View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Marty R.
Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
|
Posted: Wed Jun 28, 2006 4:51 pm Post subject: June 27, Very Hard |
|
|
From my perspective, this was the most enjoyable one I've seen, because it afforded the opportunity to use a few different techniques. There was a block interaction, a Type 4 rectangle and an X-Wing. Finally, coloring on "2" broke the puzzle open.
Thanks Sam, hope to see more like this one. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
marvwriter
Joined: 28 Jun 2006 Posts: 2 Location: Houston, Texas
|
Posted: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:47 pm Post subject: June 27 very hard |
|
|
I agree. It was very enjoyable and a real workout for the little gray cells. I used the block interaction, hidden pairs and 3 x-wings to solve it. (One of the x-wings I used was on the "2s.") |
|
Back to top |
|
|
frankp329
Joined: 29 Jun 2006 Posts: 1
|
Posted: Thu Jun 29, 2006 1:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
This is far as I got on this one. Please help I am new at this
- - 7 - - - - - -
4 9 6 - - 8 - - 3
- - 1 9 - - - - 6
- 4 3 - - 2 6 8 -
6 1 - 8 - 4 2 3 7
- 2 8 3 - - 5 - -
1 - - - - 3 4 - -
8 3 - 1 - - 9 7 2
- - - - - - 3 - - |
|
Back to top |
|
|
gigi
Joined: 04 Jun 2006 Posts: 5 Location: Central Texas
|
Posted: Thu Jun 29, 2006 1:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The only possible positions for 6 in boxes 5 and 8 is in cols 5 and 6 which forces a 6 in box 1 at row 1, col 4. That should get you going again! Good luck |
|
Back to top |
|
|
gigi
Joined: 04 Jun 2006 Posts: 5 Location: Central Texas
|
Posted: Thu Jun 29, 2006 2:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That should be.... it forces a 6 in Box 2 (not box 1) row 1, col 4 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
David
Joined: 02 Jun 2006 Posts: 58 Location: Bedford, UK
|
Posted: Thu Jun 29, 2006 4:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
?? I didn't see any X wing or UR, it just seemed to fall out (albeit slowly) from the normal techniques and logic. Did anyone else use the 'advanced' techniques ? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ravel
Joined: 21 Apr 2006 Posts: 536
|
Posted: Fri Jun 30, 2006 8:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hm, what gigi described can be looked at using either box/box interaction or x-wing. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Xantara
Joined: 05 Jun 2006 Posts: 7
|
Posted: Sun Jul 02, 2006 1:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hi all,
I had trouble cracking this one. So I checked out your discussion.
I had never used the x-wing solving technique. I studied your explanations and read some things out on the web as well. Very interesting.
I understood what I read okay and pored over some good examples.
But I couldn't find any place in the puzzle to apply the x-wing -- at least not at the juncture where I stalled out.
Because I was studying the numbers so long looking for x-wing patterns, I stumbled over traditional clues. And in the end, that's how I solved the puzzle.
So, in answer to David's query, no, I didn't use any advanced techniques either, but I arrived at the solution. Hurrah!
Xantara |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|