View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
arkietech
Joined: 31 Jul 2008 Posts: 1834 Location: Northwest Arkansas USA
|
Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 4:52 am Post subject: Vanhegan fiendish October 12, 2012 |
|
|
Code: |
*-----------*
|168|...|.73|
|4..|3..|...|
|..9|6..|2.1|
|---+---+---|
|6..|.7.|.9.|
|..5|...|8..|
|.9.|.2.|..6|
|---+---+---|
|9.6|..2|5..|
|...|..1|..9|
|57.|...|312|
*-----------*
|
Play/Print this puzzle online |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tlanglet
Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Posts: 2468 Location: Northern California Foothills
|
Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 1:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Code after basics: Code: | *--------------------------------------------------*
| 1 6 8 | 2 459 459 | 49 7 3 |
| 4 25 27 | 3 1 79 | 69 56 8 |
| 37 35 9 | 6 48 478 | 2 45 1 |
|----------------+----------------+----------------|
| 6 24 12 | 8 7 3 | 14 9 5 |
| 37 34 5 | 1 69 69 | 8 2 47 |
| 8 9 17 | 45 2 45 | 17 3 6 |
|----------------+----------------+----------------|
| 9 1 6 | 47 3 2 | 5 8 47 |
| 2 8 3 | 457 45 1 | 467 46 9 |
| 5 7 4 | 9 68 68 | 3 1 2 |
*--------------------------------------------------*
|
Here is one for Keith.
(4=9)r1c7-BugLite(45) r168c456[(9)r1c56=(7)r8c4]-(7=4)r7c4-r7c9=r5c9 => -4r4c6
Ted |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marty R.
Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
|
Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 5:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Code: | *-------------------------------------------------------*
| 1 6 8 | 2 459 459 | A49 7 3 |
| 4 25 27 | 3 1 79 | 69 56 8 |
| 37 35 9 | 6 48 478 | 2 45 1 |
|----------------+----------------+--------------------|
| 6 24 12 | 8 7 3 | B14 9 5 |
| 37 34 5 | 1 69 69 | 8 2 C47 |
| 8 9 17 | 45 2 45 | 17 3 6 |
|----------------+----------------+--------------------|
| 9 1 6 | F47 3 2 | 5 8 D47 |
| 2 8 3 | -457 -45 1 | E467 E46 9 |
| 5 7 4 | 9 68 68 | 3 1 2 |
*------------------------------------------------------* |
I also played the BUG-Lite. Either A or F=4 due to the 9s in r1 or the 7 in r8c4. Transport 4 from r1c7 to r8c78 via ABCDE; r8c45<>4. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marty R.
Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
|
Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 6:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
tlanglet wrote: | Code after basics: Code: | *--------------------------------------------------*
| 1 6 8 | 2 459 459 | 49 7 3 |
| 4 25 27 | 3 1 79 | 69 56 8 |
| 37 35 9 | 6 48 478 | 2 45 1 |
|----------------+----------------+----------------|
| 6 24 12 | 8 7 3 | 14 9 5 |
| 37 34 5 | 1 69 69 | 8 2 47 |
| 8 9 17 | 45 2 45 | 17 3 6 |
|----------------+----------------+----------------|
| 9 1 6 | 47 3 2 | 5 8 47 |
| 2 8 3 | 457 45 1 | 467 46 9 |
| 5 7 4 | 9 68 68 | 3 1 2 |
*--------------------------------------------------*
|
Here is one for Keith.
