View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
daj95376
Joined: 23 Aug 2008 Posts: 3854
|
Posted: Sun Apr 04, 2010 4:37 pm Post subject: Puzzle 10/04/04 (B) |
|
|
Code: | +-----------------------+
| 9 . 4 | 2 5 3 | . 6 . |
| . 7 6 | . . . | . 3 . |
| 5 3 . | . . 6 | . . 2 |
|-------+-------+-------|
| 7 . . | . . . | . . 6 |
| 6 . . | . . 5 | . 8 . |
| 8 . 5 | . 7 4 | . 9 . |
|-------+-------+-------|
| . . . | . . . | 3 . . |
| 4 5 . | . 3 7 | . 2 . |
| . . 7 | 5 . . | . . 8 |
+-----------------------+
|
Play this puzzle online at the Daily Sudoku site |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tlanglet
Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Posts: 2468 Location: Northern California Foothills
|
Posted: Mon Apr 05, 2010 1:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
One step which is like a xyz-wing but with additions.
Code: |
*--------------------------------------------------------------------*
| 9 18 4 | 2 5 3 | 178 6 17 |
| 2 7 6 | 1489 1489 189 | 5 3 149 |
| 5 3 18 | 7 149 6 | 1489 14 2 |
|----------------------+----------------------+----------------------|
| 7 1249 1239 | 1389 1289 1289 | 124 5 6 |
| 6 1249 1239 | 139 129 5 | 1247 8 147 |
| 8 12 5 | 6 7 4 | 12 9 3 |
|----------------------+----------------------+----------------------|
| 1 2689 289 | 489 24689 289 | 3 7 5 |
| 4 5 89 | 189 3 7 | 6 2 19 |
| 3 269 7 | 5 1269 129 | 149 14 8 |
*--------------------------------------------------------------------*
|
Look at the 149 in r2c9:
If r2c9=1; r1c79|r3c7<>1,
If r2c9=4, then r3c8=1; r1c79|r3c7<>1,
If r2c9=9, then r8c9=1, then r9c8<>1, then r3c8=1; r1c79|r3c7<>1.
Ted |
|
Back to top |
|
|
peterj
Joined: 26 Mar 2010 Posts: 974 Location: London, UK
|
Posted: Mon Apr 05, 2010 2:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Neat!
Is it vald to think of this as pincer transport? The xyz-wing (149) vertex at r2c9 with pincers at r3c8 and r8c9 would normally just take out the 1 in r1c9. But the strong link r9c8(1)=r3c8(1) extends r8c9 back into the house taking out all the other 1s?? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marty R.
Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
|
Posted: Mon Apr 05, 2010 3:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I played three moves. The XYZ, an XY-Wing (891) and take your choice, an M-Wing (49) or XY-Wing (491). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
daj95376
Joined: 23 Aug 2008 Posts: 3854
|
Posted: Mon Apr 05, 2010 5:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
peterj wrote: | Neat!
Is it vald to think of this as pincer transport? The xyz-wing (149) vertex at r2c9 with pincers at r3c8 and r8c9 would normally just take out the 1 in r1c9. But the strong link r9c8(1)=r3c8(1) extends r8c9 back into the house taking out all the other 1s?? |
Not quite. Your approach is similar to Ted's, but you didn't account for r2c9=4 producing the eliminations in <1> as well. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tlanglet
Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Posts: 2468 Location: Northern California Foothills
|
Posted: Tue Apr 06, 2010 12:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
peterj wrote: | Neat!
Is it vald to think of this as pincer transport? The xyz-wing (149) vertex at r2c9 with pincers at r3c8 and r8c9 would normally just take out the 1 in r1c9. But the strong link r9c8(1)=r3c8(1) extends r8c9 back into the house taking out all the other 1s?? |
I have recently been looking at the similarities between a xyz-wing and a finned xy-wing and posted a new thread here to provide an example. In fact, I found the step for this puzzle while looking for a finned xy-wing condition.
As a finned xy-wing with vertex 49 in r2c9, the only deletion provided by the xy-wing is the 1 on r1c9; the fin 1 in r2c9 will also make that same deletion.
However, when viewed as an xy-wing I believe that the transport of the 1 in r8c9 to r3c8 is valid, resulting in a 1 in either r2c9 or r3c8 thereby deleting the all of the other 1s in box3.
In my original post I presented the step like a xyz-wing simply because I thought it would be less confusing,
Ted |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marty R.
Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
|
Posted: Tue Apr 06, 2010 1:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | As a finned xy-wing with vertex 49 in r2c9, the only deletion provided by the xy-wing is the 1 on r1c9; |
Why not r9c8 as well? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
peterj
Joined: 26 Mar 2010 Posts: 974 Location: London, UK
|
Posted: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
daj95376 wrote: | peterj wrote: | Neat!
Is it vald to think of this as pincer transport? The xyz-wing (149) vertex at r2c9 with pincers at r3c8 and r8c9 would normally just take out the 1 in r1c9. But the strong link r9c8(1)=r3c8(1) extends r8c9 back into the house taking out all the other 1s?? |
Not quite. Your approach is similar to Ted's, but you didn't account for r2c9=4 producing the eliminations in <1> as well. |
The case r2c9=4 potentially eliminating all 1s in block 3 is surely part of the standard xyz-wing i.e. the pincer in the same block as the vertex? The added eliminations come from the logic around the pincer outside the house forcing r3c8 to also be 1. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tlanglet
Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Posts: 2468 Location: Northern California Foothills
|
Posted: Tue Apr 06, 2010 11:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
Marty R. wrote: | Quote: | As a finned xy-wing with vertex 49 in r2c9, the only deletion provided by the xy-wing is the 1 on r1c9; |
Why not r9c8 as well? |
Marty,
The xy-wing would delete 1 from r9c8, but if the fin is true, r2c9=1, then it does not directly "see" r9c8, and if the fin is transported, (1)r2c9 - r3c8 = r9c8, so that it can not be deleted.
Ted |
|
Back to top |
|
|
daj95376
Joined: 23 Aug 2008 Posts: 3854
|
Posted: Tue Apr 06, 2010 4:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
peterj wrote: | The case r2c9=4 potentially eliminating all 1s in block 3 is surely part of the standard xyz-wing i.e. the pincer in the same block as the vertex? The added eliminations come from the logic around the pincer outside the house forcing r3c8 to also be 1. |
Yes, I must have been very tired to have not realized it. Sorry! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|