View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
daj95376
Joined: 23 Aug 2008 Posts: 3854
|
Posted: Fri Feb 11, 2011 5:07 pm Post subject: Puzzle 11/02/11 |
|
|
Code: | +-----------------------+
| 9 . . | . . . | 1 6 . |
| . 6 . | . 9 1 | 3 8 . |
| . . 1 | . 6 . | . . . |
|-------+-------+-------|
| . . . | . 3 8 | . 2 . |
| . 2 8 | 9 5 . | 4 7 3 |
| . 3 . | 1 . . | . . 5 |
|-------+-------+-------|
| 2 1 . | . 8 . | 9 . . |
| 4 9 . | 6 2 . | . 1 . |
| . . . | . 1 9 | . . 2 |
+-----------------------+
|
Play this puzzle online at the Daily Sudoku site |
|
Back to top |
|
|
peterj
Joined: 26 Mar 2010 Posts: 974 Location: London, UK
|
Posted: Fri Feb 11, 2011 5:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Valid MUG?
Code: | *-----------------------------------------------------------*
| 9 58 25-3 | 2358 47 35 | 1 6 47 |
| 57 6 2457 | 2457 9 1 | 3 8 47 |
| 38 478 1 | 3478 6 347 | 2 5 9 |
|-------------------+-------------------+-------------------|
| 57 457 9 | 47 3 8 | 6 2 1 |
| 1 2 8 | 9 5 6 | 4 7 3 |
| 6 3 47 | 1 47 2 | 8 9 5 |
|-------------------+-------------------+-------------------|
| 2 1 *57+3 |*3457 8 3457 | 9 *34 6 |
| 4 9 *57+3 | 6 2 357 |*57 1 8 |
| 8-3 578 6 |*3457 1 9 |*57 *34 2 |
*-----------------------------------------------------------*
A UR(34)r79c48 overlapping a 6-cell ADP(57)r7c34|r8c37|r9c47 to make a MUG(3457). |
So two steps...
Code: | Type-2 MUG(3457) ; r9c1<>3, r1c3<>3
w-wing(57) r2c1, r9c2, (5)r4c1=r4c2 ; r3c2<>7 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marty R.
Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
|
Posted: Sat Feb 12, 2011 5:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
I used Multi-Coloring on 7 and two XY-Wings, 583 and 358 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
daj95376
Joined: 23 Aug 2008 Posts: 3854
|
Posted: Sat Feb 12, 2011 12:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
peterj wrote: | Valid MUG?
Code: | *-----------------------------------------------------------*
| 9 58 25-3 | 2358 47 35 | 1 6 47 |
| 57 6 2457 | 2457 9 1 | 3 8 47 |
| 38 478 1 | 3478 6 347 | 2 5 9 |
|-------------------+-------------------+-------------------|
| 57 457 9 | 47 3 8 | 6 2 1 |
| 1 2 8 | 9 5 6 | 4 7 3 |
| 6 3 47 | 1 47 2 | 8 9 5 |
|-------------------+-------------------+-------------------|
| 2 1 *57+3 |*3457 8 3457 | 9 *34 6 |
| 4 9 *57+3 | 6 2 357 |*57 1 8 |
| 8-3 578 6 |*3457 1 9 |*57 *34 2 |
*-----------------------------------------------------------*
A UR(34)r79c48 overlapping a 6-cell ADP(57)r7c34|r8c37|r9c47 to make a MUG(3457). |
|
Peter: I'm not comfortable with the fact that r78c3<>3 results in r8c37=57 forcing r8c6=3 ... and destroying the <34> UR.
