Author |
Message |
Topic: More Eureka |
daj95376
Replies: 3
Views: 84426
|
Forum: Solving techniques, and terminology Posted: Sun Nov 04, 2012 3:46 pm Subject: More Eureka |
Correcting Dan's typos:
W-Wing: (4=6)r3c5 - r3c4 = r46c4 - (6=4)r4c6 => r3c6,r5c5<>4
|
Topic: Sudopedia: Eureka notation |
daj95376
Replies: 18
Views: 280048
|
Forum: Solving techniques, and terminology Posted: Sat Nov 03, 2012 4:58 pm Subject: Sudopedia: Eureka notation |
I don't see what can be Wrong! with asking a question. Let me put it another way. If r3c6 contains only the two candidates <35>, why on earth would you write (3-5)r3c6?
The Wrong! was in re ... |
Topic: Sudopedia: Eureka notation |
daj95376
Replies: 18
Views: 280048
|
Forum: Solving techniques, and terminology Posted: Sat Nov 03, 2012 6:24 am Subject: Sudopedia: Eureka notation |
Help me here:
(3=5)r3c6 says r3c6 is a bivalue cell. Right?
(3-5)r3c6 says what??
Wrong!
(3=5)r3c6 says there's a strong inference between the candidate <3> and the candidate <5& ... |
Topic: Sudopedia: Eureka notation |
daj95376
Replies: 18
Views: 280048
|
Forum: Solving techniques, and terminology Posted: Fri Nov 02, 2012 11:13 pm Subject: Sudopedia: Eureka notation |
Thanks Danny, I will try and digest your working definitions, but I'm having trouble seeing how a bivalue can be both.
A bivalue cell is neither a strong inference nor a weak inference. There's onl ... |
Topic: Sudopedia: Eureka notation |
daj95376
Replies: 18
Views: 280048
|
Forum: Solving techniques, and terminology Posted: Fri Nov 02, 2012 4:44 pm Subject: Sudopedia: Eureka notation |
I don't think that last sentence is very accurate.
It was a failed attempt at "whimsey". Someone use to repeat the conclusion of discontinuous loops ... and I thought it was you. Sorry! |
Topic: Sudopedia: Eureka notation |
daj95376
Replies: 18
Views: 280048
|
Forum: Solving techniques, and terminology Posted: Fri Nov 02, 2012 3:28 pm Subject: Sudopedia: Eureka notation |
Here's my "working definition" of strong inference and weak inference.
Strong Inference: When you have two possible outcomes and you assume that one outcome isn't true, then you must ... |
Topic: Another M I |
daj95376
Replies: 6
Views: 49937
|
Forum: Other puzzles Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2012 6:02 pm Subject: Another M I |
A discontinuous loop that produces eliminations in [c1] and [b7].
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| 5 469 1 | ... |
Topic: Eureka help |
daj95376
Replies: 18
Views: 308451
|
Forum: Solving techniques, and terminology Posted: Thu Nov 01, 2012 4:41 am Subject: Eureka help |
I found Angus Johnson's post from 2005 here. I had forgotten his "Type 3" was for simple coloring, which we don't have in this example. Perhaps it is X-coloring, but I can't check that out r ... |
Topic: Eureka help |
daj95376
Replies: 18
Views: 308451
|
Forum: Solving techniques, and terminology Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2012 7:15 pm Subject: Eureka help |
+-------+-------+-------+
| . . . | . . . | / . . |
| . . . | . . . | / . . |
| . 28. | . . . | 2 . . |
+-------+-------+-------+
| . . . | . . . | / . . |
| . . . | . . . | / . . |
| . . . | . ... |
Topic: Eureka help |
daj95376
Replies: 18
Views: 308451
|
Forum: Solving techniques, and terminology Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2012 6:52 pm Subject: Eureka help |
[Withdrawn: I was mistaken about the specifics of AJ's Type 3 Simple Coloring.] |
Topic: Eureka help |
daj95376
Replies: 18
Views: 308451
|
Forum: Solving techniques, and terminology Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2012 11:34 am Subject: Eureka help |
[Withdrawn: I was mistaken about the specifics of AJ's Type 3 Simple Coloring.] |
Topic: Menneske impossible |
daj95376
Replies: 9
Views: 60783
|
Forum: Other puzzles Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 10:34 pm Subject: Menneske impossible |
M-Ring C (6=7)r1c5 - r3c56 = (7-6)r3c8 = (6)r3c56 - loop => r3c8<>3; r12c4<>6
r12c48 <39> UR Type 1.2223 <> 39 r2c4
You me ... |
Topic: Eureka help |
daj95376
Replies: 18
Views: 308451
|
Forum: Solving techniques, and terminology Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 10:13 pm Subject: Re: Eureka help |
[Withdrawn: I was mistaken about the specifics of AJ's Type 3 Simple Coloring.] |
Topic: Menneske impossible |
daj95376
Replies: 9
Views: 60783
|
Forum: Other puzzles Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 4:02 pm Subject: Menneske impossible |
Impossible it ain't.
+--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| 267 25678 2358 | 369 67 1 | 4 35679 567 |
| 46 ... |
Topic: Eureka help |
daj95376
Replies: 18
Views: 308451
|
Forum: Solving techniques, and terminology Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 3:33 pm Subject: Re: Eureka help |
[Withdrawn: I was mistaken about the specifics of AJ's Type 3 Simple Coloring.] |
Topic: Menneske 2038613 |
daj95376
Replies: 11
Views: 55413
|
Forum: Other puzzles Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2012 5:15 pm Subject: Menneske 2038613 |
I also used the DP 49 in boxes 258. Either r1c4 or r6c6=6 or r9c6=8. Common outcome; r4c6=6.
r6c6 = 6 implies r4c6 =6? How can that be? They are in the same column.
If r6c6=6 is false, then it's ... |
Topic: Vanhegan extreme October 5, 2012 |
daj95376
Replies: 4
Views: 28257
|
Forum: Other puzzles Posted: Tue Oct 09, 2012 4:13 pm Subject: Vanhegan extreme October 5, 2012 |
My solution is very similar to Dan's, so I looked for a totally different alternate but, after spending more than an hour, gave up.
Danny, if you read this I would be interested in what your progr ... |
Topic: Menneske 2897824 |
daj95376
Replies: 13
Views: 65745
|
Forum: Other puzzles Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 7:59 pm Subject: Menneske 2897824 |
Then, I saw we were slicing and dicing this every way possible.
The same reason for my post. |
Topic: Menneske 2897824 |
daj95376
Replies: 13
Views: 65745
|
Forum: Other puzzles Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 4:01 pm Subject: Menneske 2897824 |
Another "simple" example for using the <79>UR. (Almost the same as Keith's solution.)
after basics
+-----------------------------------------------------+
| 4 8 3 | ... |
Topic: Vanhegan fiendish October 3, 2012 |
daj95376
Replies: 5
Views: 31649
|
Forum: Other puzzles Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 3:56 pm Subject: Vanhegan fiendish October 3, 2012 |
Ted,
Thanks! Much easier to reconstruct. |
|