| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
arkietech
Joined: 31 Jul 2008
Posts: 1834
Location: Northwest Arkansas USA
|
 Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2009 8:56 am Post subject: Fiendish 1230 |
 |
|
Took a couple of steps any way I went.
| Code: | *-----------*
|2.5|.13|7.4|
|...|...|...|
|6..|4..|..3|
|---+---+---|
|8..|.4.|3..|
|3..|6.7|..9|
|..7|.9.|..1|
|---+---+---|
|1..|..2|..6|
|...|...|...|
|4.3|56.|8.7|
*-----------*
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tlanglet
Joined: 17 Oct 2007
Posts: 2468
Location: Northern California Foothills
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2009 3:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dan, I also found several two-step VH type solutions.
Ted |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
storm_norm
Joined: 18 Oct 2007
Posts: 1741
|
| Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 8:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
| SOLD !! to the bidder of two steps. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
wapati
Joined: 10 Jun 2008
Posts: 472
Location: Brampton, Ontario, Canada.
|
| Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 5:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I found several ways to two step.
Thanks, Norm, for not seeing a simple one-step. 
Fun puzzle! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
keith
Joined: 19 Sep 2005
Posts: 3355
Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
|
| Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2009 8:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Is a classic remote pair an advanced move?
There is a W-wing (or an equivalent M-wing) that reduces it to a remote pair.
I count this as 1.5 steps.
Keith |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