However, here's a 10-cell <47> DP for you to play with! (darn dangling participle!!!) _
Code: | +--------------------------------------------------------------+
| 9 58 235 | 2358 *47 35 | 1 6 *47 |
| 57 6 *47+25 | 2457 9 1 | 3 8 *47 |
| 38 *47+8 1 | *47+38 6 347 | 2 5 9 |
|--------------------+--------------------+--------------------|
| 57 *45+7 9 | *47 3 8 | 6 2 1 |
| 1 2 8 | 9 5 6 | 4 7 3 |
| 6 3 *47 | 1 *47 2 | 8 9 5 |
|--------------------+--------------------+--------------------|
| 2 1 357 | 3457 8 3457 | 9 34 6 |
| 4 9 357 | 6 2 357 | 57 1 8 |
| 38 578 6 | 3457 1 9 | 57 34 2 |
+--------------------------------------------------------------+
# 53 eliminations remain
|
Regards, Danny
Last edited by daj95376 on Sat Feb 12, 2011 1:01 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
peterj
Joined: 26 Mar 2010 Posts: 974 Location: London, UK
|
Posted: Sat Feb 12, 2011 1:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
daj95376 wrote: | Peter: I'm not comfortable with the fact that r78c3<>3 results in r8c37=57 forcing r8c6=3 ... and destroying the <34> UR. |
Yes it destroys the UR(34) ... but doesn't it also force the DP(57)?
r78c3<>3 creates two NP(57) r8c37 and r78c3...
(57)r8c37 forces 3 in r8c6 hence r79c4<>3...
(57)r78c3 forces 4 in r6c3 and so 4 in r4c4 hence r79c4<>4
We now have the DP(57)!
I find these MUGs endlessley confusing and the recent thread on the sudoku.org.uk board didn't help. I was hoping that "overlapping UR" was a good starting point. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
daj95376
Joined: 23 Aug 2008 Posts: 3854
|
Posted: Sat Feb 12, 2011 1:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If I start the <34> UR with r7c8=3 and the <57> DP with r8c7=5, then I can't complete cells r7c46 in [band 3] of your MUG.
Code: | *-----------------------------------------------------------*
| 9 5 23 | 238 47 5 | 1 6 47 |
| 57 6 24 | 247 9 1 | 3 8 47 |
| 8 47 1 | 3478 6 47 | 2 5 9 |
|-------------------+-------------------+-------------------|
| 57 457 9 | 47 3 8 | 6 2 1 |
| 1 2 8 | 9 5 6 | 4 7 3 |
| 6 3 4 | 1 47 2 | 8 9 5 |
|-------------------+-------------------+-------------------|
| 2 1 5 | 47 8 47 | 9 3 6 |
| 4 9 7 | 6 2 3 | 5 1 8 |
| 3 8 6 | 5 1 9 | 7 4 2 |
*-----------------------------------------------------------*
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
ronk
Joined: 07 May 2006 Posts: 398
|
Posted: Sat Feb 12, 2011 2:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I suspect any 2-cell overlap of two BUG-Lites** will not result in a MUG. In this case, the pattern ...
Code: | . . . | . . . | . . .
-------------+--------------+--------------
. . 57 | 3457 . . | . 34 .
. . 57 | . . . | 57 . .
. . . | 3457 . . | 57 34 . |
... has ...
Code: | . . . | . . . | . . .
-------------+--------------+--------------
. . 7 | 3 . . | . 4 .
. . 5 | . . . | 7 . .
. . . | 7 . . | 5 3 . |
... as a possible outcome. No deadly pattern there.
** A UR is the smallest possible BUG-Lite+0. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
peterj
Joined: 26 Mar 2010 Posts: 974 Location: London, UK
|
Posted: Sat Feb 12, 2011 2:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ronk wrote: | I suspect any 2-cell overlap of two BUG-Lites** will not result in a MUG.. |
Do you think the converse is true i.e any 1-cell overlap of two BUG-lites/UR is a MUG is true? At least I can come out of this with some sort of 'rule' to work from in the future! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ronk
Joined: 07 May 2006 Posts: 398
|
Posted: Sat Feb 12, 2011 6:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
peterj wrote: | ronk wrote: | I suspect any 2-cell overlap of two BUG-Lites** will not result in a MUG.. |
Do you think the converse is true i.e any 1-cell overlap of two BUG-lites/UR is a MUG is true? |
Yes. Consider the outcome for each possible placement in the overlap-cell ... in the absence of an "extra" candidate anywhere in the combined pattern, of course. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|