View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
daj95376
Joined: 23 Aug 2008 Posts: 3854
|
Posted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 6:24 am Post subject: Puzzle 10/04/22 (B) |
|
|
Code: | +-----------------------+
| . 9 4 | 3 . 7 | 2 . 8 |
| 5 2 . | . 9 . | . . . |
| 7 . 3 | . . . | 4 . . |
|-------+-------+-------|
| 9 . . | 5 . . | . . . |
| . 4 . | . 3 . | 1 . . |
| 2 . . | . . . | . . 9 |
|-------+-------+-------|
| 4 . 9 | . 2 . | 7 . 6 |
| . . . | . . . | . 4 . |
| 3 . . | . . 1 | 5 . . |
+-----------------------+
|
Play this puzzle online at the Daily Sudoku site |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mogulmeister
Joined: 03 May 2007 Posts: 1151
|
Posted: Fri Apr 23, 2010 9:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Since nobody fancied this one I will have a pop.
This position arrives after a colouring/xy chain on 1 removes the 1 from r1c7.
Well here we are again: another fine example of "almost XY wing" which is also an ALS elimination and thanks to all who have been chipping in on this - I was very interested in your last comment Luke.
So we have an almost xy wing (in green) there is a fin at r3c2, a 1 which can be disposed of in 4 ways (that I can see):
1. If the fin is true then a contradiction is set up:
(68=1)r3c2-(1=5)r3c9-(5=6)r1c7-(6=1)r1c1 Can't have two 1s in block 1 so r3c2<>1
OR (if you prefer)
2. A nice ALS elimination
Set A is r1c17 = {1,5,6} Set B is r3c9 {1,5}
restricted common is 5 and common candidate 1 in r3c2 is toast.
OR
3/4. Of course there is an xy-wing or xy-chain (you choose) <156>
All different ways of looking at the same thing - whatever, xy-wing <168> is true and puzzle is solved.
Last edited by Mogulmeister on Fri Apr 23, 2010 9:40 am; edited 4 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
peterj
Joined: 26 Mar 2010 Posts: 974 Location: London, UK
|
Posted: Fri Apr 23, 2010 9:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
Mogulmeister,
On the ALS-XZ part, I presume you mean Set B is r3c9 (not 7)...?
But anyway, this is just a another simple xy-wing with vertex 56 at r1c8 and pincers at r1c1, r3c9?!
It is an ALS-XZ also of course - I think all xy-wings are.
[Edit] Sorry your post does say there is an xy-wing, didn't notice it, perhaps you edited it.. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mogulmeister
Joined: 03 May 2007 Posts: 1151
|
Posted: Fri Apr 23, 2010 9:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Absolutely Peter ! Thanks. Will correct it.
[Edit]Yes it occurred to me just as I had posted so I added it for completeness! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mogulmeister
Joined: 03 May 2007 Posts: 1151
|
Posted: Fri Apr 23, 2010 9:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
peterj wrote: | Mogulmeister,
I think all xy-wings are.
|
Yes and presumably 2 hop xy chains as well ? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
peterj
Joined: 26 Mar 2010 Posts: 974 Location: London, UK
|
Posted: Fri Apr 23, 2010 9:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, I think the whole class of techniques from xy-wing, xyz-wing, wxyz-wing, extended xyz-wing are also just special cases of ALS-XZ. Some people think of these techniques as 'bent triples' or 'bent quads' which reflects the ALS structure. Of course ALS-XZ is more powerful - I think the example in the 'fiery' puzzle is not solved by a standard "wing" technique
And of course when the second set is not just a pair then you are in a whole world of complexity...! Beyond me! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mogulmeister
Joined: 03 May 2007 Posts: 1151
|
Posted: Fri Apr 23, 2010 9:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
Wondering into the world of Myth Jellies et al....... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marty R.
Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
|
Posted: Fri Apr 23, 2010 3:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Kite (1) and two XY-Wings (561, 168). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|