View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
daj95376
Joined: 23 Aug 2008 Posts: 3854
|
Posted: Wed Jun 02, 2010 4:33 pm Post subject: Puzzle 10/06/02: (C) BBDB |
|
|
Code: | +-----------------------+
| 7 . . | . . 1 | . . 9 |
| . 9 . | . . . | 8 . . |
| . . . | 5 . . | . . 1 |
|-------+-------+-------|
| . . 9 | 6 . 7 | . . 5 |
| . . . | . . 2 | . . . |
| 5 . . | 9 4 8 | 1 . . |
|-------+-------+-------|
| . 3 . | . . 9 | 6 . 2 |
| . . . | . . . | . . 7 |
| 8 . 7 | 1 . . | 5 9 3 |
+-----------------------+
|
Play this puzzle online at the Daily Sudoku site |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tlanglet
Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Posts: 2468 Location: Northern California Foothills
|
Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 1:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Taking them more or less as I spotted them.................
xy-wing 2-78with vertex 28r8c4; r2c5,r7c4<>7
Flightless xy-wing 2-46 with vertex 26 in r2c5 pseudocell 46 in r9c25 plus transport: (4)r1c4 - r1c3 = r5c3; r5c2<>4
Sashimi s-wing 2 in r29c25; r3c2<>2
Finned x-wing 2 r34c18; r6c8<>2
Finned x-wing 3r16c38; r3c8<>3
xy-wing 1-34 with vertex 14 in r5c3; r23c1, r6c3<>3
Ted |
|
Back to top |
|
|
peterj
Joined: 26 Mar 2010 Posts: 974 Location: London, UK
|
Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 7:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quite a slog... in a nice way
xy-wing(7-28 ) r8c4; r2c5<>7, r7c4<>7
kite(3); r1c3<>3
grouped skyscraper(2); r3c2<>2
kite(2); r4c1<>2
xy-wing(3-14) r5c3; r23c1<>3, r6c3<>3
Basically the same as ted - only favouring turbot over sashimi.. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mogulmeister
Joined: 03 May 2007 Posts: 1151
|
Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 9:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I certainly can't do it in less steps but I'll see if I can produce a different solve path. I had a quick look and was wondering if I can bring my favourite double candidate eliminating (Major-General??) Remote Pair to play.......I'll have a go tomorrow. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
daj95376
Joined: 23 Aug 2008 Posts: 3854
|
Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 9:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If you found a Major-General Remote Pair, then I'd like to see it. My solver doesn't find them other than as two, separate chains that I have to recognize and join manually. So I seldom encounter them. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mogulmeister
Joined: 03 May 2007 Posts: 1151
|
Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 9:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I only had a quick and cursory look at it Danny and I am doing it manually - I should know more tomorrow, could be I have only seen one half of a toggle. Your solver is indicating I probably won't find it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
daj95376
Joined: 23 Aug 2008 Posts: 3854
|
Posted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 10:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mogulmeister wrote: | Your solver is indicating I probably won't find it. |
No, I'm saying that I didn't use my solver to check for chains on this puzzle -- and that's the only way I would encounter it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mogulmeister
Joined: 03 May 2007 Posts: 1151
|
Posted: Fri Jun 04, 2010 11:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
Understood Danny.
In a rush today so only the first two moves:
First Two Moves
1.(4)r4c8=(4-7)r5c8c=(7-1)r5c2c=r8c2c-(1=4)r7c1-r4c1=(4)r4c8; r4c8=4
2.Major-General Remote Pairs <23> at r1c7, r4c7, r6c8, r6c3; r1c3 <>23
(I don't think this carries any great weight in solve path terms but it was fun)
Dashing out – will follow up later |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ronk
Joined: 07 May 2006 Posts: 398
|
Posted: Fri Jun 04, 2010 12:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mogulmeister wrote: | Major-General Remote Pairs <23> at r1c7, r4c7, r6c8, r6c3; r1c3 <>23 |
It seems you are easily entertained. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mogulmeister
Joined: 03 May 2007 Posts: 1151
|
Posted: Fri Jun 04, 2010 1:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Gilbert & Sullivan.
3. Colouring on 4s; r3c1, r5c2 <>4
4. XYZ Wing <246> vertex at r1c3; r3c1<>6
5 Major-General again but this time with 2 extra <23>s making 6 in all.
The 23s stationed at r1c7 and r3c1 mean that r3c8<>2
6 XYZ Wing <478> vertex at r7c4 means r8c4<>8
Curtain. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
daj95376
Joined: 23 Aug 2008 Posts: 3854
|
Posted: Fri Jun 04, 2010 2:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I misunderstood. I thought your Major-General Remote Pair was the same as Keith's general Remote Pair. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mogulmeister
Joined: 03 May 2007 Posts: 1151
|
Posted: Fri Jun 04, 2010 4:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
No I don't even know if there even is a Major-General Remote Pair - hence the G&S references - I should have had him in quotes.. I was following on from ronk's previous remark about brigadier-generals etc.
What can be said about this one is that it toggles so that both 2 and 3 are eliminated in step 2.
I will leave precise nomenclature to those that do that. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
keith
Joined: 19 Sep 2005 Posts: 3355 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
|
Posted: Fri Jun 04, 2010 8:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Mogulmeister wrote: | Understood Danny.
In a rush today so only the first two moves:
First Two Moves
1.(4)r4c8=(4-7)r5c8c=(7-1)r5c2c=r8c2c-(1=4)r7c1-r4c1=(4)r4c8; r4c8=4
2.Major-General Remote Pairs <23> at r1c7, r4c7, r6c8, r6c3; r1c3 <>23
(I don't think this carries any great weight in solve path terms but it was fun)
Dashing out – will follow up later |
Step 2 is a classic remote pair.
Code: | +----------------+----------------+----------------+
| 7 5 2346 | 248 268 1 | 23 236 9 |
| 1236 9 1236 | 27 267 36 | 8 5 4 |
| 2346 246 8 | 5 9 346 | 7 236 1 |
+----------------+----------------+----------------+
| 23 8 9 | 6 1 7 | 23 4 5 |
| 146 146 146 | 3 5 2 | 9 7 8 |
| 5 7 23 | 9 4 8 | 1 23 6 |
+----------------+----------------+----------------+
| 14 3 5 | 478 78 9 | 6 18 2 |
| 9 126 126 | 28 3 5 | 4 18 7 |
| 8 24 7 | 1 26 46 | 5 9 3 |
+----------------+----------------+----------------+ |
Keith |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mogulmeister
Joined: 03 May 2007 Posts: 1151
|
Posted: Sat Jun 05, 2010 9:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
The defining feature being that each of the pairs is only 23 - later on this solve path r1c3 also becomes 23 so that there are 6 of these 23s. I can't imagine this is hugely common. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|