View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
immpy
Joined: 06 May 2017 Posts: 571
|
Posted: Tue Aug 18, 2020 7:10 pm Post subject: Unfair 081820 |
|
|
Hello all, enjoy the puzzle...
Code: |
+-------+-------+-------+
| 9 1 7 | 2 . . | . . 8 |
| 5 . . | . . . | . . . |
| . . 4 | . 9 1 | . . . |
+-------+-------+-------+
| 7 . . | . 6 . | 9 . . |
| 8 . 6 | 1 . 2 | 5 . . |
| . . 3 | . 7 . | . . 6 |
+-------+-------+-------+
| . . . | 8 2 . | 4 . . |
| . . . | . . . | . . 7 |
| 4 . . | . 3 7 | . 1 5 |
+-------+-------+-------+
|
Play this puzzle online at the Daily Sudoku site
cheers...immp |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dongrave
Joined: 06 Mar 2014 Posts: 568
|
Posted: Wed Aug 19, 2020 2:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Code: |
+-------------+--------------+---------------+
| 9 1 7 | 2 5 346 | 36 346 8 |
| 5 36 2 | 3467 8 346 | 1367 9 14 |
| 36 8 4 | 367 9 1 | 367 5 2 |
+-------------+--------------+---------------+
| 7 245 15 | 35 6 358 | 9 248 14 |
| 8 9 6 | 1 4 2 | 5 7 3 |
| 12 245 3 | 59 7 589 | 128 248 6 |
+-------------+--------------+---------------+
| 136 7 15 | 8 2 56 | 4 36 9 |
| 236 2356 89 | 4569 1 4569 | 2368 2368 7 |
| 4 26 89 | 69 3 7 | 268 1 5 |
+-------------+--------------+---------------+
Is the following Eureka notation right? I modeled it after a recent post of Clement's that did something similar.
I'm trying to represent the following: if r4c3 is not a 1 then it's a 5 and r4c4 is a 3
and then later on that cell r3c4 = 7 because of the -3 from r4c4 and the -6 from r3c1.
Thanks ahead of time for any feedback, Don.
(1=5,3)r4c3,r4c4-(5=24)r46c2-(2=6)r9c2-r2c2=r3c1-(36=7)r3c4-(7=36)r13c7-(36=4)r1c8-(4=1)r2c9 => r4c9<>1; stte.
How is the person reading this supposed to know that the 3 mentioned so much earlier is being referenced for the step '-(36=7)r3c4'?'
Maybe something like the following would be clearer?
(1=5)r4c3[-(5=3)r4c4]
[-(5=24)r46c2-(2=6)r9c2-r2c2=r3c1]
-(36=7)r3c4-(7=36)r13c7-(36=4)r1c8-(4=1)r2c9 => r4c9<>1; stte.
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Clement
Joined: 24 Apr 2006 Posts: 1111 Location: Dar es Salaam Tanzania
|
Posted: Thu Aug 20, 2020 11:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
dongrave wrote: | Code: |
Is the following Eureka notation right? I modeled it after a recent post of Clement's that did something similar.
I'm trying to represent the following: if r4c3 is not a 1 then it's a 5 and r4c4 is a 3
and then later on that cell r3c4 = 7 because of the -3 from r4c4 and the -6 from r3c1.
Thanks ahead of time for any feedback, Don.
(1=5,3)r4c3,r4c4-(5=24)r46c2-(2=6)r9c2-r2c2=r3c1-(36=7)r3c4-(7=36)r13c7-(36=4)r1c8-(4=1)r2c9 => r4c9<>1; stte.
How is the person reading this supposed to know that the 3 mentioned so much earlier is being referenced for the step '-(36=7)r3c4'?'
Maybe something like the following would be clearer?
(1=5)r4c3[-(5=3)r4c4]
[-(5=24)r46c2-(2=6)r9c2-r2c2=r3c1]
-(36=7)r3c4-(7=36)r13c7-(36=4)r1c8-(4=1)r2c9 => r4c9<>1; stte.
|
| Good solution Dongrave, The chain is right as far as I am concerned except for minor modifications. The second term should look like this (5=2|4)r46c2 to show that they appear in pairs and (7=3|6)r13c7 for the same reason.
Up to now the Eureka Notation is not exhaustive to carter for complex chains like this. New symbols are still being suggested/discussed in some forums. When a candidate is needed for reference later it can be marked with a symbol say * or any in the chain or grid. In your chain you could have marked it like (1=5,3*)r4c3, r4c4, then refer it (3*6=7)r3c4. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dongrave
Joined: 06 Mar 2014 Posts: 568
|
Posted: Thu Aug 20, 2020 12:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ah! I see! Thanks for your help Clement! It's much appreciated! Don. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Clement
Joined: 24 Apr 2006 Posts: 1111 Location: Dar es Salaam Tanzania
|
Posted: Thu Aug 20, 2020 4:31 pm Post subject: Unfair 081820 |
|
|
Code: |
+--------------------+-------------------+----------------------+
| 9 1 7 | 2 5 346 |h36 i346 8 |
| 5 36 2 | 3467 8 346 |h1367 9 j14 |
| 36 8 4 | 367 9 1 |h367 5 2 |
+--------------------+-------------------+----------------------+
| 7 m245 ld15 | 35 6 358 | 9 248 k14|
| 8 9 6 | 1 4 2 | 5 7 3 |
|c12 m245 3 | 59 7 589 | 128 248 6 |
+--------------------+-------------------+----------------------+
| 136 7 e15 | 8 2 e56 | 4 36 9 |
|b236 2356 589 | 4569 1 4569 | 2368 2368 7 |
| 4 ba6*-2 89 |f6*9 3 7 |g268 1 5 |
+--------------------+-------------------+----------------------+
|
Just for fun when things get hot
2r9c2 - [(2)r8c1-(6*)r9c2] = (2-1)r6c1 = r4c3 - (1=56)r7c36 - (6*)r9c4 = (6)r9c7 - 123c7 = (6-4)r1c8 = (4-1)r2c9 = r4c9 - (1=5)r4c3 - (5=2|4)r46c2 => - 2r9c2; stte |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|