View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
wapati
Joined: 10 Jun 2008 Posts: 472 Location: Brampton, Ontario, Canada.
|
Posted: Thu Feb 05, 2009 3:36 pm Post subject: Big finny fish. |
|
|
This one is a 2 big-step or a 5-step advanced.
I see a finned jellyfish and a sashimi swordfish.
Advanced players may see an x, xy, xyz, and 2 W-wings.
Code: | . . 8|. 5 1|. . .
7 . 6|3 . .|. . .
. 3 .|6 . 4|. 7 .
-----+-----+-----
. 1 .|. . .|. 8 9
. . 5|. . .|6 . .
6 8 .|. . .|. 3 .
-----+-----+-----
. 4 .|1 . 3|. 6 .
. . .|. . 6|7 . 2
. . .|5 7 .|1 . . |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
daj95376
Joined: 23 Aug 2008 Posts: 3854
|
Posted: Thu Feb 05, 2009 6:39 pm Post subject: Re: Big finny fish. |
|
|
wapati wrote: | This one is a 2 big-step or a 5-step advanced.
I see a finned jellyfish and a sashimi swordfish.
Advanced players may see an x, xy, xyz, and 2 W-wings.
|
You might wish to review how many of the highlighted steps you needed before getting to the finned Jellyfish and Sashimi Swordfish. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
wapati
Joined: 10 Jun 2008 Posts: 472 Location: Brampton, Ontario, Canada.
|
Posted: Thu Feb 05, 2009 6:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Here is my first step after easy stuff, a finned jelly.
The fins are marked "#".
Code: | .------------------.------------------.------------------.
| 4 29 8 | 7 5 1 | 3 29 6 |
| 7 259 6 | 3 289 29 | 2489 1259 14 |
| 159 3 19 | 6 *289 4 |*289 7 58 |
:------------------+------------------+------------------:
|*23 1 #234 |*24 6 7 | 5 8 9 |
| 9-2 7 5 | 249 3 8 | 6 12 14 |
| 6 8 #249 |*249 1 5 |*24 3 7 |
:------------------+------------------+------------------:
|*259 4 7 | 1 *29 3 | 89 6 58 |
| 13 59 13 | 8 4 6 | 7 59 2 |
| 8 6 29 | 5 7 29 | 1 4 3 |
'------------------'------------------'------------------' |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
daj95376
Joined: 23 Aug 2008 Posts: 3854
|
Posted: Thu Feb 05, 2009 7:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
My oversight and my apologies.
I stopped at ...
Code: | finned Franken Swordfish r37b6\c157 => [r5c1]<>2
+--------------------------------------------------------------+
| 4 29 8 | 7 5 1 | 3 29 6 |
| 7 259 6 | 3 289 29 | 2489 1259 14 |
| 159 3 19 | 6 *289 4 | *289 7 58 |
|--------------------+--------------------+--------------------|
| 23 1 234 | 24 6 7 | 5 8 9 |
| 9-2 7 5 | 249 3 8 | 6 #12 14 |
| 6 8 249 | 249 1 5 | *24 3 7 |
|--------------------+--------------------+--------------------|
| *259 4 7 | 1 *29 3 | 89 6 58 |
| 13 59 13 | 8 4 6 | 7 59 2 |
| 8 6 29 | 5 7 29 | 1 4 3 |
+--------------------------------------------------------------+
# 47 eliminations remain
|
... and missed the finned Jellyfish for the same elimination. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ronk
Joined: 07 May 2006 Posts: 398
|
Posted: Thu Feb 05, 2009 10:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
daj95376 wrote: | finned Franken Swordfish r37b6\c157 => [r5c1]<>2 |
With only one fish group candidate (occupied vertex) in cover column c1, this is sashimi. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
storm_norm
Joined: 18 Oct 2007 Posts: 1741
|
Posted: Sat Feb 07, 2009 3:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
i'd like to try some UR inferences with this one. not sure if this is the correct way to look at these.
Code: | .------------------.------------------.------------------.
| 4 29 8 | 7 5 1 | 3 29 6 |
| 7 259 6 | 3 2[89] 29 |24[89] 1259 14 |
| 159 3 19 | 6 2[89] 4 |2[89] 7 58 |
:------------------+------------------+------------------:
| 23 1 234 | 24 6 7 | 5 8 9 |
| 29 7 5 | 249 3 8 | 6 12 14 |
| 6 8 249 | 249 1 5 | 24 3 7 |
:------------------+------------------+------------------:
|25-9 4 7 | 1 *29 3 |*89 6 58 |
| 13 *59 13 | 8 4 6 | 7 *59 2 |
| 8 6 29 | 5 7 2-9 | 1 4 3 |
'------------------'------------------'------------------' |
first of all, if the 2's in r23c5 are not true, then you get the UR{8,9}r23c57. then, in order to avoid the deadly pattern, both the 8 and the 9 in r7c7 cannot both be false or that would force the deadly pattern to exist.
so the inference can be made on the 2's in r23c5 AND both the 8 and the 9 in r7c7 because both can't be false.
inference made is... UR89[(2)r23c5 = (9)r7c7]
and
UR89[(2)r23c5 = (8)r7c7]
now, the first one can be used in this manner
(9=2)r7c5 - UR89[(2)r23c5 = (9)r7c7]; r7c1 <> 9
once that 9 in eliminated...
the second one
(9=2)r7c5 - UR89[(2)r23c5 = (8)r7c7] - (8=5)r7c9 - (5)r8c8 = (5-9)r8c2 = (9)r9c3; r9c6 <> 9
that would solve it.
I'd like to know if my thoughts are correct on these.
the reason I feel its a fluke because the real inference should be written like
UR89[(2)r23c5 = (8=9)r7c7]
right? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Asellus
Joined: 05 Jun 2007 Posts: 865 Location: Sonoma County, CA, USA
|
Posted: Sat Feb 07, 2009 9:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Norm,
I'm afraid I can't follow you.
Quote: | then, in order to avoid the deadly pattern, both the 8 and the 9 in r7c7 cannot both be false |
Well, actually, the <8> and <9> in r7c7 cannot both be false because it's a bivalue cell. A potential UR somewhere has nothing to do with it. In fact, the existence of that 89 bivalue destroys your potential 89 UR. So, your reasoning is circular.
I can't see any useful UR exploits in the grid. But, maybe someone else can. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
storm_norm
Joined: 18 Oct 2007 Posts: 1741
|
Posted: Sat Feb 07, 2009 3:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Asellus wrote: | Norm,
I'm afraid I can't follow you.
Quote: | then, in order to avoid the deadly pattern, both the 8 and the 9 in r7c7 cannot both be false |
Well, actually, the <8> and <9> in r7c7 cannot both be false because it's a bivalue cell. A potential UR somewhere has nothing to do with it. In fact, the existence of that 89 bivalue destroys your potential 89 UR. So, your reasoning is circular.
I can't see any useful UR exploits in the grid. But, maybe someone else can. |
ohhh,
I guess that was some big dreaming. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|