View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
storm_norm
Joined: 18 Oct 2007 Posts: 1741
|
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 7:22 pm Post subject: MM 1575 11-1-09 |
|
|
001800200200060800000000030013970560000000000087035910050000090008090004002006300
Code: |
+-------+-------+-------+
| . . 1 | 8 . . | 2 . . |
| 2 . . | . 6 . | 8 . . |
| . . . | . . . | . 3 . |
+-------+-------+-------+
| . 1 3 | 9 7 . | 5 6 . |
| . . . | . . . | . . . |
| . 8 7 | . 3 5 | 9 1 . |
+-------+-------+-------+
| . 5 . | . . . | . 9 . |
| . . 8 | . 9 . | . . 4 |
| . . 2 | . . 6 | 3 . . |
+-------+-------+-------+
|
Play online
open in andrew stuarts online solver
i'd call this one tricky. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
arkietech
Joined: 31 Jul 2008 Posts: 1834 Location: Northwest Arkansas USA
|
Posted: Sun Nov 01, 2009 8:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Lots of possibilities! Code: | *--------------------------------------------------------------------*
| 3579 3679-4 1 | 8 *45 3479 | 2 457 679 |
| 2 3479 459 | 137 6 13479 | 8 457 179 |
| 8 4679 b4569 | 127 a1245 1479 | 1467 3 1679 |
|----------------------+----------------------+----------------------|
| 4 1 3 | 9 7 2 | 5 6 8 |
| 59 2 59 | 6 18 18 | 47 47 3 |
| 6 8 7 | 4 3 5 | 9 1 2 |
|----------------------+----------------------+----------------------|
| 137 5 c46 | 1237 1248 13478 | 167 9 167 |
| 137 367 8 | 5 9 137 | 167 2 4 |
| 179 *479 2 | 17 1-4 6 | 3 8 5 |
*--------------------------------------------------------------------*
(4=5)r1c5-(5)r3c5=(5-6)r3c3=(6-4)r7c3=(4)r9c2 => r1c2,r9c5<>4;
singles
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marty R.
Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
|
Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 4:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | Lots of possibilities! |
Not for me, unfortunately. I had to give up. What technique is described by the notation? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
arkietech
Joined: 31 Jul 2008 Posts: 1834 Location: Northwest Arkansas USA
|
Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 6:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Marty R. wrote: | Not for me, unfortunately. I had to give up. What technique is described by the notation? |
I don't know the technique name other than chain. Pincher 4 connected by a chain? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
daj95376
Joined: 23 Aug 2008 Posts: 3854
|
Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 6:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Code: | after Naked/Hidden Singles
*--------------------------------------------------------------------*
| 3579 34679 1 | 8 45 3479 | 2 457 679 |
| 2 3479 459 | 137 6 13479 | 8 457 179 |
| 8 4679 4569 | 127 1245 1479 | 1467 3 1679 |
|----------------------+----------------------+----------------------|
| 4 1 3 | 9 7 2 | 5 6 8 |
| 59 2 59 | 6 18 18 | 47 47 3 |
| 6 8 7 | 4 3 5 | 9 1 2 |
|----------------------+----------------------+----------------------|
| 137 5 46 | 1237 1248 13478 | 167 9 167 |
| 137 367 8 | 5 9 137 | 167 2 4 |
| 179 479 2 | 17 14 6 | 3 8 5 |
*--------------------------------------------------------------------*
|
There's a "r57c56 <18> UR Type 4 => r7c56<>1", but it doesn't contribute much. However, it does signal that another pattern might be present. This pattern doesn't have a name, but it has a short chain that I see all of the time (after my solver points it out).
Code: | SL on <8> : (8)r7c6 = (8- )r5c6
SL on <1> : ( -1)r5c6 = (1)r5c5
WL to Bivalue cell: - (1=4)r9c5
Conclusion : r7c6 <> 4
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marty R.
Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
|
Posted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 10:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I used the Type 4 in the conventional way, but as you said, it was of little help. Drawing the conclusions based on the two SL's is, I'm sorry to say, beyond my level of understanding. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|