| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
roaa
Joined: 18 Apr 2009
Posts: 112
Location: Sweden
|
 Posted: Wed May 01, 2013 8:17 am Post subject: May 1 VH |
 |
|
| The usual one: An xy-wing 235 forces r4c1=3 which solves it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
hughwill
Joined: 05 Apr 2010
Posts: 424
Location: Birmingham UK
|
| Posted: Wed May 01, 2013 8:37 am Post subject: May 1 VH |
|
|
After basics:
| Code: |
+-----------+---------+----------+
| 8 59 59 | 2 7 3 | 4 6 1 |
| 1 7 6 | 4 5 8 | 23 29 39 |
| 23 34 234 | 6 1 9 | 7 8 5 |
+-----------+---------+----------+
| 35 49 49 | 35 8 2 | 1 7 6 |
| 7 8 1 | 35 6 4 | 9 35 2 |
| 6 2 35 | 7 9 1 | 8 35 4 |
+-----------+---------+----------+
| 9 13 23 | 8 4 6 | 5 12 7 |
| 25 15 8 | 19 23 7 | 6 4 39 |
| 4 6 7 | 19 23 5 | 23 19 8 |
+-----------+---------+----------+
|
Play this puzzle online at the Daily Sudoku site
For a long time I missed the box-line in r7 removing the 3s in r7 c 1+2 so struggled until I saw it........! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
the_lock_man
Joined: 18 Dec 2012
Posts: 40
Location: Portsmarfff, UK
|
| Posted: Wed May 01, 2013 11:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Don't you just hate it when you don't see something simple like that? I used a W wing 23 in boxes 1 & 7 to remove the 2 in R3C3 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
RobertRattley
Joined: 24 Jun 2007
Posts: 118
Location: Australia
|
| Posted: Sat May 04, 2013 6:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hugh
Me too (missed the row 7 3 at first).
I also missed a similar elimination of a 9 at the top. In fact, at first I went with a harder method: an x wing of 9s!
But eventually I found that lovely, simple xy wing, no need for a preparatory x wing. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
