View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
keith
Joined: 19 Sep 2005 Posts: 3355 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
|
Posted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 3:48 pm Post subject: Another Menneske, with a tough first step! |
|
|
Code: | Puzzle: M6798876sh(17)
+-------+-------+-------+
| . . . | . 8 5 | 7 . . |
| . . . | . . . | . . . |
| . 3 9 | 6 . . | . 4 . |
+-------+-------+-------+
| . 6 . | . . . | . 3 . |
| 5 . . | . . . | 2 . . |
| 3 9 . | . 7 . | . . 4 |
+-------+-------+-------+
| . 2 . | . . 3 | . . . |
| . . . | 7 . . | . 1 9 |
| 6 . 8 | . . 4 | . . 5 |
+-------+-------+-------+ |
Keith |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marty R.
Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
|
Posted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Two steps.
Quote: | Finned X-Wing on 8 exposed a W-Wing on 12. The latter created locked candidates on 1 which finished it off |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
keith
Joined: 19 Sep 2005 Posts: 3355 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
|
Posted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Marty R. wrote: | Two steps.
Quote: | Finned X-Wing on 8 exposed a W-Wing on 12. The latter created locked candidates on 1 which finished it off |
|
This is from Multi-step Marty My solution is much more complicated!
Keith |
|
Back to top |
|
|
keith
Joined: 19 Sep 2005 Posts: 3355 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
|
Posted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Marty,
That is very elegant!
Keith |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DonM
Joined: 15 Sep 2009 Posts: 51
|
Posted: Sun Oct 18, 2009 9:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Keith, what is the starting point for this 1st step? Is it the SSTS position? There are the usual singles and whatnot from the position above. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
keith
Joined: 19 Sep 2005 Posts: 3355 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
|
Posted: Mon Oct 19, 2009 12:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
Don,
After basics, I get here: Code: | +-------------------+-------------------+-------------------+
| 12 14 6 | 1234 8 5 | 7 9 123 |
| 1278 148 5 | 12349 12349 1279 | 168 68 12368 |
| 1278 3 9 | 6 12 127 | 5 4 128 |
+-------------------+-------------------+-------------------+
| 18 6 47 | 12458 1245 128 | 9 3 178 |
| 5 18 47 | 13489 13469 1689 | 2 678 1678 |
| 3 9 2 | 18 7 168 | 168 5 4 |
+-------------------+-------------------+-------------------+
| 9 2 1 | 58 56 3 | 4 678 678 |
| 4 5 3 | 7 26 268 | 68 1 9 |
| 6 7 8 | 19 19 4 | 3 2 5 |
+-------------------+-------------------+-------------------+ | By first step, I meant, after basics.
I will post my solution in a few minutes.
Keith |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marty R.
Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
|
Posted: Mon Oct 19, 2009 12:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | That is very elegant! |
Thank you. Keep in mind the old saying, "Even a blind pig finds an acorn once in a while." |
|
Back to top |
|
|
keith
Joined: 19 Sep 2005 Posts: 3355 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
|
Posted: Mon Oct 19, 2009 1:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
Code: | +-------------------+-------------------+-------------------+
| 12 14 6 |-1234 8 5 | 7 9 123 |
| 1278 148 5 |-12349 -1-2349 1279| 168 68 12368 |
| 1278 3 9 | 6 12a 127 | 5 4 128 |
+-------------------+-------------------+-------------------+
| 18 6 47 |-1245-8 -1-245 128 | 9 3 178 |
| 5 18 47 |-134-89 -134-69 1689| 2 678 1678 |
| 3 9 2 | 18d 7 168 | 168 5 4 |
+-------------------+-------------------+-------------------+
| 9 2 1 | 58e 56e 3 | 4 678 678 |
| 4 5 3 | 7 26f 2-68 | 68 1 9 |
| 6 7 8 | 19c 19b 4 | 3 2 5 |
+-------------------+-------------------+-------------------+ |
abcdef..a is an XY-loop. a and f are pincers of an XY-chain, but since they are in the same house, they make a reversible loop. Any two adjacent cells in the chain are pincers in their common candidate. Therefore, you can make the eliminations shown.
