View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
arkietech
Joined: 31 Jul 2008 Posts: 1834 Location: Northwest Arkansas USA
|
Posted: Sat Mar 03, 2012 9:29 pm Post subject: au 3/3/12 tough |
|
|
Code: | *-----------*
|...|..7|...|
|.3.|..1|.6.|
|...|.8.|72.|
|---+---+---|
|..4|.76|...|
|..9|...|5..|
|...|12.|8..|
|---+---+---|
|.52|.3.|...|
|.8.|6..|.9.|
|...|4..|...|
*-----------*
*-----------------------------------------------------------*
| 125 4 158 | 29 6 7 | 19 5-8 3 |
| 27 3 7-8 | 29 5 1 | 4 6 89 |
| 156 9 156 | 3 8 4 | 7 2 15 |
|-------------------+-------------------+-------------------|
| 8 12 4 | 5 7 6 | 19 3 129 |
| 167 1267 9 | 8 4 3 | 5 17 126 |
| 35 67 35 | 1 2 9 | 8 47 46 |
|-------------------+-------------------+-------------------|
| 9 5 2 | 7 3 8 | 6 14 14 |
| 4 8 37 | 6 1 25 | 23 9 57 |
| 1367 167 1367 | 4 9 25 | 23 58 578 |
*-----------------------------------------------------------*
XY-Chain r8c3<>7 => r1c3= 18
XY-Wing 198 => r1c8,r2c3<>8
(7=8)r2c3-(8-9)r2c9-(9=1)r1c7-(1=5)r3c9-(5=7)r8c9
=> r8c3<>7 => r8c3=3 => r6c3=5 =>
(8=1)r1c3-(9=1)r1c7-(9-8)r2c9 => r1c8,r2c3<>8
Can this be displayed in Eureka notation? or more simply |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
SudoQ
Joined: 02 Aug 2011 Posts: 127
|
Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2012 12:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
Why not a tri-cell for a change!
Code: | r1c3=1 -> =>
=8 -> r1c8=5 -> r3c9=1 =>
=5 -> r6c3=3 -> r8c3=7 -> r8c9=5 -> r3c9=1 => r1c7<>1 |
/SudoQ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
daj95376
Joined: 23 Aug 2008 Posts: 3854
|
Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2012 12:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
Dan: This should come close to what you want. It's a network elimination made to look like a chain. It uses a lasso on cells r1c8 & r3c9. The (*) indicates where memory is used to make the []-chain work.
Code: | +--------------------------------------------------------------+
| 125 4 158 | 29 6 7 | 19 58 3 |
| 27 3 78 | 29 5 1 | 4 6 89 |
| 156 9 156 | 3 8 4 | 7 2 15 |
|--------------------+--------------------+--------------------|
| 8 12 4 | 5 7 6 | 19 3 129 |
| 167 1267 9 | 8 4 3 | 5 17 126 |
| 35 67 35 | 1 2 9 | 8 47 46 |
|--------------------+--------------------+--------------------|
| 9 5 2 | 7 3 8 | 6 14 14 |
| 4 8 37 | 6 1 25 | 23 9 57 |
| 1367 167 1367 | 4 9 25 | 23 58 578 |
+--------------------------------------------------------------+
# 52 eliminations remain
(8*)r1c3=[(5)r1c8=(5-1)r3c9=r1c7-(*81=5)r1c3-(5=3)r6c3-(3=7)r8c3-(7=5)r8c9-r3c9=(5)r1c8]
=> r1c8<>8
________________________________________________________________________________________
|
As a network:
Code: | (5)r1c8=(5-1)r3c9=r1c7-(1=5)r1c3-(5=3)r6c3-(3=7)r8c3-(7=5)r8c9-r3c9=(5)r1c8 => r1c8<>8
||
-(1=8)r1c3 => r1c8<>8
|
Using SudoQ's Kraken Cell: r1c3=158
Code: | (8)r1c3 => r1c8<>8
(5)r1c3-(5=3)r6c3-(3=7)r8c3-(7=5)r8c9-r3c9=(5)r1c8 => r1c8<>8
(1)r1c3-r1c7=(1=5)r3c9=(5)r1c8 => r1c8<>8
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marty R.
Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
|
Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2012 1:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Dan, I don't know if you were looking for other solutions or just an answer to your question. I certainly can't answer the question.
XY-Wing (375), pivot r8c3, flightless with transport; r1c3<>5
XY-Wing (581), pivot r1c8; r1c7<>1 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
JC Van Hay
Joined: 13 Jun 2010 Posts: 494 Location: Charleroi, Belgium
|
Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2012 8:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
Also, written as a 7-SIS AAIC or AXYChain :
8r1c3=XY Chain[(1=5)r1c3-(5=3)r6c3-(3=7)r8c3-(7=5)r8c9-(5=1)r3c9]-(1=9)r1c7-(9=8)r2c9 => 8r1c3=8r2c9 => -8r2c3.r1c8 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
arkietech
Joined: 31 Jul 2008 Posts: 1834 Location: Northwest Arkansas USA
|
Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2012 11:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
Marty R. wrote: | Dan, I don't know if you were looking for other solutions or just an answer to your question. I certainly can't answer the question.
XY-Wing (375), pivot r8c3, flightless with transport; r1c3<>5
XY-Wing (581), pivot r1c8; r1c7<>1 | I and others can learn from all answers. Thanks.
With the help of JC's
(8)r1c3=XY Chain[(1=5)r1c3-(5=3)r6c3-(3=7)r8c3-(7=5)r8c9-(5=1)r3c9]-(1=9)r1c7-(9=8)r2c9 => r1c8<>8
I have attempted to show Marty's in Eureka notation:
(1=58)r1c3-(5=3)r6c13-(3=7)r8c3-(7=5)r8c9-(5=1)r3c9 => r1c7<>1
If this is right Marty's is much simpler.
JC and Marty you have made my day! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
JC Van Hay
Joined: 13 Jun 2010 Posts: 494 Location: Charleroi, Belgium
|
Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2012 1:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
arkietech wrote: | I have attempted to show Marty's in Eureka notation:
(1=[58)r1c38-(5=3)r6c3-(3=7)r8c3-(7=5)r8c9]-(5=1)r3c9 => r1c7<>1
If this is right Marty's is much simpler. |
To avoid a too condensed notation, I would have written, using [] to isolate the XY Chain ...
1r1c3=XY Chain[(5=8)r1c8-(8=5)r1c3-(5=3)r6c3-(3=7)r8c3-(7=5)r8c9]-(5=1)r3c9 => -1r1c7.r3c13
Best regards, JC. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ronk
Joined: 07 May 2006 Posts: 398
|
Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2012 1:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
arkietech wrote: | I have attempted to show Marty's in Eureka notation:
(1=58)r1c3-(5=3)r6c13-(3=7)r8c3-(7=5)r8c9-(5=1)r3c9 => r1c7<>1
If this is right Marty's is much simpler. |
Without any intermediate exclusions, I don't see anything quite that simple. Using JC's notation for a kraken cell on a single line ...
(1)*r1c3=xy-chain[(5=8)r1c8-(8=5)*r1c3-(5=3)r6c3-(3=7)r8c3-(7=5)r8c9]-(5=1)r3c9 ==> (1)r1c3=(1)r3c9 ==> r1c7,r3c13<>1
The '*' highlights the usage and appearances of a tri-valued cell. Counting this as a single SIS, a 6-SIS is required compared to a 7-SIS stated elsewhere, so this could be said to be simpler.
However, Marty's two AICs with an intermediate exclusion require only seven strong inferences, four for the transported xy-wing and three for the other xy-wing. IMO it's considerably easier to understand his two xy-wings than the single AAIC written above. IOW I don't really understand the obsession to express puzzle solutions as a single step. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
arkietech
Joined: 31 Jul 2008 Posts: 1834 Location: Northwest Arkansas USA
|
Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2012 2:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ronk wrote: | IOW I don't really understand the obsession to express puzzle solutions as a single step. |
It keeps my mind from growing stale.
and besides it is fun. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
JC Van Hay
Joined: 13 Jun 2010 Posts: 494 Location: Charleroi, Belgium
|
Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2012 2:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
ronk wrote: | ... I don't really understand the obsession to express puzzle solutions as a single step. |
In this particular puzzle, it is true that it is very hard to "beat" a 2 Wings (totalizing 6-SIS) solution (MW + HW or XYW) |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|