View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
keith
Joined: 19 Sep 2005 Posts: 3355 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
|
Posted: Sat Jun 03, 2006 3:21 pm Post subject: DB Saturday Puzzle - June 3, 2006 |
|
|
More difficult than usual:
Code: |
Puzzle: DB060306 ******
+-------+-------+-------+
| 1 9 . | . . 4 | . . 8 |
| . . . | . . . | . . . |
| . 5 . | . 1 . | 2 9 . |
+-------+-------+-------+
| . 6 9 | . . 1 | 4 . . |
| . 8 . | 4 . 3 | . 7 . |
| . . 3 | 9 . . | 8 6 . |
+-------+-------+-------+
| . 4 2 | . 9 . | . 1 . |
| . . . | . . . | . . . |
| 6 . . | 3 . . | . 5 4 |
+-------+-------+-------+
|
Keith |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marty R.
Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
|
Posted: Sat Jun 03, 2006 4:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This was a fun puzzle. It started off generously, with numerous cells able to be solved early. Then things came to a halt and it was some time before I spotted an XY-Wing. After the eliminations therefrom, remote pairs solved a cell. After more eliminations, remote pairs using the same two numbers solved another cell, and that broke open the puzzle.
For me, XY-Wings and remote pairs are more talked about than actually used, so the opportunity to solve a puzzle using both techniques was indeed a treat.
Two thumbs up for DB and two thumbs down for the Pistons. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
keith
Joined: 19 Sep 2005 Posts: 3355 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
|
Posted: Sat Jun 03, 2006 9:04 pm Post subject: I agree! |
|
|
Marty R. wrote: | This was a fun puzzle .... Two thumbs up for DB and two thumbs down for the Pistons. |
Marty,
I agree, this is exactly the kind of puzzle I like to solve. I got to this interesting point:
Code: |
+----------------+----------------+----------------+
| 1 9 67 | 2 57 4 | 567 3 8 |
| 78 2 678 | 567 3 9 | 1567 4 15 |
| 3 5 4 | 678 1 678 | 2 9 67 |
+----------------+----------------+----------------+
| 57 6 9 | 578 578 1 | 4 2 3 |
| 2 8 15a | 4 6 3 | 15 7 9 |
| 4 17b 3 | 9 257 257 | 8 6 15 |
+----------------+----------------+----------------+
| 578 4 2 | 5678 9 5678 | 3 1 67 |
| 9 3 57c | 1 4 567 | 67 8 2 |
| 6 17d 178e | 3 278 278 | 9 5 4 |
+----------------+----------------+----------------+
|
There is an XY-wing on <7> in "a,b,c", so "d" cannot be <7>. But, wait!
There is an XY-wing on <1> in "c,a,d", so "b,e" cannot be <1>.
Note that either of these wings destroys the other one! If you take the reductions from both wings, you eventually get to this neat pattern:
Code: |
+-------------+-------------+-------------+
| 1 9 67 | 2 5 4 | 67 3 8 |
| 78 2 678 | 67 3 9 | 1 4 5 |
| 3 5 4 | 678 1 78 | 2 9 67 |
+-------------+-------------+-------------+
| 5 6 9 | 78 78 1 | 4 2 3 |
| 2 8 1 | 4 6 3 | 5 7 9 |
| 4 7 3 | 9 2 5 | 8 6 1 |
+-------------+-------------+-------------+
| 78 4 2 | 5 9 678 | 3 1 67 |
| 9 3 5 | 1 4 67 | 67 8 2 |
| 6 1 78 | 3 78 2 | 9 5 4 |
+-------------+-------------+-------------+
|
which can be solved with one remote pair. Neato!
It seems to me that Miami, in spite of having a superstar in Shaq, now have more of the "get it done" work ethic the Pistons used to have. Too bad.
Keith |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marty R.
Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
|
Posted: Sat Jun 03, 2006 11:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Keith, I can't re-create my position at any given point, but I'm pretty sure it was the c-a-d XY-Wing that I used to set r6c2=7. Then I used the 67 remote pairs twice to finish it off. In both cases, those pairs set cells = 8. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
keith
Joined: 19 Sep 2005 Posts: 3355 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
|
Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2006 1:32 am Post subject: Confessions |
|
|
Marty,
Yes, I solved it via 1 XY-wing as you did. But, if a puzzle seems interesting, I go back and examine it with Sudokuku Susser. It was the Susser that pointed out (to me) the overlapping XY-wings.
Keith
Last edited by keith on Sun Jun 04, 2006 1:19 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TKiel
Joined: 22 Feb 2006 Posts: 292 Location: Kalamazoo, MI
|
Posted: Sun Jun 04, 2006 1:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
MartyR wrote: | remote pairs are more talked about than actually used |
I agree with you on that Marty, yet this puzzle, as shown in the grid posted by Keith, has two sets of remote pairs, either of which can be used to solve the puzzle.
Thanks for posting these puzzles Keith. The techniques/patterns used to solve them generally seem to be right up my alley and usually it's not just a single move that finally solves the puzzle. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|