View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
keith
Joined: 19 Sep 2005 Posts: 3355 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
|
Posted: Sun Oct 09, 2011 2:55 pm Post subject: Free Press Oct 7, 2011 |
|
|
On the easy side ...
Code: | Puzzle: FP100711
+-------+-------+-------+
| . . . | . . . | . . . |
| . . 4 | 8 . . | 1 . 3 |
| 8 . . | 7 1 5 | . . . |
+-------+-------+-------+
| . . . | 1 4 2 | . 7 . |
| . 9 6 | . . . | 2 1 . |
| . 4 . | 6 9 7 | . . . |
+-------+-------+-------+
| . . . | 4 5 8 | . . 7 |
| 4 . 9 | . . 6 | 3 . . |
| . . . | . . . | . . . |
+-------+-------+-------+
|
Play this puzzle online at the Daily Sudoku site
Keith |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marty R.
Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
|
Posted: Sun Oct 09, 2011 4:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I noted two moves, then stopped looking.
Eight-cell Remote Pairs; r3c9, r7c8<>26
-or-
Kite with one transport; r9c1<>2 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
keith
Joined: 19 Sep 2005 Posts: 3355 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
|
Posted: Sun Oct 09, 2011 6:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Marty,
Sudoku Susser solves it with a classic remote pair.
Keith |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marty R.
Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
|
Posted: Sun Oct 09, 2011 8:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | Sudoku Susser solves it with a classic remote pair. |
I'm not familiar with a "Classic" Remote Pairs. I assume it has something to do with the number of cells involved. I now notice that a four-cell Remote Pairs sets r3c9<>26, so my eight-cell wasn't necessary. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
arkietech
Joined: 31 Jul 2008 Posts: 1834 Location: Northwest Arkansas USA
|
Posted: Sun Oct 09, 2011 9:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Code: | *--------------------------------------------------*
| 9 1 5 | 3 26 4 | 7 *26 8 |
| 26 7 4 | 8 26 9 | 1 5 3 |
| 8 *26 3 | 7 1 5 | 4 29-6 29-6 |
|----------------+----------------+----------------|
| 5 3 8 | 1 4 2 | 69 7 69 |
| 7 9 6 | 5 8 3 | 2 1 4 |
| 1 4 2 | 6 9 7 | 8 3 5 |
|----------------+----------------+----------------|
| 3 #26 1 | 4 5 8 | 69 #269 7 |
| 4 5 9 | 2 7 6 | 3 8 1 |
| 26 8 7 | 9 3 1 | 5 4 26 |
*--------------------------------------------------*
w-wing 62 linked by 2 in row 7 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marty R.
Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
|
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2011 12:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
How about an M-Wing on 26 with pincers in r1c2 and r9c9; r3c9<>2. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
keith
Joined: 19 Sep 2005 Posts: 3355 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marty R.
Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
|
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2011 3:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | A "classic" remote pair is a chain of cells all of which have the same pair of unknowns. Strong links in both candidates. |
Based on that definition, wouldn't my eight-cell chain qualify, even though it turned out to unnecessary? All eight cells contain just 26. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
keith
Joined: 19 Sep 2005 Posts: 3355 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
|
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2011 12:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Marty R. wrote: | Quote: | A "classic" remote pair is a chain of cells all of which have the same pair of unknowns. Strong links in both candidates. |
Based on that definition, wouldn't my eight-cell chain qualify, even though it turned out to unnecessary? All eight cells contain just 26. | Marty,
Yes. After basics: Code: | +-------------+-------------+-------------+
| 9 1 5 | 3 26 4 | 7 26 8 |
| 26 7 4 | 8 26 9 | 1 5 3 |
| 8 26 3 | 7 1 5 | 4 269 269 |
+-------------+-------------+-------------+
| 5 3 8 | 1 4 2 | 69 7 69 |
| 7 9 6 | 5 8 3 | 2 1 4 |
| 1 4 2 | 6 9 7 | 8 3 5 |
+-------------+-------------+-------------+
| 3 26 1 | 4 5 8 | 69 269 7 |
| 4 5 9 | 2 7 6 | 3 8 1 |
| 26 8 7 | 9 3 1 | 5 4 26 |
+-------------+-------------+-------------+
| Keith |
|
Back to top |
|
|
daj95376
Joined: 23 Aug 2008 Posts: 3854
|
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2011 9:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
<69> DP in [stack 3] _ => _ r1c8<>2
Code: | +-------------+-------------+-----------------+
| 9 1 5 | 3 26 4 | 7 6-2 8 |
| 26 7 4 | 8 26 9 | 1 5 3 |
| 8 26 3 | 7 1 5 | 4 *69+2 *69+2 |
+-------------+-------------+-----------------+
| 5 3 8 | 1 4 2 | *69 7 *69 |
| 7 9 6 | 5 8 3 | 2 1 4 |
| 1 4 2 | 6 9 7 | 8 3 5 |
+-------------+-------------+-----------------+
| 3 26 1 | 4 5 8 | *69 *69+2 7 |
| 4 5 9 | 2 7 6 | 3 8 1 |
| 26 8 7 | 9 3 1 | 5 4 26 |
+-------------+-------------+-----------------+
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|