View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
daj95376
Joined: 23 Aug 2008 Posts: 3854
|
Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2008 4:36 pm Post subject: No Rating: Puzzle CA_23 |
|
|
My solver thought it was interesting. Maybe you will too.
Code: | +-----------------------+
| 2 8 . | 3 . 9 | 1 . . |
| 9 . . | . . . | . . . |
| . . 5 | 1 . . | . 7 . |
|-------+-------+-------|
| 1 . 6 | . . . | 9 . . |
| . . . | . 4 . | . 1 . |
| 8 . . | . . 1 | . . 7 |
|-------+-------+-------|
| 7 . . | 6 . . | 8 4 . |
| . . 8 | . 7 . | 5 9 . |
| . . . | . . 5 | . . 2 |
+-----------------------+
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
arkietech
Joined: 31 Jul 2008 Posts: 1834 Location: Northwest Arkansas USA
|
Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2008 6:19 pm Post subject: Re: No Rating: Puzzle CA_23 |
|
|
daj95376 wrote: | My solver thought it was interesting. Maybe you will too.
Code: | +-----------------------+
| 2 8 . | 3 . 9 | 1 . . |
| 9 . . | . . . | . . . |
| . . 5 | 1 . . | . 7 . |
|-------+-------+-------|
| 1 . 6 | . . . | 9 . . |
| . . . | . 4 . | . 1 . |
| 8 . . | . . 1 | . . 7 |
|-------+-------+-------|
| 7 . . | 6 . . | 8 4 . |
| . . 8 | . 7 . | 5 9 . |
| . . . | . . 5 | . . 2 |
+-----------------------+
|
|
Needed a ur and a xy-chain to solve it. Anyone find a 1-stepper? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tlanglet
Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Posts: 2468 Location: Northern California Foothills
|
Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2008 8:20 pm Post subject: Re: No Rating: Puzzle CA_23 |
|
|
arkietech wrote: |
Needed a ur and a xy-chain to solve it. Anyone find a 1-stepper? |
Dan, I originally used five steps but after reading your comments, I reviewed my solution but still needed three steps including a Type 2 UR and a xy-chain to finish it off.
What magic did you employ?
Ted |
|
Back to top |
|
|
daj95376
Joined: 23 Aug 2008 Posts: 3854
|
Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2008 8:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
All three puzzles can be completed with an XY-Chain, but there's an alternative that's not a UR. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
arkietech
Joined: 31 Jul 2008 Posts: 1834 Location: Northwest Arkansas USA
|
Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2008 9:11 pm Post subject: Re: No Rating: Puzzle CA_23 |
|
|
tlanglet wrote: | What magic did you employ?
|
Code: | *--------------------------------------------------*
| 2 8 7 | 3 56 9 | 1 56 4 |
| 9 *36 1 | 47 25 47 |*236 28 358 |
| 4 *36 5 | 1 28 268 |*236 7 9 |
|----------------+----------------+----------------|
| 1 4 6 | 257 238 278 | 9 28 358 |
| 5 7 39 | 29 4 268 | 36-2 1 38 |
| 8 2 39 | 59 36 1 | 4 56 7 |
|----------------+----------------+----------------|
| 7 5 2 | 6 9 3 | 8 4 1 |
| 3 1 8 | 24 7 24 | 5 9 6 |
| 6 9 4 | 8 1 5 | 7 3 2 |
*--------------------------------------------------*
The ur
*--------------------------------------------------*
| 2 8 7 | 3 56 9 | 1 56 4 |
| 9 6 1 | 47 25 47 | 23 8 35 |
| 4 3 5 | 1 28 68 | 26 7 9 |
|----------------+----------------+----------------|
| 1 4 6 | 57 38 78 | 9 2 358 |
| 5 7 *39 | 29 4 28-6 |*36 1 38 |
| 8 2 *39 | 59 *36 1 | 4 5-6 7 |
|----------------+----------------+----------------|
| 7 5 2 | 6 9 3 | 8 4 1 |
| 3 1 8 | 24 7 24 | 5 9 6 |
| 6 9 4 | 8 1 5 | 7 3 2 |
*--------------------------------------------------*
The XY-chain
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
tlanglet
Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Posts: 2468 Location: Northern California Foothills
|
Posted: Mon Sep 15, 2008 11:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Dan, thanks for the info.
I had a different position after basics.
Code: |
*--------------------------------------------------------------------*
| 2 8 7 | 3 56 9 | 1 56 4 |
| 9 136 134 | 2457 256 2467 | 236 23568 3568 |
| 346 36 5 | 1 268 2468 | 236 7 9 |
|----------------------+----------------------+----------------------|
| 1 4 6 | 2578 2358 278 | 9 2358 358 |
| 5 7 239 | 289 4 268 | 236 1 368 |
| 8 239 239 | 259 23569 1 | 4 2356 7 |
|----------------------+----------------------+----------------------|
| 7 5 1239 | 6 19 23 | 8 4 13 |
| 36 1236 8 | 24 7 234 | 5 9 136 |
| 346 1369 1349 | 89 189 5 | 7 36 2 | |
I reached the code posted by you only after using a x-wing <6> in r16c58. Then I had the same UR <36> and xy-chain (in this case a w-wing <36> with strong link <3> in col3) as you posted. Actually, the UR had additional deletions but they were not helpful.
Ted
Edit: Correction made: w-wing strong link on <3>, not <9> as originally posted. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|