View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Marty R.
Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
|
Posted: Sat Jun 10, 2006 6:12 pm Post subject: Unique parallelograms? |
|
|
I have shown only the numbers in one stack which I believe to be relevant to my question.
Do I have to set the upper left cell to "6"? If it is not "6", then it looks like the "deadly pattern." I have seen deadly patterns discussed only within the context of Unique Rectangles; however, should not the same principles apply to any four-cornered figure in two boxes, such as parallelograms and trapezoids?
Code: | --------------
| |
|368 |
| 38 |
--------------
| |
| |
| |
--------------
|38 |
| |
| 38 |
-------------- |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Ruud
Joined: 18 Jan 2006 Posts: 31
|
Posted: Sat Jun 10, 2006 6:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi Marty,
Unique Rectangles exist because they share exactly 2 rows, 2 columns and 2 boxes.
You parallelogram shares 2 boxes, 4 rows and 2 columns. These 2 extra rows give ample opportunity to avoid 2 solutions.
There is a shape that can be used for uniqueness, which is the Unique Swordfish:
Code: | . . .|. X .|. X .
. X .|. . .|. X .
. X .|. X .|. . .
-----+-----+-----
. . .|. . .|. . .
. . .|. . .|. . .
. . .|. . .|. . .
-----+-----+-----
. . .|. . .|. . .
. . .|. . .|. . .
. . .|. . .|. . . |
This shape shares 3 rows, 3 columns and 3 boxes.
Ruud. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marty R.
Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
|
Posted: Sat Jun 10, 2006 9:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks Ruud, you saved me from a heap of frustration, even though I'm not seeing why the parallelogram wouldn't constitute the deadly pattern. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
keith
Joined: 19 Sep 2005 Posts: 3355 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
|
Posted: Sat Jun 10, 2006 10:43 pm Post subject: Parallelograms |
|
|
Marty,
Let's try this. Assume this is a fragment of a solution:
Code: |
----------------
| |
|8 |
| 3 |
----------------
|3 |
| |
| 8 |
----------------
|
We have 3 and 8 in each block, and in each column. Let's add the ones in the rows:
Code: |
----------------
| |
|8 |3
8| 3 |
----------------
|3 | 8
| |
3 | 8 |
----------------
|
Now, interchange 3 and 8 on the corners of your parallelogram:
Code: |
----------------
| |
|3 |3
8| 8 |
----------------
|8 | 8
| |
3 | 3 |
----------------
|
Clearly, this is not a fragment of (another) valid solution.
Keith |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marty R.
Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
|
Posted: Sun Jun 11, 2006 12:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
Keith, thank you. I was going to tell you I still didn't understand, but after staring more, I think I get it. I was sure those 38s were interchangeable, which they appear to be, but I was not considering what was outside the stack. So I guess they're not interchangeable and I'm not going to now suggest that the technique name be changed to "Unique Quadrilaterals." |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|