View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
daj95376
Joined: 23 Aug 2008 Posts: 3854
|
Posted: Wed Sep 29, 2010 4:22 pm Post subject: Puzzle 10/09/29: A |
|
|
Code: | +-----------------------+
| . . . | . . 9 | 3 . . |
| . . . | 7 . 3 | . 9 . |
| . . 3 | . 2 4 | . 7 1 |
|-------+-------+-------|
| . 1 . | 3 . . | . . . |
| . . 8 | . 1 2 | . . 9 |
| 2 6 4 | . 8 5 | 1 . 7 |
|-------+-------+-------|
| 1 . . | . . 8 | 7 . . |
| . 8 7 | . . . | . 2 . |
| . . 2 | . 3 7 | . . . |
+-----------------------+
|
Play this puzzle online at the Daily Sudoku site |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marty R.
Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
|
Posted: Thu Sep 30, 2010 4:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | M-Wing (56), flightless with pincer transport |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
daj95376
Joined: 23 Aug 2008 Posts: 3854
|
Posted: Thu Sep 30, 2010 2:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I decided to implement Remote Pair as an XY-Chain for each candidate value. Then manually merge the results. When's the last time you encountered an 8-cell Remote Pair that's a single-stepper?
Code: | after basics
+--------------------------------------------------------------+
| 478 247 *56 | 1 *56 9 | 3 48 248 |
| 48 24 1 | 7 *56 3 | 248 9 *56 |
| 569 59 3 | 8 2 4 | *56 7 1 |
|--------------------+--------------------+--------------------|
| 59 1 59 | 3 7 6 | 248 48 248 |
| 37 37 8 | 4 1 2 | *56 *56 9 |
| 2 6 4 | 9 8 5 | 1 3 7 |
|--------------------+--------------------+--------------------|
| 1 3459 9-56 | 2 49 8 | 7 *56 3456 |
| 356 8 7 | 56 49 1 | 49 2 356 |
| 4569 459 2 | 56 3 7 | 489 1 4568 |
+--------------------------------------------------------------+
# 58 eliminations remain
RP <56>: r1c35 + r2c59 + r35c7 + r57c8 => r7c3<>56
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marty R.
Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
|
Posted: Thu Sep 30, 2010 4:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | When's the last time you encountered an 8-cell Remote Pair that's a single-stepper? |
I don't know if I've ever had one. If my grid was the same, I obviously missed it or maybe just didn't look past the first three 56 cells that I saw. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|