View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Steve R
Joined: 24 Oct 2005 Posts: 289 Location: Birmingham, England
|
Posted: Sun Jun 01, 2008 4:25 pm Post subject: Claudia’s VH+ |
|
|
This is Claudia Bach’s puzzle for 31 May 2008:
Code: | +-----------------------+
| . . . | 1 . 7 | . . . |
| . 5 . | 9 . 2 | . 4 . |
| . . 8 | . . . | 6 . . |
-------------------------
| 4 . . | . . . | . . 3 |
| . 1 5 | . 2 . | 8 7 . |
| 6 . . | . . . | . . 2 |
-------------------------
| . . 7 | . . . | 5 . . |
| . 3 . | 4 . 5 | . 9 . |
| . . . | 8 . 6 | . . . |
+-----------------------+ |
A printable version is here.
Steve |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marty R.
Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
|
Posted: Sun Jun 01, 2008 9:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I couldn't find a thing other than an XYZ-Wing. I turned to Medusa, quickly trapped a couple of numbers and the puzzle fell apart. When it falls apart so easily, it makes me wonder what I missed.
Who is Claudia Bach? I've been here over two years and never saw that name before. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ravel
Joined: 21 Apr 2006 Posts: 536
|
Posted: Mon Jun 02, 2008 10:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
When i need chains, its always the question, where to start with. I like to start from UR's, useless skyscraper/kites, xy- or w-wings, seldom xyz-wings, or simply bivalue cells or strong links (preferable on multi-candidate cells). Steve R once mentioned, that you can use the either/or of two digits, which share a cell and both have a strong link in the same unit.
E.g. in row 8 2 and 8 both have a strong link and the common cell r8c1. Since not both can be in this cell, either r8c7 must be 2 or r8c9 must be 8 (or both).
I tried to find them systematically in this puzzle (this is quickly done, when you can highlight numbers, but harder on paper) and looked, how i could use them.
Code: | *-------------------------------------------------------------*
| 239 2469 3469 | 1 68 7 | 239 238 5 |
| 137 5 136 | 9 68 2 | 137 4 178 |
| 127 29 8 | 35 345 34 | 6 12 179 |
|-------------------+--------------------+--------------------|
| 4 78 2 | 567 159 189 | 19 156 3 |
| 39 1 5 | 36 2 349 | 8 7 469 |
| 6 78 39 | 357 13459 13489 | 149 15 2 |
|-------------------+--------------------+--------------------|
| 189 469 7 | 2 139 139 | 5 1368 1468 |
| 128 3 16 | 4 17 5 | 127 9 1678 |
| 5 249 149 | 8 1379 6 | 12347 123 147 |
*-------------------------------------------------------------*
| In the deductions below i only "transformed" one of the 2 initial numbers, but of course (Medusa- or AIC-like) possibly you can find eliminations/placements, when you do it with the other number too.
r8c7=2 or r8c9=8, then r1c8=8, r1c5=6, r2c3=6, [r8c3=1, r8c5=7, r8c7=2] => r8c7=2
r3c6=4 or r3c4=5
r5c6=4 or r5c4=6
r6c8=5 or r7c8=6/r5c8=6, r5c4=3, r3c4=5 => r6c4<>5
r2c9=8 or r2c3=6, r8c3=1, r8c5=7, r8c7=2, r8c1=8 => r8c9<>8
r4c8=6 or r4c2=7
r4c8=6 or r1c8=8, r1c5=6, r2c3=6, r7c2=6 => r7c8<>6
r8c1=8 or r8c3=6, r1c2=6, r1c5=8, r2c9=8 => r8c9<>8
r4c4=7 or r4c6=8 and r6c4=7 or r6c6=8 (obviously useless) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
wapati
Joined: 10 Jun 2008 Posts: 472 Location: Brampton, Ontario, Canada.
|
Posted: Sun Jun 22, 2008 2:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Marty R. wrote: |
Who is Claudia Bach? I've been here over two years and never saw that name before. |
She posts as claudiarabia. That name you may have seen elsewhere?
Her website is this: http://sudoku-trick-kiste.de/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Asellus
Joined: 05 Jun 2007 Posts: 865 Location: Sonoma County, CA, USA
|
Posted: Sun Jun 22, 2008 11:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Two Medusa clusters, bridged on the <6>s in r1c25 (or in r28c3) quickly lead to the elimination of <6> from r7c8 and <8> from r8c9 and the puzzle falls apart.
Obviously, there are lots of AICs lurking in this grid.
I like ravel's "28" based AIC with the strong link discontinuity. The chain can be shortened:
(2)r8c7=(2-8)r8c1=(8)r8c9-(8)r2c9=(8-6)r2c5=(6)r2c3-ALS,r8c357[(6)r8c3=(2)r8c7]; r8c7=2
Essentially, there are 3 important strong inference links here:
(2)r8c7=(8)r8c9
(6)r2c3=(8)r2c9
both of which ravel pointed out, and
(6)r8c3=(2)r8c7
within the {1267} ALS of r8c357.
Because the <6>s lined up in c3 are weakly linked and the <8>s lined up in c9 are weakly linked, we have our short chain fixing r8c7 as <2>. Or, visually:
Code: | (6)r2c3 = (8)r3c9
| |
(6)r8c3 = (2)r8c7 = (8)r8c9 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|