View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
BobbieTheWiz Guest
|
Posted: Tue May 09, 2006 4:19 pm Post subject: May 9th – a real cracker...! |
|
|
I spent a couple of hours with the May 9th puzzle. I had to crack 3 (three) X-wings (a.k.a unique rectangles) to solve it.
My question is: did I go about it the wrong way? Started with the wrong one, perhaps? Or was it in fact necessary to find those three different X-wings to crack this puzzle? Would be nice to hear other opinions about this. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marty R.
Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
|
Posted: Tue May 09, 2006 4:56 pm Post subject: Re: May 9th – a real cracker...! |
|
|
BobbieTheWiz wrote: | I spent a couple of hours with the May 9th puzzle. I had to crack 3 (three) X-wings (a.k.a unique rectangles) to solve it.
My question is: did I go about it the wrong way? Started with the wrong one, perhaps? Or was it in fact necessary to find those three different X-wings to crack this puzzle? Would be nice to hear other opinions about this. |
I haven't done the puzzle, so I can't comment on the specifics. However, X-Wings and unique rectangles are two different things. Here is Keith's excellent primer on rectangles:
http://www.dailysudoku.co.uk/sudoku/forums/viewtopic.php?t=744
If you arrived at the correct solution, I don't think you went about it the wrong way, although it's quite possible that you didn't see the quickest way. From reading this forum, I quickly learned that there are multiple approaches and techniques that will lead to the correct solution on many, if not most, puzzles. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Angel
Joined: 26 Mar 2006 Posts: 31
|
Posted: Tue May 09, 2006 5:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Bobbie, I needed one X-wing to complete the puzzle. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
keith
Joined: 19 Sep 2005 Posts: 3355 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
|
Posted: Tue May 09, 2006 5:42 pm Post subject: Not yet complete ... |
|
|
I have not finished the puzzle, but there is a Unique Rectangle that has two types of eliminations.
Keith |
|
Back to top |
|
|
BobbieTheWiz Guest
|
Posted: Tue May 09, 2006 5:45 pm Post subject: wings |
|
|
Thanks, Marty, for clearing that up. I meant I needed to crack three different X-wings. And thanks Angel, for your reply. I think I know what that singular X-wing was. Involving 2:s, right? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marty R.
Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
|
Posted: Tue May 09, 2006 6:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have since done the puzzle and the standard techniques of pairs, triples, hidden singles and locked candidates were enough to complete it. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Angel
Joined: 26 Mar 2006 Posts: 31
|
Posted: Tue May 09, 2006 6:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Bobbie - Yes!
Marty - I'll need to try again, the way I did it definitely needed the X-wing!
Keith - I'm not really into URs, so didn't notice anything! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Korky
Joined: 29 Mar 2006 Posts: 13 Location: Sheffield, UK
|
Posted: Thu May 11, 2006 12:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm a little bemused by the theme of this thread. The puzzle is solved without the use of any of the techniques mentioned.
After you have entered all of the "obvious " numbers, you deduce, by elimination, that the numbers in R1C1 and R2C1 must be 2 and 6. You then observe where in column 9 where 2,5 and 7 can't be, therefore where they must be, and what numbers must be where the aforesaid 2,5 and 7 aren't.
Are you with me so far? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
keith
Joined: 19 Sep 2005 Posts: 3355 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
|
Posted: Thu May 11, 2006 12:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
Korky,
What is happening here is that the previous two "very difficult" puzzles on this site required X-wings, and also had Unique Rectangles. Before that, no puzzle needed these techniques.
So, everyone was looking for the X-wings and rectangles in this puzzle! Which I think is OK. Why ignore the obvious rectangle, even though there may yet be a difficult hidden single or pair?
Keith |
|
Back to top |
|
|
BobbieTheWiz Guest
|
Posted: Thu May 11, 2006 1:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Korky may be "bemused", but there are actually many ways to crack a puzzle. I was looking for X-wings (for the exact reason Keith just brought up) and found them... and, sure, this may very well be somewhat like... eh... eating food with sticks when there are knives, forks and spoons avaiable... but that's fine with me! Happy sudoking, everyone! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Glassman
Joined: 21 Oct 2005 Posts: 50 Location: England
|
Posted: Thu Jun 22, 2006 10:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
Marty R. wrote: | I have since done the puzzle and the standard techniques of pairs, triples, hidden singles and locked candidates were enough to complete it. |
Same here — I just looked for and found pairs and triples as normal, although there were many more than usual, many interlocking. The puzzle seemed to solve with no difficulty, and without having to resort to "uniquity", i.e. by assuming uniqueness of the solution, which would have allowed me to eliminate the 5 from r8c8 and r9c8.
Glassman |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|