View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
daj95376
Joined: 23 Aug 2008 Posts: 3854
|
Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 3:24 am Post subject: Puzzle 10/08/23: A |
|
|
Code: | +-----------------------+
| . 1 7 | 9 . . | 4 . . |
| 8 3 . | 5 . . | . 1 9 |
| 5 . 9 | 8 . . | . . 7 |
|-------+-------+-------|
| 7 2 3 | 4 8 . | . . 5 |
| . . . | 1 . . | . . . |
| . . . | . . 5 | . . 4 |
|-------+-------+-------|
| 2 . . | . . . | 9 . . |
| . 7 . | . . . | . . . |
| . 9 5 | 2 . 4 | . . 1 |
+-----------------------+
|
Play this puzzle online at the Daily Sudoku site |
|
Back to top |
|
|
JC Van Hay
Joined: 13 Jun 2010 Posts: 494 Location: Charleroi, Belgium
|
Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 9:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | Swordfish on 6 : (6)R349/c568 : => r5678c58<>6
5-SIS AIC : (96)R4C6 (61)R3C6 1B8 (14)R8C1 (49)R5C1 : (9)r4c6=(9)r5c1 : => r5c5<>9
Type 1 UR(23)R15C56 : => r5c5=7 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
tlanglet
Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Posts: 2468 Location: Northern California Foothills
|
Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 3:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
An ANP() did the deed.........
Quote: | ANP(78=6)r9c78-r4c8=r4c6-(6=1)r3c6-r3c5=r8c5-(1=4)r8c1-(4=236)ls:r7c9|r8c89; r9c8<>6 contradiction
|
Ted |
|
Back to top |
|
|
JC Van Hay
Joined: 13 Jun 2010 Posts: 494 Location: Charleroi, Belgium
|
Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 4:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ted, nice use of the fish ! As with Boolean Variables, one could say "To kill or not to kill the fish, that's the question ... "
JC |
|
Back to top |
|
|
peterj
Joined: 26 Mar 2010 Posts: 974 Location: London, UK
|
Posted: Mon Aug 23, 2010 8:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
An xy chain...
Quote: | xy-chain with pair ; (6=7)r9c5 - (7=36)r7c49 - (6=8)r7c2 - (8=1)r7c6 - (1=6)r3c6 - (6=9)r4c6 - (9=6)r4c8 ; r9c8<>6 |
[Edit. Same elimination as Ted but a different chain I think] |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marty R.
Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
|
Posted: Tue Aug 24, 2010 12:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Potential UR (23) boxes 36; pseudo cell 16789.
XY-Chain, 3-cell; r5c5<>9. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tlanglet
Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Posts: 2468 Location: Northern California Foothills
|
Posted: Tue Aug 24, 2010 2:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
Marty R. wrote: | Potential UR (23) boxes 36; pseudo cell 16789.
XY-Chain, 3-cell; r5c5<>9. |
Marty,
Great find on that type 3 UR 23
Also, I assume when you indicate a 3-cell xy-chain, you mean an xy-wing?????
Ted |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marty R.
Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
|
Posted: Tue Aug 24, 2010 3:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | Also, I assume when you indicate a 3-cell xy-chain, you mean an xy-wing????? |
Well, who knows, I suppose it could be anything at the rate I miss things, but I played it as an XY-Chain. Would a 3-cell XY-Chain, by definition, have to be an XY-Wing? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
daj95376
Joined: 23 Aug 2008 Posts: 3854
|
Posted: Tue Aug 24, 2010 5:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Marty R. wrote: | Quote: | Also, I assume when you indicate a 3-cell xy-chain, you mean an xy-wing????? |
Well, who knows, I suppose it could be anything at the rate I miss things, but I played it as an XY-Chain. Would a 3-cell XY-Chain, by definition, have to be an XY-Wing? |
It's all a matter of perspective ... I learned.
If you start from a bivalue cell and treat it like a Kraken Cell with two supporting bivalue cells, then you have an XY-Wing. If you start from a tri-value cell and similarly treat it like a Kraken Cell, then you have an XYZ-Wing.
If you start from a bivalue cells and go to another bivalue cell and then proceed to a third bivaue cell, then you have a 3-cell XY-Chain.
I stopped commenting awhile back about how many extended XY-Wings could also be see as 4/5-cell XY-Chains. Similarly for some of Ted's ALS examples that used only bivalue cells.
How a person finds the elimination is often just as important as the elimination. Something this ole programmer took awhile to learn!
Last edited by daj95376 on Tue Aug 24, 2010 5:22 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marty R.
Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
|
Posted: Tue Aug 24, 2010 5:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I did it again and it was indeed an XY-Wing. I just saw the chain without seeing the wing. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|