View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
storm_norm
Joined: 18 Oct 2007 Posts: 1741
|
Posted: Fri Jan 02, 2009 8:47 am Post subject: vanhegan extreme jan 2 |
|
|
Code: |
+-------+-------+-------+
| . . . | 2 6 9 | . . . |
| 7 . 9 | . 4 . | 3 . 2 |
| . . 2 | . . . | 4 . . |
+-------+-------+-------+
| . 7 8 | 9 1 6 | 5 2 . |
| . . 5 | . . . | 9 . . |
| . 9 6 | 5 2 3 | 8 7 . |
+-------+-------+-------+
| . . 7 | . . . | 6 . . |
| 3 . 4 | . 9 . | 1 . 7 |
| . . . | 4 8 7 | . . . |
+-------+-------+-------+
|
Play this puzzle online at the Daily Sudoku site |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cgordon
Joined: 04 May 2007 Posts: 769 Location: ontario, canada
|
Posted: Fri Jan 02, 2009 5:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There are Ers with extended pincers (I think that’s the term) using <8> in C2 and the extra pincers in B2 and B9 to remove <8> from R3C9. That leads to another Er on <8>, an x-wing and an xy wing. Though I never find the extended pincer thing satisfying – seems too close to trial and error. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Asellus
Joined: 05 Jun 2007 Posts: 865 Location: Sonoma County, CA, USA
|
Posted: Fri Jan 02, 2009 9:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Craig,
Your first elimination is also a Finned X-Wing in r17. And, your ER path can also be seen as multi-coloring, with the weak link in r2.
I can't find the second ER on <8>. However, there is a 56 W-Wing with conjugate <6>s in r2 that eliminates <5> from r9c9 and solves the puzzle. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marty R.
Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
|
Posted: Sat Jan 03, 2009 12:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
I used W-Wings on two different pairs of 58 cells which led to a BUG+1 pattern. However, there was also available an XY-Wing Chain, 58-56-56-56-68. I would assume the latter overlaps Asellus' W-Wing. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|