
Keith |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
storm_norm
Joined: 18 Oct 2007
Posts: 1741
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 10:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
agree with keith,
when the game is being decided off the field in some mystery replay booth, and not being decided by the 22 players laying it on the line every week, then we know the game has problems.
oh and I like marty's AUR.
anyways, everyone was complaining about how bad the substitute refs were while the strike was on. This provided a much wanted distraction so the league wouldn't have to answer to some of the other problems. but not so fast. NFL challenge rule front and center. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
arkietech
Joined: 31 Jul 2008
Posts: 1834
Location: Northwest Arkansas USA
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 12:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| keith wrote: | | I am pretty sure someone will call this a wing of some flavor. |
After checking the replay. It has four strong links and a wing has three.. 
Looks like an xy-chain. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Marty R.
Joined: 12 Feb 2006
Posts: 5770
Location: Rochester, NY, USA
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 4:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| They'll change the rule for sure, but unfortunately for Keith, they won't make it retroactive. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
keith
Joined: 19 Sep 2005
Posts: 3355
Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 4:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The thing I like about Menneskes of this level is they have may options. Here's how I actually solved it. After basics:
| Code: | +----------------+----------------+----------------+
| 16 3 26 | 4 7 9 | 18 5 28 |
| 179 17 29 | 68 68 5 | 13 4 23 |
| 4 5 8 | 2 1 3 | 7 6 9 |
+----------------+----------------+----------------+
| 3689 2 69 |B68 5 7 |#36 1 4 |
| 36 D78 5 | 1 2 4 | 9 E78 #36 |
| 678 4 1 | 9 3 6-8 | 2 F78 5 |
+----------------+----------------+----------------+
| 2 9 7 | 5 68 68 | 4 3 1 |
| 158 C18 3 | 7 4 2 | 568 9 A68 |
| 58 6 4 | 3 9 1 | 58 2 7 |
+----------------+----------------+----------------+ |
There is a Type 4 UR in R89. Also, AB are W-wing pincers on 8. With transport CDEF, it takes out 8 in R6C6.
| Code: | +-------------+-------------+-------------+
| 16 3 26 | 4 7 9 | 18 5 28 |
| 179 17 29 | 6 8 5 | 13 4 23 |
| 4 5 8 | 2 1 3 | 7 6 9 |
+-------------+-------------+-------------+
| 369 2 69 | 8 5 7 | 36 1 4 |
| 36 78 5 | 1 2 4 | 9 78 36 |
| 78 4 1 | 9 3 6 | 2 78 5 |
+-------------+-------------+-------------+
| 2 9 7 | 5 6 8 | 4 3 1 |
| 15 18 3 | 7 4 2 | 56 9 68 |
| 58 6 4 | 3 9 1 | 58 2 7 |
+-------------+-------------+-------------+ |
BUG+2 forms a pseudocell 16 in C1, solving R8C1 as 5.
Keith |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
arkietech
Joined: 31 Jul 2008
Posts: 1834
Location: Northwest Arkansas USA
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 5:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| keith wrote: | There is a Type 4 UR in R89. Also, AB are W-wing pincers on 8. With transport CDEF, it takes out 8 in R6C6.
BUG+2 forms a pseudocell 16 in C1, solving R8C1 as 5.
|
Well done! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
keith
Joined: 19 Sep 2005
Posts: 3355
Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 5:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| arkietech wrote: | | Well done! |
Thanks. I don't think it's that clever, but when solving these puzzles with pencil & paper, interesting things do come up.
Keith |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Luke451
Joined: 20 Apr 2008
Posts: 310
Location: Southern Northern California
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 8:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| keith wrote: | | Marty R. wrote: | | What do you think of the NFL's challenge rule? |
It's stupid. Anyone who thinks otherwise deserves a kick in the groin. |
In the NFL, one can no longer say that someone "deserves a kick in the groin." Correct these days is, someone "deserves a Ndamukong." |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
keith
Joined: 19 Sep 2005
Posts: 3355
Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2012 5:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Luke451 wrote: | | keith wrote: | | Marty R. wrote: | | What do you think of the NFL's challenge rule? |
It's stupid. Anyone who thinks otherwise deserves a kick in the groin. |
In the NFL, one can no longer say that someone "deserves a kick in the groin." Correct these days is, someone "deserves a Ndamukong." |
I should have said, "Anyone who thinks otherwise deserves to get Suh'd."
Keith |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
