View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Ema Nymton
Joined: 17 Apr 2009 Posts: 89
|
Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2010 11:26 am Post subject: And Now For Something Completely Different. |
|
|
.
Code: |
+---------------+----------+----------------+
| 3 2 5 | 6 1 9 | 8 4 7 |
| 19 4 19 | 7 8 3 | 25 6 25 |
| 68 78 678 | 4 5 2 | 19 19 3 |
+---------------+----------+----------------+
| 2 38 368 | 1 4 7 | 36 5 9 |
| 169 379 13679 | 8 29 5 | 12346 127 1246 |
| 4 5 179 | 29 3 6 | 12 127 8 |
+---------------+----------+----------------+
| 7 39 2349 | 239 6 8 | 12459 129 1245 |
| 5 1 239 | 239 7 4 | 269 8 26 |
| 89 6 2489 | 5 29 1 | 7 3 24 |
+---------------+----------+----------------+
|
6 August 2010 Washington Post published a puzzle with the difficulty rating of 5 stars. Assuming no errors, the basic steps gets one at the above point.
Can one get help in solving this puzzle? (Using Draw/Play rates the puzzle too hard.)
Ema Nymton
~@:o?
. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cgordon
Joined: 04 May 2007 Posts: 769 Location: ontario, canada
|
Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2010 2:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
(Shouldn't you be in Other Puzzles?)
I found a skyscraper that got rid of the 9's in R9C13. That finished it off.
Cheers |
|
Back to top |
|
|
yeoks
Joined: 16 May 2010 Posts: 33
|
Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2010 2:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi Ema,
based on what you've given, it needs further cleanup in box 6.
There's a naked triplet (127) in it.
Then, look at column 9. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ema Nymton
Joined: 17 Apr 2009 Posts: 89
|
Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2010 8:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
.
yeoks wrote: | Hi Ema,
based on what you've given, it needs further cleanup in box 6.
There's a naked triplet (127) in it.
Then, look at column 9. |
Thanks.
Sorry about posting in wrong forum.
Ema Nymton
~@:o?
. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|