View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
dejsmith
Joined: 23 Oct 2005 Posts: 42
|
Posted: Thu Jun 29, 2006 6:49 pm Post subject: June 29, Very Hard |
|
|
I agree with Marty from his 6/27 Very Hard post. Some X Wing work & few other things makes Samgj's Very Hards qiuite enjoyable. After the basics, I solved the 6/29 Very Hard with an X Wing on 7s in R35C29, which forced R4C9=4; & the rest fell into place.
Dave |
|
Back to top |
|
|
PT
Joined: 30 Jun 2006 Posts: 2
|
Posted: Fri Jun 30, 2006 2:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
I am confused. How is it an x-wing? It is true that for c2 the 7 can only go in at r3 and r5, but for c9 it can go in at r3, r4, r5 and r6. If you look at row-wise, for r3 the 7 can go in c2, c6 and c9 while for r5 it can go in at c2, c7, and c9. There are too many cells for the usual definition of an x-wing unless there is a more general definition (not 4 corners of a rectangle).
I think the logic is as follows:
Either r1c3 7 or r1c7 7
If r1c3 7 -> r3c9 7
If r1c7 7 -> r3c2 7 -> r4c3 7
Either case r4c9 cannot be a 7.
Is there a way to solve the puzzle without using this step?
If not, does this mean the puzzles of this site have gone beyond the basic x-wing (4 corners of a rectangle)?
PT |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Charles
Joined: 31 Mar 2006 Posts: 8 Location: Lawton, Oklahoma, USA
|
Posted: Fri Jun 30, 2006 6:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
PT: I agree with you, there is no X-Wing on 7 at the positions described. Your obversation on the (1,7) pair is excellent and correct. I asked once before if this technique has a name - I didn't see a reply. I do remember this method being described and used in previous puzzles. Charles |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ravel
Joined: 21 Apr 2006 Posts: 536
|
Posted: Fri Jun 30, 2006 9:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
This is, where you have an x-wing in 7. In rows 3 and 5 there are only 2 places for 7 in the columns 2 and 9.
Since 7 cannot be in r2c8, in box 2 it must be in r2c5 or r2c6, therefore it cannot be in r3c6 (box/box elimination)
Code: | ---------------------
3 4 . | 8 . . | . 5 2
2 9 8 | 5 . . | 6 . 3
. x 5 | 2 3 . | 8 9 x
---------------------
. 8 . | . 1 . | 5 2 .
. x 2 | 9 8 5 | 3 . x
5 1 3 | . 2 . | . . .
---------------------
7 2 6 | . 5 . | . . .
8 5 4 | . . 2 | . 3 6
. 3 . | . . 8 | 2 7 5
---------------------
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
PT
Joined: 30 Jun 2006 Posts: 2
|
Posted: Fri Jun 30, 2006 3:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks, Ravel. Order has been restored.
I remembered reading in another thread that someone input a puzzle into the draw/play program to get a hint for the next move but the program could not do it. The explanation was that the most advanced logic the program has is the x-wing. Anything beyond x-wing the program cannot see. So when I could not see the x-wing I thought maybe the program has progressed to the point of being able to see unstructured (or amorphous) either-or scenarios like the one that I suggested. That would be a great accomplishment to program that into a computer. Alas, you dashed my hope :P
PT |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Charles
Joined: 31 Mar 2006 Posts: 8 Location: Lawton, Oklahoma, USA
|
Posted: Fri Jun 30, 2006 5:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ravel: Thanks for me too, I simply did not see the removal of 7 as a candidate in R3C6, thereby creating the X-Wing. Sometimes it seems we can look for so long that we create blind spots - this was certainly one for me. Thanks again, Charles |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marty R.
Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
|
Posted: Fri Jun 30, 2006 11:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I did it the same way as Dave, i.e., the X-Wing on "7" solved the whole puzzle. This was a disappointment compared to the June 27 puzzle, as I would like to see more of a challenge on puzzles with this rating. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|