View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Clement
Joined: 24 Apr 2006 Posts: 1111 Location: Dar es Salaam Tanzania
|
Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2012 11:02 pm Post subject: Nov 17 VH |
|
|
Code: |
+-------------+---------+-----------+
| 1 6 23 | 23 4 9 | 8 7 5 |
| 7 45 245 | 6 1 8 | 9 24 3 |
| *248 9 -2348 | -23 5 7 | -246 1 *26 |
+-------------+---------+-----------+
| *24 1 6 | 5 9 3 | 7 8 *24 |
| 9 3 28 | 7 68 4 | 26 5 1 |
| 458 7 458 | 1 68 2 | 3 9 46 |
+-------------+---------+-----------+
| 3 8 9 | 4 2 5 | 1 6 7 |
| 6 45 7 | 8 3 1 | 245 24 9 |
| 45 2 1 | 9 7 6 | 45 3 8 |
+-------------+---------+-----------+
| X-Wing on 2 in col 19; r3c347<>2 opens an
XY-Wing 24-28-48 pivoted in r5c3; r3c1<>4, r6c3<>4 solves it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
George Woods
Joined: 28 Mar 2006 Posts: 304 Location: Dorset UK
|
Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2012 11:13 am Post subject: another almost an xy! |
|
|
I didn't spot the x wing in 2s but used the xwing in 4s (cols 2 and 8 ) so r2c3 is not 4 and this set up an amost Xy wing pivoted in r5c3. so if r6c1 is not 4 it becomes 5 via the xy wing 258. else it is 4- so it cannot be 8 so r3c1 is 8 and this solves it! This logic can be tested by setting r6c1 to 8 and in two moves we can see that it is wrong since there is then no 5 in box 4
corrected after reading thecomment below thank you---george
Last edited by George Woods on Sat Nov 17, 2012 5:15 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tlanglet
Joined: 17 Oct 2007 Posts: 2468 Location: Northern California Foothills
|
Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2012 2:42 pm Post subject: Re: another almost an xy! |
|
|
George Woods wrote: | I didn't spot the x wing in 2s but used the xwing in 4s (cols 2 and 8 so r2c3 is not 4 and this set up an amost Xy wing pivoted in r5c3. so if r1c6 is not 4 it becomes 5 via the xy wing 258. else it is 4- so it cannot be 8 so r3c1 is 8 and this solves it! This logic can be tested by setting r1c6 to 8 and in two moves we can see that it is wrong since there is then no 5 in box 4 |
George,
Nice find. I never expected anyone to use an "almost" pattern on this site, but they are easy to spot and very useful.
Your last comment about setting r6c1=8 (you had a typo: r1c6) is sufficient to complete the puzzle; the x-wing(4) is not required.
Ted |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Clement
Joined: 24 Apr 2006 Posts: 1111 Location: Dar es Salaam Tanzania
|
Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 1:30 pm Post subject: Nov 17 VH |
|
|
George Woods
You have a different Grid from mine after basics? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
George Woods
Joined: 28 Mar 2006 Posts: 304 Location: Dorset UK
|
Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 2:14 pm Post subject: different grid |
|
|
yes - after the x wing in 4s r2c3 is 25 hence the almost an xy wing and of course I didn't have the removal of 2s from your x wing in 2! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rebkell
Joined: 18 Nov 2012 Posts: 5
|
Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 5:53 pm Post subject: Re: Nov 17 VH |
|
|
Clement wrote: | Code: |
+-------------+---------+-----------+
| 1 6 23 | 23 4 9 | 8 7 5 |
| 7 45 245 | 6 1 8 | 9 24 3 |
| *248 9 -2348 | -23 5 7 | -246 1 *26 |
+-------------+---------+-----------+
| *24 1 6 | 5 9 3 | 7 8 *24 |
| 9 3 28 | 7 68 4 | 26 5 1 |
| 458 7 458 | 1 68 2 | 3 9 46 |
+-------------+---------+-----------+
| 3 8 9 | 4 2 5 | 1 6 7 |
| 6 45 7 | 8 3 1 | 245 24 9 |
| 45 2 1 | 9 7 6 | 45 3 8 |
+-------------+---------+-----------+
| X-Wing on 2 in col 19; r3c347<>2 opens an
XY-Wing 24-28-48 pivoted in r5c3; r3c1<>4, r6c3<>4 solves it. |
I'm still having problems solving this after all the x-wing, xy wing I come up with this and I'm just a dunce, but I can't figure out how to solve it from here.
Code: |
+------------+--------+------------+
| 1 6 3 | 2 4 9 | 8 7 5 |
| 7 45 245 | 6 1 8 | 9 24 3 |
| 28 9 48 | 3 5 7 | 46 1 246 |
+------------+--------+------------+
| 24 1 6 | 5 9 3 | 7 8 24 |
| 9 3 28 | 7 68 4 | 26 5 1 |
| 458 7 58 | 1 68 2 | 3 9 46 |
+------------+--------+------------+
| 3 8 9 | 4 2 5 | 1 6 7 |
| 6 45 7 | 8 3 1 | 245 24 9 |
| 45 2 1 | 9 7 6 | 45 3 8 |
+------------+--------+------------+
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
kuskey
Joined: 10 Dec 2008 Posts: 141 Location: Pembroke, NH
|
Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 7:03 pm Post subject: Nov 17 VH |
|
|
rebkell:
I see a 458 xy wing with pivot at r3c3 which makes r2c3<>5. This reveals a naked pair <24> in r2, setting r2c2<>4. Barring previous mistakes you should be off and running. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rebkell
Joined: 18 Nov 2012 Posts: 5
|
Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2012 8:21 pm Post subject: Re: Nov 17 VH |
|
|
kuskey wrote: | rebkell:
I see a 458 xy wing with pivot at r3c3 which makes r2c3<>5. This reveals a naked pair <24> in r2, setting r2c2<>4. Barring previous mistakes you should be off and running. |
Thanks, that did it, I should have seen that. I wasn't expecting another xy-wing I guess. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Clement
Joined: 24 Apr 2006 Posts: 1111 Location: Dar es Salaam Tanzania
|
Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 1:29 pm Post subject: Nov 17 VH |
|
|
rebkell wrote
''I'm still having problems solving this after all the x-wing, xy wing I come up with this and I'm just a dunce, but I can't figure out how to solve it from here''.
You are right, an x-wing on 4 in row 46; r9c1<>4 was needed to comlete it. Sorry for the inconvinience |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|