(4=9)r1c7-BugLite(45) r168c456[(9)r1c56=(7)r8c4]-(7=4)r7c4-r7c9=r5c9 => -4r4c6
Ted |
Ted,
There's no 4 in r4c6. May I ask where the elimination occurs and what are the pincers? Just trying to see if I can interpret the notation. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
keith
Joined: 19 Sep 2005 Posts: 3355 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
|
Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 7:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Code: | +-------------+-------------+-------------+
| 1 6 8 | 2 B459 B459|A49 7 3 |
| 4 25 27 | 3 1 79 | 69 56 8 |
| 37 35 9 | 6 48 478 | 2 45 1 |
+-------------+-------------+-------------+
| 6 24 12 | 8 7 3 |1-4 9 5 |
| 37 34 5 | 1 69 69 | 8 2 F47 |
| 8 9 17 | 45 2 45 | 17 3 6 |
+-------------+-------------+-------------+
| 9 1 6 |D47 3 2 | 5 8 E47 |
| 2 8 3 |C457 45 1 | 467 46 9 |
| 5 7 4 | 9 68 68 | 3 1 2 |
+-------------+-------------+-------------+ |
Marty,
DP 45 in R168C456.
BC are <79>.
ABCD is an XY-wing 49-79-47. With transport EF, R4C7 <>4.
Keith |
|
Back to top |
|
|
arkietech
Joined: 31 Jul 2008 Posts: 1834 Location: Northwest Arkansas USA
|
Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 7:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
keith wrote: | ABCD is an XY-wing 49-79-47. With transport EF, R4C7 <>4.
|
I like it
here is a cousin:
Code: |
*--------------------------------------------------*
| 1 6 8 | 2 459 459 |a49 7 3 |
| 4 b25 27 | 3 1 79 |b69 b56 8 |
| 37 35 9 | 6 48 478 | 2 45 1 |
|----------------+----------------+----------------|
| 6 c24 12 | 8 7 3 | 1-4 9 5 |
| 37 34 5 | 1 69 69 | 8 2 47 |
| 8 9 17 | 45 2 45 | 17 3 6 |
|----------------+----------------+----------------|
| 9 1 6 | 47 3 2 | 5 8 47 |
| 2 8 3 | 457 45 1 | 467 46 9 |
| 5 7 4 | 9 68 68 | 3 1 2 |
*--------------------------------------------------*
(4=9)r1c7-(9=2)als:r2c278-(2=4)r4c2 => -4r4c7; stte
|
Play/Print this puzzle online |
|
Back to top |
|
|
keith
Joined: 19 Sep 2005 Posts: 3355 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
|
Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 9:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Except for a typo, my solution is the same as Ted's. I was simply trying to give Marty a different explanation. A decoder ring for the notation, if you will.
Keith |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Luke451
Joined: 20 Apr 2008 Posts: 310 Location: Southern Northern California
|
Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 9:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
arkietech wrote: | here is a cousin:
Code: |
*--------------------------------------------------*
| 1 6 8 | 2 459 459 |a49 7 3 |
| 4 b25 27 | 3 1 79 |b69 b56 8 |
| 37 35 9 | 6 48 478 | 2 45 1 |
|----------------+----------------+----------------|
| 6 c24 12 | 8 7 3 | 1-4 9 5 |
| 37 34 5 | 1 69 69 | 8 2 47 |
| 8 9 17 | 45 2 45 | 17 3 6 |
|----------------+----------------+----------------|
| 9 1 6 | 47 3 2 | 5 8 47 |
| 2 8 3 | 457 45 1 | 467 46 9 |
| 5 7 4 | 9 68 68 | 3 1 2 |
*--------------------------------------------------*
(4=9)r1c7-(9=2)als:r2c278-(2=4)r4c2 => -4r4c7; stte
|
Play/Print this puzzle online |
Hi, Dan. I know you're just trying to "wing" it when you throw in an als like this, but an xy-chain is still just an xy-chain.
Oh, and nice BUG-Lite, guys! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marty R.
Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
|
Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 9:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I see in light of the comments that I could have transported either pincer and my transport could have been shorter.
