View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
keith
Joined: 19 Sep 2005 Posts: 3355 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
|
Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 4:41 pm Post subject: Another creative remote pair |
|
|
Code: | Puzzle: MM022908
+-------+-------+-------+
| . . . | . 6 2 | . . 5 |
| . . . | . 9 . | . 4 . |
| . 2 . | 1 . 5 | . 7 . |
+-------+-------+-------+
| 4 . . | 9 . . | . . . |
| . 6 7 | . . . | 2 3 . |
| . . . | . . 3 | . . 7 |
+-------+-------+-------+
| . 5 . | 2 . 6 | . 1 . |
| . 9 . | . 1 . | . . . |
| 6 . . | 7 8 . | . . . |
+-------+-------+-------+ |
Enjoy! Keith
(It is the competition puzzle from http://www.sudoku.org.uk ) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Earl
Joined: 30 May 2007 Posts: 677 Location: Victoria, KS
|
Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 5:21 pm Post subject: pairs |
|
|
Swordfish 8, skyscraper 9.
Earl |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ravel
Joined: 21 Apr 2006 Posts: 536
|
Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 6:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Wow, you look for swordfish before skyscraper (which alone solves it) ?
Of course in the moment i prefer the remote pair solution |
|
Back to top |
|
|
keith
Joined: 19 Sep 2005 Posts: 3355 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
|
Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 6:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ravel wrote: | Of course in the moment i prefer the remote pair solution |
After basics:
Code: | +----------------+----------------+----------------+
|13-8-9 7 4 | 38 6 2 | 138 89c 5 |
| 1358 18 56 | 38 9 7 | 1368 4 2 |
| 38 2 69 | 1 4 5 | 38 7 69 |
+----------------+----------------+----------------+
| 4 3 2 | 9 7 18 | 68 5 16 |
| 89a 6 7 | 4 5 18 | 2 3 19 |
| 1589 18 59 | 6 2 3 | 4 89b 7 |
+----------------+----------------+----------------+
| 7 5 8 | 2 3 6 | 9 1 4 |
| 2 9 3 | 5 1 4 | 7 6 8 |
| 6 4 1 | 7 8 9 | 5 2 3 |
+----------------+----------------+----------------+
|
a and b must have the same value (they share the same unsolved peers. R6C123). Thus a and c are a remote pair, and you can take out <89> in R1C1.
Keith |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nataraj
Joined: 03 Aug 2007 Posts: 1048 Location: near Vienna, Austria
|
Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 6:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ravel wrote: | Wow, you look for swordfish before skyscraper (which alone solves it) ? |
Maybe check 8 before checking 9?
I know I do, unless I happen to spot something real obvious
The remote pair solution is, of course, very elegant, even if it has that faint touch of (xy-)chains (and even grouped not quite xy-chains, for that matter), doesn't it ? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
keith
Joined: 19 Sep 2005 Posts: 3355 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
|
Posted: Sun Mar 02, 2008 9:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
nataraj wrote: | ravel wrote: | Wow, you look for swordfish before skyscraper (which alone solves it) ? |
Maybe check 8 before checking 9?
I know I do, unless I happen to spot something real obvious
The remote pair solution is, of course, very elegant, even if it has that faint touch of (xy-)chains (and even grouped not quite xy-chains, for that matter), doesn't it ? |
Nataraj,
With pencil and paper, I look for opportunities in the cells with the fewest unsolved candidates. With software, I might look through 1 - 9 in that order.
I don't think the remote pair has a "faint touch". It follows on the discussion we have been having about W-wings, M-wings, etc. Of course, it all comes down to finding chains by recognizing a pattern. Which is, simply, a systematic way to find chains.
Pretty cool and, in my mind, absolutely legal.
Keith |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|