View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
keith
Joined: 19 Sep 2005 Posts: 3355 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
|
Posted: Sat Mar 11, 2006 9:15 am Post subject: DB Saturday puzzle (March 11) |
|
|
Here is today's David Bodycombe puzzle. I had fun with it.
Keith
Code: |
Puzzle: DB031106 ******
+-------+-------+-------+
| . 7 . | . . . | 1 . 3 |
| . . . | 8 1 . | . 5 . |
| 9 1 . | 5 . . | 6 . . |
+-------+-------+-------+
| . . . | . 5 . | . . 4 |
| . 4 5 | . . . | 8 9 . |
| 6 . . | . 2 . | . . . |
+-------+-------+-------+
| . . 2 | . . 1 | . 3 5 |
| . 5 . | . 6 9 | . . . |
| 8 . 9 | . . . | . 1 . |
+-------+-------+-------+
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Steve R
Joined: 24 Oct 2005 Posts: 289 Location: Birmingham, England
|
Posted: Sat Mar 11, 2006 5:36 pm Post subject: Very hard becomes a nightmare |
|
|
Thanks for DB’s latest, Keith. Like you I enjoyed it considerably, though it was tough going by my standards.
In fact it was the second hard slog of the week, the first being samgj’s very hard of 9 March. You might like to try it after moving the 7 in row 1 one cell to the left. This is the result:
Code: | -------------------------
| . . 6 | 9 7 . | . . 4 |
| . . . | . . . | 6 7 . |
| 7 . . | . . . | 1 . 5 |
-------------------------
| . . . | . 5 9 | . . 1 |
| 3 5 . | . . . | . 2 6 |
| 8 . . | 6 4 . | . . . |
-------------------------
| 9 . 4 | . . . | . . 8 |
| . 8 5 | . . . | . . . |
| 6 . . | 8 . 5 | 9 . . |
-------------------------
|
DB would be horrified at the asymmetry but not, I think, too ashamed of the challenge which resulted.
Steve |
|
Back to top |
|
|
David Bryant
Joined: 29 Jul 2005 Posts: 559 Location: Denver, Colorado
|
Posted: Sat Mar 11, 2006 6:28 pm Post subject: It's a good puzzle |
|
|
I liked the Bodycombe puzzle too -- coloring on the "7"s plus one XY-Wing did the trick for me.
Steve, I'm curious how you found the permutation on samgj's puzzle. Do you often look for slight alterations like that? How often does a valid puzzle result? dcb |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Steve R
Joined: 24 Oct 2005 Posts: 289 Location: Birmingham, England
|
Posted: Sat Mar 11, 2006 9:22 pm Post subject: It's a good puzzle |
|
|
No. I put it in a solver to check that it involved more than singles, made a transcription error and became interested.
I have tinkered with puzzles on only three occasions, using a solver to see if the symmetric original could be reconstructed from partially worked grids found on web sites. I succeeded the first time but on each occasion stumbled through too many multiple solution or invalid grids to recommend the practice.
Steve |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marty R.
Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
|
Posted: Sat Mar 11, 2006 11:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Keith, I also like that you post these DB puzzles. This one I was able to solve with the use of two forcing chains. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
keith
Joined: 19 Sep 2005 Posts: 3355 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
|
Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2006 12:46 am Post subject: Reasons to post puzzles |
|
|
Marty, Steve, David, and all:
I have been posting these puzzles only when they involve something more than "basic" techniques.
I think of basic techniques as forced and pinned values, naked and hidden sets, and row / block / column interactions. I have not yet seen a Daily Sudoku that requires more than these techniques.
The next (intermediate?) level includes X and XY-wings, swordfish, unique rectangles, BUG patterns, simple coloring, and the like. The DB puzzles I have posted involve these.
I think of the various chain techniques as "advanced", possibly because I have such difficulty seeing them.
Anyway, I am not trying to start a debate on classification of solution strategies. This is a long way of explaining why I posted three puzzles two weeks ago, none last week, and only one this week.
Keith
Last edited by keith on Sun Mar 12, 2006 2:49 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
David Bryant
Joined: 29 Jul 2005 Posts: 559 Location: Denver, Colorado
|
Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2006 1:53 am Post subject: The modified 3/09/06 puzzle |
|
|
Steve R wrote: | ... it was the second hard slog of the week, the first being samgj’s very hard of 9 March. You might like to try it after moving the 7 in row 1 one cell to the left. |
Thanks for the "extra" puzzle, Steve.
I used coloring on the "2"s plus a double-implication chain to get through this one. I also noticed that one could get there by finding a swordfish pattern, plus an XY-Wing.
An extremely interesting variation on one of samgj's better puzzles! Thanks again. dcb |
|
Back to top |
|
|
someone_somewhere
Joined: 07 Aug 2005 Posts: 275 Location: Munich
|
Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2006 3:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi,
could not resist to take a look at this one.
I found a nice 5 star in the following places:
r2c6 = 47
r2c7 = 47
r3c5 = 347
r9c5 = 47
r9c7 = 47
Staring with r2c6 as alpha and following only the digit 4 (which means coloring!!!):
r2c6 = 4 r2c7 <> 4 r9c7 = 4
r2c6 = 4 r3c5 <> 4 r9c5 = 4
And this is excluding 4 from r2c6, because of contradiction in row 9.
Nice one, thank you.
see u next week, |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|