View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
daj95376
Joined: 23 Aug 2008 Posts: 3854
|
Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2011 12:14 am Post subject: Puzzle 11/04/29: ~ Difficult+ |
|
|
Code: | +-----------------------+
| 3 . . | 6 . . | . . . |
| . 6 . | . . . | . 7 3 |
| . . 8 | . . . | 4 . . |
|-------+-------+-------|
| 5 . . | 8 3 . | 6 1 . |
| . . . | 2 6 . | . 5 . |
| . . . | . . 7 | . 4 8 |
|-------+-------+-------|
| . . 5 | 7 . . | . 3 . |
| . 3 . | 4 8 6 | 7 9 5 |
| . 4 . | . . 3 | . 6 . |
+-----------------------+
|
Play this puzzle online at the Daily Sudoku site |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tlanglet
Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Posts: 2468 Location: Northern California Foothills
|
Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2011 1:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I still enjoy an AUR...............
Quote: | AUR (59)r69c45 external sis: r4c6=9,r7c56=9; r6c12<>1
(9)r4c6-(4)r4c6=(4)r5c6-als(4=18)r5c12;
||
(9)r7c56-(9=8)r7c2-(8=1)r5c2;
|
Ted |
|
Back to top |
|
|
peterj
Joined: 26 Mar 2010 Posts: 974 Location: London, UK
|
Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2011 5:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ted, nice move - perhaps slightly easier to see if you use the internal sis (1)r6c45?
Having spent 20 mins looking for a one-stepper, failing and then seeing your move, it sent me back to look for a non-UR version... completely OTT but I had some fun
Code: | Consider these two almost-patterns:
xy-wing(89-1) (1=8)r5c2-(8=9)r7c2-(9=1)r7c6, fin (2)r7c6
w-wing(79) (9=7)r4c2-r1c2=r1c3-(7=9)r9c3, fin (7)r1c5
xy-wing(89-1)=(2)r7c6 - (2=5)r1c6 - als(1579)[(5)r3c6=(7)r3c5] - (7)r1c5=w-wing(79) - (9=8)r7c2 - (8=1)r5c2 ; r5c6<>1 |
[Edit] I now see it could be much simpler!
Code: | xy-wing(89-1)=(2)r7c6 - (2=5)r1c6 - als(1579)[(5)r3c6=(7)r3c5] - (7)r3c1=(7-8)r9c1=r7c2 - (8=1)r5c2 ; r5c6<>1 |
As we say in the Uk after you have made a bit of a tit of yourself, "I'll get my coat..."
Last edited by peterj on Sat Apr 30, 2011 6:14 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tlanglet
Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Posts: 2468 Location: Northern California Foothills
|
Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2011 6:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
peterj wrote: | Ted, nice move - perhaps slightly easier to see if you use the internal sis (1)r6c45? |
Peter,
My code after basics has (2) in r9c5 as an additional internal inference. I saw both but posted the external since I found it first. For the internal set, the additional digit (2)r9c5-als(2=19)r7c56-(9=8)r7c2-(8=1)r5c2 to make the identical deletion as the external sis.
I guess a mixed internal/external sis may be the simplest.
Ted |
|
Back to top |
|
|
peterj
Joined: 26 Mar 2010 Posts: 974 Location: London, UK
|
Posted: Sat Apr 30, 2011 6:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tlanglet wrote: | I guess a mixed internal/external sis may be the simplest |
Sorry not to be clear, that was exactly what I meant the internal sis (1)r6c23 and external sis (9)r9c13
Code: | ur(59)[(1)r6c23=(9)r9c13] - (9=8)r7c2 - (8=1)r5c2 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
tlanglet
Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Posts: 2468 Location: Northern California Foothills
|
Posted: Sun May 01, 2011 2:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
peterj wrote: | Ted, nice move - perhaps slightly easier to see if you use the internal sis (1)r6c45?
Having spent 20 mins looking for a one-stepper, failing and then seeing your move, it sent me back to look for a non-UR version... completely OTT but I had some fun
Code: | Consider these two almost-patterns:
xy-wing(89-1) (1=8)r5c2-(8=9)r7c2-(9=1)r7c6, fin (2)r7c6
w-wing(79) (9=7)r4c2-r1c2=r1c3-(7=9)r9c3, fin (7)r1c5
xy-wing(89-1)=(2)r7c6 - (2=5)r1c6 - als(1579)[(5)r3c6=(7)r3c5] - (7)r1c5=w-wing(79) - (9=8)r7c2 - (8=1)r5c2 ; r5c6<>1 |
[Edit] I now see it could be much simpler!
Code: | xy-wing(89-1)=(2)r7c6 - (2=5)r1c6 - als(1579)[(5)r3c6=(7)r3c5] - (7)r3c1=(7-8)r9c1=r7c2 - (8=1)r5c2 ; r5c6<>1 |
As we say in the Uk after you have made a bit of a tit of yourself, "I'll get my coat..." |
Peter, Congratulations, I think you reached a hew height with your original solution, but I do not believe it is possible to go completely "OTT"
I enjoyed just following your logic; it was great.
Ted |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marty R.
Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
|
Posted: Sun May 01, 2011 10:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I also used the 59 UR. Internal analysis yielded numerous common outcomes. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|