View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
arkietech
Joined: 31 Jul 2008 Posts: 1834 Location: Northwest Arkansas USA
|
Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2011 8:23 pm Post subject: RH 110111 |
|
|
Code: | *-----------*
|67.|...|2..|
|..4|..6|..3|
|2.3|.19|...|
|---+---+---|
|...|..4|..8|
|.3.|865|.9.|
|8..|9..|...|
|---+---+---|
|...|65.|3.4|
|4..|3..|8..|
|..1|...|.26|
*-----------* |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
SudoQ
Joined: 02 Aug 2011 Posts: 127
|
Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2011 10:17 pm Post subject: Re: RH 110111 |
|
|
Hi arkietech,
I think that this is an advanced one stepper!
/SudoQ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
arkietech
Joined: 31 Jul 2008 Posts: 1834 Location: Northwest Arkansas USA
|
Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2011 10:53 pm Post subject: Re: RH 110111 |
|
|
SudoQ wrote: | I think that this is an advanced one stepper! |
It can be solved with multiple advanced steps with no chains, patterns, fins, or "almosts".
It can also be solved with one step using a chain. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marty R.
Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
|
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2011 12:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
I thought I had a one-stepper, but not quite.
XY-Wing (179), flightless, pivot r7c8, transport 9 from r8c9 to r1c3; r2c1, r7c3<>9
Remote Pairs (27), 6-cell; r8c3<>27=6 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
arkietech
Joined: 31 Jul 2008 Posts: 1834 Location: Northwest Arkansas USA
|
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2011 12:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Code: | *--------------------------------------------------------------------*
| 6 7 e589 | 45 348 38 | 2 c1458 d19 |
| 5-9 1 4 | 2 78 6 | 579 578 3 |
| 2 58 3 | 457 1 9 | 567 45678 57 |
|----------------------+----------------------+----------------------|
| 579 269 25679 | 1 237 4 | 567 3567 8 |
| 1 3 27 | 8 6 5 | 4 9 27 |
| 8 4 2567 | 9 237 237 | 1 3567 257 |
|----------------------+----------------------+----------------------|
|a79 29 278-9 | 6 5 1278 | 3 b17 4 |
| 4 26 2567 | 3 279 127 | 8 157 19 |
| 3 58 1 | 47 4789 78 | 579 2 6 |
*--------------------------------------------------------------------*
(9=7)r7c1-(7=1)r7c8-(1)r1c8=(1-9)r1c9=(9)r1c3 => r2c1,r7c3<>9 |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
JC Van Hay
Joined: 13 Jun 2010 Posts: 494 Location: Charleroi, Belgium
|
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2011 1:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Easy SE 6.6 puzzle !
So, just for the fun ...
Code: | +----------------------+------------------+------------------+
| 6 7 58(9) | 45 348 38 | 2 1458 1(9) |
| 5(9) 1 4 | 2 78 6 | 579 578 3 |
| 2 58 3 | 457 1 9 | 567 45678 57 |
+----------------------+------------------+------------------+
| 579 69(2) 5679(2) | 1 37(2) 4 | 567 3567 8 |
| 1 3 (27) | 8 6 5 | 4 9 27 |
| 8 4 2567 | 9 237 237 | 1 3567 257 |
+----------------------+------------------+------------------+
| (79) 29 2789 | 6 5 1278 | 3 17 4 |
| 4 26 256-7 | 3 (279) 127 | 8 157 1(9) |
| 3 58 1 | 47 4789 78 | 579 2 6 |
+----------------------+------------------+------------------+
(7=2)r5c3-2r4c23=2r4c5-2r8c5=[RP(79)r7c1,r8c5 connected by ER(9C9B1)]
=> SIS(7r5c3,7r7c1,7r8c5) => -7r8c3 |
JC |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marty R.
Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
|
Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2011 7:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | (9=7)r7c1-(7=1)r7c8-(1)r1c8=(1-9)r1c9=(9)r1c3 => r2c1,r7c3<>9 |
Dan, I don't know if that notation represents an AIC or XY-Wing, but it's the same as my XY-Wing with pincer transport. However, it looks like you're staying it's a one-stepper whereas I didn't see how to finish it off without another move. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|