Maybe my notation in the diagram is not entirely correct, but it should show:
Quote: |
One of R3C5 and R8C5 must be <2>.
One of R8C5 and R7C5 must be <6>.
One of R7C5 and R7C4 must be <5>.
One of R7C4 and R6C4 must be <8>.
One of R6C4 and R9C4 must be <1>.
One of R9C4 and R9C5 must be <9>.
One of R9C5 and R3C5 must be <1>.
Thus:
R2C5 - cannot contain <2> because of R3C5 and R8C5.
R4C5 - cannot contain <2> because of R3C5 and R8C5.
R8C6 - cannot contain <6> because of R8C5 and R7C5.
R5C5 - cannot contain <6> because of R8C5 and R7C5.
R4C4 - cannot contain <8> because of R7C4 and R6C4.
R5C4 - cannot contain <8> because of R7C4 and R6C4.
R1C4 - cannot contain <1> because of R6C4 and R9C4.
R2C4 - cannot contain <1> because of R6C4 and R9C4.
R4C4 - cannot contain <1> because of R6C4 and R9C4.
R5C4 - cannot contain <1> because of R6C4 and R9C4.
R2C5 - cannot contain <1> because of R9C5 and R3C5.
R4C5 - cannot contain <1> because of R9C5 and R3C5.
R5C5 - cannot contain <1> because of R9C5 and R3C5.
|
Leading to here: Code: | +-------------------+-------------------+-------------------+
| 12 14 6 | 234 8 5 | 7 9 123 |
| 1278 148 5 | 2349 349 1279 | 168 68 12368 |
| 1278 3 9 | 6 12 127 | 5 4 128 |
+-------------------+-------------------+-------------------+
| 18 6 47 | 245 45 128 | 9 3 178 |
| 5 18 47 | 349 349 1689 | 2 678 1678 |
| 3 9 2 | 18 7 168 | 168 5 4 |
+-------------------+-------------------+-------------------+
| 9 2 1 | 58 56 3 | 4 678 678 |
| 4 5 3 | 7 26 28 | 68 1 9 |
| 6 7 8 | 19 19 4 | 3 2 5 |
+-------------------+-------------------+-------------------+ | which still has a few advanced steps to a solution.
What amazes me is that Marty's finned 8 X-wing is still in the above grid, and is a completely different path. Here it is: Code: | +-------------------+-------------------+-------------------+
| 12 14 6 | 234 8 5 | 7 9 123 |
| 1278 148 5 | 2349 349 1279 | 168 68 12368 |
| 1278 3 9 | 6 12 127 | 5 4 128 |
+-------------------+-------------------+-------------------+
| 18 6 47 | 245 45 12-8 | 9 3 178 |
| 5 18 47 | 349 349 16-89 | 2 678 1678 |
| 3 9 2 | 18# 7 168@ | 168@ 5 4 |
+-------------------+-------------------+-------------------+
| 9 2 1 | 58 56 3 | 4 678 678 |
| 4 5 3 | 7 26 28@ | 68@ 1 9 |
| 6 7 8 | 19 19 4 | 3 2 5 |
+-------------------+-------------------+-------------------+ |
Either the X-wing @ is true, or # is true. Either way, R45C6 cannot be 8.
Keith
Last edited by keith on Mon Oct 19, 2009 1:07 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
keith
Joined: 19 Sep 2005 Posts: 3355 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
|
Posted: Mon Oct 19, 2009 1:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Marty R. wrote: | Quote: | That is very elegant! |
Thank you. Keep in mind the old saying, "Even a blind pig finds an acorn once in a while." |
In this case, more like a truffle!
