View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
peterj
Joined: 26 Mar 2010 Posts: 974 Location: London, UK
|
Posted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 6:07 pm Post subject: Krampus Edition - "Nice" #1 |
|
|
Code: | *-----------*
|...|2..|..7|
|.2.|.15|..4|
|..9|.84|...|
|---+---+---|
|34.|...|1..|
|.6.|8.1|.4.|
|..2|...|.36|
|---+---+---|
|...|59.|6..|
|7..|12.|.9.|
|2..|..6|...|
*-----------* |
Code: | 000200007020015004009084000340000100060801040002000036000590600700120090200006000 |
(c) Helmut Saueregger |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marty R.
Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
|
Posted: Wed Dec 08, 2010 11:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Code: |
+-------+-------+-------+
| . . . | 2 . . | . . 7 |
| . 2 . | . 1 5 | . . 4 |
| . . 9 | . 8 4 | . . . |
+-------+-------+-------+
| 3 4 . | . . . | 1 . . |
| . 6 . | 8 . 1 | . 4 . |
| . . 2 | . . . | . 3 6 |
+-------+-------+-------+
| . . . | 5 9 . | 6 . . |
| 7 . . | 1 2 . | . 9 . |
| 2 . . | . . 6 | . . . |
+-------+-------+-------+
|
Play this puzzle online at the Daily Sudoku site
M-Wing (79), flightless, with transport; r6c457<>7
ERs (8,8,7); the 7 was the key, r4c8<>7 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tlanglet
Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Posts: 2468 Location: Northern California Foothills
|
Posted: Thu Dec 09, 2010 3:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Flightless xy-wing 3-79 with both pincers transported on 7: (7)r6c2=(7)r3c2-(7=3)r3c4-(3=9)r1c6-(9=7)r6c6*-r7c6=r7c8-r4c8=(7)r5c7; r6c57, r5c3<>7
Ted |
|
Back to top |
|
|
daj95376
Joined: 23 Aug 2008 Posts: 3854
|
Posted: Thu Dec 09, 2010 7:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ted, an impressive network. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marty R.
Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
|
Posted: Fri Dec 10, 2010 1:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
daj95376 wrote: | Ted, an impressive network. |
Danny, how would you define "network"? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
daj95376
Joined: 23 Aug 2008 Posts: 3854
|
Posted: Fri Dec 10, 2010 1:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
Marty R. wrote: | daj95376 wrote: | Ted, an impressive network. |
Danny, how would you define "network"? |
Code: | (7)r6c2=(7)r3c2-(7=3)r3c4-(3=9)r1c6-(9=7)r6c6*-r7c6=r7c8-r4c8=(7)r5c7; r6c57, r5c3<>7
_____________________________________________________________________________________
|
When Ted gets to this part of his chain:
(7)r6c2=...-(9=7)r6c6*...
he's able to deduce r6c57<>7.
Without remembering the elimination r6c7<>7, this part of his chain:
r4c8=(7)r5c7
fails to materialize and produce the critical elimination r5c3<>7.
Network: When elimination(s) created earlier in the chain must be remembered to allow a step later in the chain.
Code: | +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| 1458 1358 13458 | 2 6 39 | 3589 158 7 |
| 68 2 37 | 379 1 5 | 39 68 4 |
| 156 1357 9 | 37 8 4 | 235 1256 1235 |
|-----------------------+-----------------------+-----------------------|
| 3 4 578 | 6 57 2 | 1 578 9 |
| 9 6 57 | 8 3 1 | 257 4 25 |
| 158 1578 2 | 49 457 79 | 578 3 6 |
|-----------------------+-----------------------+-----------------------|
| 148 138 1348 | 5 9 378 | 6 127 1238 |
| 7 358 6 | 1 2 38 | 4 9 358 |
| 2 9 1358 | 34 47 6 | 357 157 1358 |
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------+
# 87 eliminations remain
|
Two step alternative:
Code: | (7)r6c2=(7)r3c2-(7=3)r3c4-(3=9)r1c6-(9=7)r6c6 => r6c57<>7
turbot fish: (7)r4c5 = r6c6 - r7c6 = (7)r7c8 => r4c8<>7
|
Peter: I deliberately skipped making the first step into a loop.
Last edited by daj95376 on Fri Dec 10, 2010 2:33 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tlanglet
Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Posts: 2468 Location: Northern California Foothills
|
Posted: Fri Dec 10, 2010 2:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
daj95376 wrote: | Ted, an impressive network. |
Danny,
Thanks very much foryour comment. I have been greatly distracted recently by supporting a yearly volunteer activity and have not had the time/opportunity to play sudoku regularly, so it was nice to readily find this chain. It actually started as a flightless xy-wing 3-79 with vertex in r1c6 and just grew by extending both pincers.
I have recently gotten into the habit of trying to extend all pincers associated with any pattern. As with any other move, transporting pincers sometimes is useless but sometimes they pay of handsomely as in this case. In general I believe that the small additional effort is worth the results.
Ted |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|