The result is the same, but I would never in a million years spot that pattern as an XY-Wing. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
arkietech
Joined: 31 Jul 2008 Posts: 1834 Location: Northwest Arkansas USA
|
Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 11:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Luke451 wrote: | Hi, Dan. I know you're just trying to "wing" it when you throw in an als like this, but an xy-chain is still just an xy-chain. |
Looking at it another way an xy-chain with three xy's is an xy-wing. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tlanglet
Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Posts: 2468 Location: Northern California Foothills
|
Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2012 1:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
Marty R. wrote: | tlanglet wrote: | Code after basics: Code: | *--------------------------------------------------*
| 1 6 8 | 2 459 459 | 49 7 3 |
| 4 25 27 | 3 1 79 | 69 56 8 |
| 37 35 9 | 6 48 478 | 2 45 1 |
|----------------+----------------+----------------|
| 6 24 12 | 8 7 3 | 14 9 5 |
| 37 34 5 | 1 69 69 | 8 2 47 |
| 8 9 17 | 45 2 45 | 17 3 6 |
|----------------+----------------+----------------|
| 9 1 6 | 47 3 2 | 5 8 47 |
| 2 8 3 | 457 45 1 | 467 46 9 |
| 5 7 4 | 9 68 68 | 3 1 2 |
*--------------------------------------------------*
|
Here is one for Keith.
(4=9)r1c7-BugLite(45) r168c456[(9)r1c56=(7)r8c4]-(7=4)r7c4-r7c9=r5c9 => -4r4c6
Ted |
Ted,
There's no 4 in r4c6. May I ask where the elimination occurs and what are the pincers? Just trying to see if I can interpret the notation. |
Marty, sorry about the confusion. My pincers are 4r1c7 and 4r5c9 which deletes the 4 in r4c7, not r4c6. I could claim a typo or insufficient coffee early in the morning but in either case I messed-up.
Ted |
|
Back to top |
|
|
aran
Joined: 19 Apr 2010 Posts: 70
|
Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2012 3:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
arkietech wrote: | Luke451 wrote: | Hi, Dan. I know you're just trying to "wing" it when you throw in an als like this, but an xy-chain is still just an xy-chain. |
Looking at it another way an xy-chain with three xy's is an xy-wing. |
arkitech
On the use of ALS in your formulation : (4=9)r1c7-(9=2)als:r2c278-(2=4)r4c2 => -4r4c7 :
...I would argue that there is no ALS...
That is, when =9r1c7 is posited, the once ALS on the board mutates into an LS (here a resolved LS) in the chain.
In other words
(4=9)r1c7-(9=2)LSr2c278-(2=4)r4c2 => -4r4c7
would better reflect the position, though still putting the relevant information (LS) after the deduction (2r2c2) and still leaving the reader to make that deduction.
One way of making things clearer whilst respecting the logical sequence would be for example :
(4=9)r1c7-9r2c7=(56+2)r2c782-(2=4)r4c2 => -4r4c7
where+is a sign of resolution, and the ordering of the LS indicates which is the resolved cell of interest. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
arkietech
Joined: 31 Jul 2008 Posts: 1834 Location: Northwest Arkansas USA
|
Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2012 5:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
aran wrote: | arkietech wrote: | Luke451 wrote: | Hi, Dan. I know you're just trying to "wing" it when you throw in an als like this, but an xy-chain is still just an xy-chain. |
Looking at it another way an xy-chain with three xy's is an xy-wing. |
arkitech
On the use of ALS in your formulation : (4=9)r1c7-(9=2)als:r2c278-(2=4)r4c2 => -4r4c7 :
...I would argue that there is no ALS...
That is, when =9r1c7 is posited, the once ALS on the board mutates into an LS (here a resolved LS) in the chain.
In other words
(4=9)r1c7-(9=2)LSr2c278-(2=4)r4c2 => -4r4c7
would better reflect the position, though still putting the relevant information (LS) after the deduction (2r2c2) and still leaving the reader to make that deduction.
One way of making things clearer whilst respecting the logical sequence would be for example :
(4=9)r1c7-9r2c7=(56+2)r2c782-(2=4)r4c2 => -4r4c7
where+is a sign of resolution, and the ordering of the LS indicates which is the resolved cell of interest. |
How can r2c278 be a locked set when it is three cells with four values (2569)? Pulling the 9 out will make it a locked set but the notation indicates the 9 is there. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|