Keith |
|
Back to top |
|
|
daj95376
Joined: 23 Aug 2008 Posts: 3854
|
Posted: Mon Oct 19, 2009 1:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
After basics and Marty's excellent finned X-Wing, there's his W-Wing and this XY-Chain:
Code: | XY-Chain a-b-c-d-e
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| 12 14 6 | 1234 8 5 | 7 9 123 |
| 1278 148 5 | 12349 12349 1279 | 168 68 12368 |
| 1278 3 9 | 6 12 127 | 5 4 128 |
|-----------------------+-----------------------+-----------------------|
| 18 6 47 | 12458 145-2 a12 | 9 3 178 |
| 5 18 47 | 13489 13469 169 | 2 678 167 |
| 3 9 2 | b18 7 168 | 168 5 4 |
|-----------------------+-----------------------+-----------------------|
| 9 2 1 | c58 d56 3 | 4 678 678 |
| 4 5 3 | 7 e26 68-2 | 68 1 9 |
| 6 7 8 | 19 19 4 | 3 2 5 |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
# 83 eliminations remain |
In addition, there's the shortest SIN (Single Implication Network) that I recall seeing in some time:
Code: | [r4c6]=1
/ \
[r8c6]=2 => contradiction; => [r8c6]<>2
\ /
[r6c6]=8 [r6c4]=1
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| 12 14 6 | 1234 8 5 | 7 9 123 |
| 1278 148 5 | 12349 12349 1279 | 168 68 12368 |
| 1278 3 9 | 6 12 127 | 5 4 128 |
|-----------------------+-----------------------+-----------------------|
| 18 6 47 | 12458 1245 12 | 9 3 178 |
| 5 18 47 | 13489 13469 169 | 2 678 167 |
| 3 9 2 | 18 7 168 | 168 5 4 |
|-----------------------+-----------------------+-----------------------|
| 9 2 1 | 58 56 3 | 4 678 678 |
| 4 5 3 | 7 26 268 | 68 1 9 |
| 6 7 8 | 19 19 4 | 3 2 5 |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
# 83 eliminations remain
|
Yes, it can be represented as a short chain, but the simplicity is lost. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DonM
Joined: 15 Sep 2009 Posts: 51
|
Posted: Mon Oct 19, 2009 10:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Code: | +-------------------+-------------------+-------------------+
| 12 14 6 | 1234 8 5 | 7 9 123 |
| 1278 148 5 | 12349 12349 1279 | 168 68 12368 |
| 1278 3 9 | 6 12 127 | 5 4 128 |
+-------------------+-------------------+-------------------+
| 18 6 47 | 12458 1245 128 | 9 3 178 |
| 5 18 47 | 13489 13469 1689 | 2 678 1678 |
| 3 9 2 | 18 7 168 | 168 5 4 |
+-------------------+-------------------+-------------------+
| 9 2 1 | 58 56 3 | 4 678 678 |
| 4 5 3 | 7 26 268 | 68 1 9 |
| 6 7 8 | 19 19 4 | 3 2 5 |
+-------------------+-------------------+-------------------+ |
Here's a 2-step pattern-solving ALS-chain alternative (rc=restricted common):
Step 1: Dual-linked ALS:
Set A(1589)r679c4 -> rc5 & rc9 -> Set B(12569)r3789c5
Elims: 1 in r1245c4, 1 in r245c5, 8 in r45c4, 2 in r24c5, 6 in r5c5
Step 2: 3-set ALS chain:
Set A(123489)r12569c4 -> rc2 -> Set B(123459)r23459c5 -> rc5 -> Set C(2568)r7c5/r8c56
Thus: r7c4<>8=5
stte |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tlanglet
Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Posts: 2468 Location: Northern California Foothills
|
Posted: Thu Oct 22, 2009 1:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
Marty R. wrote: | Two steps.
Quote: | Finned X-Wing on 8 exposed a W-Wing on 12. The latter created locked candidates on 1 which finished it off |
|
Great move Marty! I love to see those finned and Kraken solutions.
Ted |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|