View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
prakash
Joined: 02 Jan 2008 Posts: 67 Location: New Jersey, USA
|
Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2010 2:46 am Post subject: Oct 28 VH |
|
|
For the first time I found a sashimi X wing! This was after clearing up with 2 X wings. Nice! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marty R.
Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
|
Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2010 3:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
There had been a long string of puzzles with XY-Wing solutions, but this one just needed an X-Wing on 2, at least it did on my first pass. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kuskey
Joined: 10 Dec 2008 Posts: 141 Location: Pembroke, NH
|
Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2010 4:50 am Post subject: 28 Oct VH |
|
|
For me this was a nice challenge. I used an x-wing on 2, some meanigful cleanup which revealed a 689 xy-wing on 6 with pivot at r3c3 eliminating 6 at r2c9, solving the puzzle. I also found an x-wing on 3 that didn't contribute to the solution. I tried real hard for a solution after the x-wing on 2 but couldn't get there Marty. I'll give it another shot and also go trolling for some Sashimi x-wing, which will be a first for me. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marty R.
Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
|
Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2010 4:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
Maybe I should give it another shot too. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kuskey
Joined: 10 Dec 2008 Posts: 141 Location: Pembroke, NH
|
Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2010 6:48 am Post subject: 28 Oct VH |
|
|
Prakash, I'm not having any luck locating your sashimi x-wing. Would you give up a hint as to its location? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
prakash
Joined: 02 Jan 2008 Posts: 67 Location: New Jersey, USA
|
Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2010 10:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
After the basics and the X wing on 2 and Xwing on 3, my grid looks like this:
Code: |
.------------------.------------------.------------------.
| 26 4 1 | 69 689 3 | 2689* 5 7 |
| 3 689* 289 | 5 7 4 | 1 289- 269 |
| 7 5 89 | 2 689 1 | 4 3 69 |
:------------------+------------------+------------------:
| 4 7 58 | 1 59 6 | 3 289 29 |
| 9 2 35 | 7 35 8 | 6 1 4 |
| 1 38* 6 | 39 4 2 | 89* 7 5 |
:------------------+------------------+------------------:
| 8 39 4 | 36 26 7 | 5 29 1 |
| 26 69 7 | 8 1 5 | 29 4 3 |
| 5 1 23 | 4 23 9 | 7 6 8 |
'------------------'------------------'------------------'
|
The Sashimi on 8 eliminates the 8 on r2C8 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
George Woods
Joined: 28 Mar 2006 Posts: 304 Location: Dorset UK
|
Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2010 2:32 pm Post subject: question on Sahimi |
|
|
Prakas writes
Quote: | The Sashimi on 8 eliminates the 8 on r2C8 |
What is the difference beteen sashimi and a skyscraper? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marty R.
Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
|
Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2010 3:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I did indeed screw up, as the X-Wing on 2 wasn't enough on my second try. A Finned X-Wing on 8 does it, as does a flightless XY-Wing on 396 with transport, as does an XY-Wing on 896.
Code: | .------------------.------------------.------------------.
| 26 4 1 | 69 689 3 | 2689* 5 7 |
| 3 689* 289 | 5 7 4 | 1 289- 269 |
| 7 5 89 | 2 689 1 | 4 3 69 |
:------------------+------------------+------------------:
| 4 7 58 | 1 59 6 | 3 289 29 |
| 9 2 35 | 7 35 8 | 6 1 4 |
| 1 38* 6 | 39 4 2 | 89* 7 5 |
:------------------+------------------+------------------:
| 8 39 4 | 36 26 7 | 5 29 1 |
| 26 69 7 | 8 1 5 | 29 4 3 |
| 5 1 23 | 4 23 9 | 7 6 8 |
'------------------'------------------'------------------' |
Prakash's grid above has an excess 9 in r2c2 because of the locked 9s in box7. Deleting the 9 exposes the 896 XY-Wing. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cgordon
Joined: 04 May 2007 Posts: 769 Location: ontario, canada
|
Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2010 4:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
After the x wing on <2>, I used a skyscraper on <2> in C28 to knock off the 2 in R6C7. Or was that a Sashimi? Wasn't that the little guy in Austin Powers? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tlanglet
Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Posts: 2468 Location: Northern California Foothills
|
Posted: Thu Oct 28, 2010 6:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If the sashimi pattern contains a single fin, then the pattern is identical to a skyscraper. Both patterns will make the same deletion in the box containing the sashimi fin. However the skyscraper may also make a deletion in the box containing the top of the other skyscraper. Also note that the sashimi pattern with a single fin can be viewed in a mirror fashion that would then make the same deletion as the skyscraper.
If the sashimi pattern contains two fins, the pattern is not a skyscraper but the sashimi will still make the normal deletion in the box containing both fins.
For this puzzle, the sashimi pattern contains a single fin in r1c7 so it is the same as a skyscraper. If cell r3c7 also contained a 8, then the pattern would have two fins the pattern would not be a skyscraper but the sashimi pattern would still provide the deletion r2c8<>8.
Also the original sashimi pattern was (8)r26c27 which resulted in r2c8<>8. This pattern could also be viewed as a sashimi x-wing (8)r16c27 which would result in r1c13<>8.
Ted |
|
Back to top |
|
|
George Woods
Joined: 28 Mar 2006 Posts: 304 Location: Dorset UK
|
Posted: Fri Oct 29, 2010 1:41 pm Post subject: a rose by any other name |
|
|
The same set of 8s for a skyscraper or sashimi could also be termed an ER.
The stronly linked 8's in col2 deny an 8 at r6c7 since an 8 here would deny any position for an 8 in Box3 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|