View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
sctprog
Joined: 29 Jun 2016 Posts: 2
|
Posted: Wed Jun 29, 2016 10:27 pm Post subject: Trouble understanding sashimi fish |
|
|
I'm having a bit of trouble understanding sashimi fish. Here's an example board:
Code: |
+------------+-----------+-----------+
| 7 369 28 | 1 28 4 | 5 369 69 |
| 39 389 4 | 5 28 6 | 7 139 129 |
| 26 1 5 | 37 9 37 | 4 26 8 |
+------------+-----------+-----------+
| 8 2 36 | 347 5 37 | 1 69 469 |
| 49 49 1 | 2 6 8 | 3 5 7 |
| 5 7 36 | 34 1 9 | 2 8 46 |
+------------+-----------+-----------+
| 146 46 7 | 8 3 2 | 9 14 5 |
| 13 38 28 | 9 4 5 | 6 7 12 |
| 24 5 9 | 6 7 1 | 8 24 3 |
+------------+-----------+-----------+
|
By my understanding, there is a sashimi x-wing for candidate 2 on row 2, c5/c9 and row 8 c3/c9 allowing elimination from r1c3.
This isn't actually a valid elimination but I don't know why. Would someone be willing to explain it please?
Thanks! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marty R.
Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
|
Posted: Thu Jun 30, 2016 9:59 pm Post subject: Re: Trouble understanding sashimi fish |
|
|
sctprog wrote: | I'm having a bit of trouble understanding sashimi fish. Here's an example board:
Code: |
+------------+-----------+-----------+
| 7 369 28 | 1 28 4 | 5 369 69 |
| 39 389 4 | 5 28 6 | 7 139 129 |
| 26 1 5 | 37 9 37 | 4 26 8 |
+------------+-----------+-----------+
| 8 2 36 | 347 5 37 | 1 69 469 |
| 49 49 1 | 2 6 8 | 3 5 7 |
| 5 7 36 | 34 1 9 | 2 8 46 |
+------------+-----------+-----------+
| 146 46 7 | 8 3 2 | 9 14 5 |
| 13 38 28 | 9 4 5 | 6 7 12 |
| 24 5 9 | 6 7 1 | 8 24 3 |
+------------+-----------+-----------+
|
By my understanding, there is a sashimi x-wing for candidate 2 on row 2, c5/c9 and row 8 c3/c9 allowing elimination from r1c3.
This isn't actually a valid elimination but I don't know why. Would someone be willing to explain it please?
Thanks! |
Since the 2s in r2c9 and r8c9 cannot both be true,either r2c5 or r8c3 MUST be =2 and any 2 that sees both those cells can be eliminated. However, structurally, r2 and 9 form a Skyscraper, not a Sashimi. The latter would normally have three occurrences in one of the rows.
I hope there's something in this thread that might be helpful.
http://www.dailysudoku.co.uk/sudoku/forums/viewtopic.php?t=5390 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
sctprog
Joined: 29 Jun 2016 Posts: 2
|
Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2016 6:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ah I'm using the wrong term. Sudoku 10k+ calls it a Sashimi X-Wing, not a Skyscraper.. but we're talking about the same pattern.
The link you gave explains my misunderstanding though.
Thank you for your reply! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|