View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
daj95376
Joined: 23 Aug 2008 Posts: 3854
|
Posted: Fri Feb 26, 2010 10:45 pm Post subject: Puzzle 10/02/26 ___ BBDB as VH+ puzzle |
|
|
Code: | +-----------------------+
| 4 . 6 | . 1 7 | . 2 8 |
| . . . | . 3 . | . . 5 |
| 3 . . | . 8 . | 7 . . |
|-------+-------+-------|
| . . . | 3 . . | . . . |
| 6 4 3 | . . . | . 5 . |
| 7 . . | . . 4 | . 6 . |
|-------+-------+-------|
| . . 7 | . . . | 5 3 . |
| 5 . . | . 7 3 | 9 . 4 |
| 2 3 . | . . . | . 8 . |
+-----------------------+
|
Play this puzzle online at the Daily Sudoku site |
|
Back to top |
|
|
storm_norm
Joined: 18 Oct 2007 Posts: 1741
|
Posted: Sat Feb 27, 2010 3:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Code: | +----------------+----------------+------------+
| 4 59 6 | 59 1 7 | 3 2 8 |
| 8 7 29 | 469 3 269 | 1 49 5 |
| 3 1259 1259 | 459 8 259 | 7 49 6 |
+----------------+----------------+------------+
| 19 258 25 | 3 6 58 | 4 7 19 |
| 6 4 3 | 7 29 189 | 28 5 19 |
| 7 1589 159 | 1589 259 4 | 28 6 3 |
+----------------+----------------+------------+
| 19 19 7 | 68 4 68 | 5 3 2 |
| 5 6 8 | 2 7 3 | 9 1 4 |
| 2 3 4 | 159 59 159 | 6 8 7 |
+----------------+----------------+------------+ |
the following is to show that the 9 in r1c2 can't exist.
going to try and explain this so here goes.
the 49 UR in r23c48 shows that at least one of the other 9's in c4 has to be true.
so just looking at the upper most 9's, we see that they combine to form a finned x-wing in columns 3 and 4. this would eliminate the 9 in r1c2.
Code: |
+-------+---------+--------+
| .-9 . |*9 . . | . . . |
| . .*9 | 469 . . | . 49 . |
| . .*9 | 459 . . | . 49 . |
+-------+---------+--------+
| . . . | . . . | . . . |
| . . . | . . . | . . . |
| . .*9 |*9 . . | . . . |
+-------+---------+--------+
| . . . | . . . | . . . |
| . . . | . . . | . . . |
| . . . | . . . | . . . |
+-------+---------+--------+
|
if those 9's are false, this leaves the 9 in r9c4 lonely and needs somewhere to go. preferably around box 1... hint hint...
aha.. we see a 59 cell in r9c5
then take a look at the 5's in column 6. one of those 5's has to be true.
so via the 59 cell in r9c5 we get this diagram
Code: |
+-----------+----------+--------+
| . 59 . | 59 . . | . . . |
| . . 29 | 469 . . | . 49 . |
| . . | 459 . 5 | . 49 . |
+-----------+----------+--------+
| . . 25 | . . 5 | . . . |
| . . . | . . . | . . . |
| . . | . . | . . . |
+-----------+----------+--------+
| . . . | . . . | . . . |
| . . . | . . . | . . . |
| . . . | 9 59 5 | . . . |
+-----------+----------+--------+
|
Code: | (9)r9c4 - (9=5)r9c5 - (5)r9c6
||
(5)r4c6 - (5=2)r4c3 - (2=9)r2c3
||
(5)r3c6 - (5)r1c4 = (5)r1c2 |
so all outs to the UR are accounted for and put it all together.
AUR elimination on the UR49 r23c48 ===> r1c2 <> 9
Code: | (9)r1c4
||
(9)r6c4 - (9)r4c3 = (9)r23c3
||
(9)r9c4 - (9=5)r9c5 - (5)r9c6
||
(5)r4c6 - (5=2)r4c3 - (2=9)r2c3
||
(5)r3c6 - (5)r1c4 = (5)r1c2 |
notice that after I draw it up in xsudo it finds some other eliminations including the fact that the UR 49 is typically used as a type 4 which would already eliminate the 9's in r23c4. again, the main idea was to eliminate the 9 in r1c2, which blasts a hole in it.
leaves w-wing {2,5} r4c6 <> 5 to clean up the mess. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tlanglet
Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Posts: 2468 Location: Northern California Foothills
|
Posted: Sat Feb 27, 2010 3:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Four steps
Quote: | xy-wing 2-59 with vertex in r2c3,
xyz-wing 459 inr3c4, which sets up a
xy-wing -258 with vertex in r4c6,
coloring 9
|
Ted |
|
Back to top |
|
|
arkietech
Joined: 31 Jul 2008 Posts: 1834 Location: Northwest Arkansas USA
|
Posted: Sat Feb 27, 2010 7:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Three steps Code: | xyz 459
w-wing 25
*--------------------------------------------------*
| 4 59 6 | 59 1 7 | 3 2 8 |
| 8 7 29 | 6 3 29 | 1 4 5 |
| 3 125 125 | 4 8 25 | 7 9 6 |
|----------------+----------------+----------------|
| 19 25 25 | 3 6 8 | 4 7 19 |
| 6 4 3 | 7 2 19 | 8 5 19 |
| 7 8 19 | 159 59 4 | 2 6 3 |
|----------------+----------------+----------------|
| 19 19 7 | 8 4 6 | 5 3 2 |
| 5 6 8 | 2 7 3 | 9 1 4 |
| 2 3 4 | 159 59 159 | 6 8 7 |
*--------------------------------------------------*
(9)r1c4 = r2c6 - (9=1)r5c6 - r6c4 = (1-9)r6c3 = r2c3; r1c2,r2c6<>9
|
Danny did I find another m-wing 19? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
daj95376
Joined: 23 Aug 2008 Posts: 3854
|
Posted: Sat Feb 27, 2010 7:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
arkietech wrote: | Danny did I find another m-wing 19? |
No, a gM-Wing and a W-Wing have three strong links and two values (for starters). Your chain has four strong links. Still, a nice find!
Regards, Danny
Last edited by daj95376 on Sun Feb 28, 2010 6:10 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marty R.
Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
|
Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 5:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I used my typical hodgepodge of moves, including X, XYZ, UR, W, multi- and simple coloring. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|