View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Earl
Joined: 30 May 2007 Posts: 677 Location: Victoria, KS
|
Posted: Sat Sep 13, 2008 12:54 pm Post subject: Sept 13 DB |
|
|
The Sept 13 DB has many paths. Here is one: x-wing (9), w-wing (35), skyscraper (5). Any single shots out there?
Earl
Code: |
+-------+-------+-------+
| . . 6 | . . . | . . 2 |
| 5 . . | . 7 2 | 9 8 4 |
| . . . | 1 . . | . . . |
+-------+-------+-------+
| . . 5 | . 2 . | 3 . . |
| 4 8 . | . . . | . 2 1 |
| . . 2 | . 9 . | 8 . . |
+-------+-------+-------+
| . . . | . . 6 | . . . |
| 6 2 1 | 7 5 . | . . 3 |
| 8 . . | . . . | 1 . . |
+-------+-------+-------+
|
Play this puzzle online at the Daily Sudoku site |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tlanglet
Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Posts: 2468 Location: Northern California Foothills
|
Posted: Sat Sep 13, 2008 1:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My first pass was also a three-stepper:
a finned x-wing (or kite) on <5>
the x-wing on <9>
and a <357> xy-wing finished it for me.
Ted |
|
Back to top |
|
|
keith
Joined: 19 Sep 2005 Posts: 3355 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
|
Posted: Sat Sep 13, 2008 3:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
After basics: Code: | +----------------+----------------+----------------+
| 79 4 6 | 359 8 359 | 57 1 2 |
| 5 1 3 | 6 7 2 | 9 8 4 |
| 2 79 8 | 1 4 59 | 6 3 57 |
+----------------+----------------+----------------+
| 17 67 5 | 8 2 147 | 3 467 9 |
| 4 8 9 | 35 6 357 | 57 2 1 |
| 137 367 2 | 45 9 1457 | 8 4567 567 |
+----------------+----------------+----------------+
| 39 359 47 | 49 1 6 | 2 57 8 |
| 6 2 1 | 7 5 8 | 4 9 3 |
| 8 59 47 | 2 3 49 | 1 567 567 |
+----------------+----------------+----------------+ | The X-wing on <9> reveals a W-wing <35> that reveals a classic remote pair <57> that solves it.
Is a remote pair an "advanced" move? Can I at least claim a 2.5 stepper?
Keith |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tlanglet
Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Posts: 2468 Location: Northern California Foothills
|
Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 12:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
keith wrote: |
Is a remote pair an "advanced" move? Can I at least claim a 2.5 stepper?
Keith |
If it is not in my definition of "basics", I call it a "stepper".
Ted |
|
Back to top |
|
|
keith
Joined: 19 Sep 2005 Posts: 3355 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
|
Posted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 1:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
tlanglet wrote: | keith wrote: |
Is a remote pair an "advanced" move? Can I at least claim a 2.5 stepper?
Keith |
If it is not in my definition of "basics", I call it a "stepper".
Ted | Dang!! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|