View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
pat1m
Joined: 17 Jul 2006 Posts: 6
|
Posted: Tue Aug 29, 2006 6:28 pm Post subject: Why a 7 there? |
|
|
I inputted the following puzzle into the Draw feature, when I got stuck. According to the hint, the next move would be a 7 in r3c5. Why a 7 there and not in r1c5? Would someone be able to explain?
This is what I had:
6.....3......9 | 25.....2478.........48 | ..58 ...1 .....78
7..145...14 | 6.......348.....13489 | 589 ..34 .....2
8..145.....2 | 59.....347.......1349 | ....6 ..34 ....79
__________________________________________
9......2......8 | 4........5...............6 | ...3......7......1
1......7......5 | 3........9...............2 | ...4......8......6
4......6......3 | 8........1...............7 | ...2......9......5
__________________________________________
2......9......6 | 1.......38.............38 | 7......5.......4
3....14....14 | 7..........6..............5 |89......2 ......89
5......8 .....7 | 29......24.............49 | 1......6.......3 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
AZ Matt
Joined: 03 Nov 2005 Posts: 63 Location: Hiding under my desk in Phoenix AZ USA
|
Posted: Tue Aug 29, 2006 9:02 pm Post subject: One way... |
|
|
I don't know if this is the fastest way to get to 7 in r3c5, pat1m, but it is the most obvious:
There is a type-1 unique rectangle in the r2c23/r8c23. r3c2 must be <5>, otherwise it could be a <1> or a <4>, and the puzzle would not be unique.
You'll get it from there...
Good luck.
Edit: Of course it occurs to me now that the draw hint would not give you the 7 for a clue if it took that route to get there. I will keep working...
Last edited by AZ Matt on Tue Aug 29, 2006 9:15 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marty R.
Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
|
Posted: Tue Aug 29, 2006 9:08 pm Post subject: Re: Why a 7 there? |
|
|
pat1m wrote: | I inputted the following puzzle into the Draw feature, when I got stuck. According to the hint, the next move would be a 7 in r3c5. Why a 7 there and not in r1c5? Would someone be able to explain?
This is what I had:
6.....3......9 | 25.....2478.........48 | ..58 ...1 .....78
7..145...14 | 6.......348.....13489 | 589 ..34 .....2
8..145.....2 | 59.....347.......1349 | ....6 ..34 ....79
__________________________________________
9......2......8 | 4........5...............6 | ...3......7......1
1......7......5 | 3........9...............2 | ...4......8......6
4......6......3 | 8........1...............7 | ...2......9......5
__________________________________________
2......9......6 | 1.......38.............38 | 7......5.......4
3....14....14 | 7..........6..............5 |89......2 ......89
5......8 .....7 | 29......24.............49 | 1......6.......3 |
Try this. If you look at row 1, the "4" must be in box 2, thus the "4" is eliminated from cells in rows 2 and 3 in box 2. There is now a naked pair, "38", in column 5 and those two numbers must be eliminated from all other cells in that column, leaving the "7" in r3c5. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
keith
Joined: 19 Sep 2005 Posts: 3355 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
|
Posted: Tue Aug 29, 2006 9:11 pm Post subject: Row box intersection |
|
|
Take a look at row 1. The <4> must be in box 2. So, you can take out all the candidates <4> that are in box 2 and rows 23.
This reveals a naked pair <38> in column 5. You have now eliminated <34> from R3C5. It must be <7>.
And, by the way: Did you notice the Unique rectangle in R28C23? R2C2 must be <5>.
Keith |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ravel
Joined: 21 Apr 2006 Posts: 536
|
Posted: Tue Aug 29, 2006 9:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Alternative:
In row 1 the 4 only can be in column 4 or 6, both in box 2. Therefore you can eliminate it from r23c56 (same box). This gives you the same naked pair 38 in r27c5 in column 5 => r3c5=7. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
keith
Joined: 19 Sep 2005 Posts: 3355 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
|
Posted: Tue Aug 29, 2006 9:28 pm Post subject: Unique Loop |
|
|
Ravel, and all,
You might enjoy this:
From the posted position, use the UR to set R2C2 = <5>.
Then you have a Type 4 unique loop: The three corners of the old UR and R23C6. This eliminates <4> from R23C6!
Keith |
|
Back to top |
|
|
AZ Matt
Joined: 03 Nov 2005 Posts: 63 Location: Hiding under my desk in Phoenix AZ USA
|
Posted: Wed Aug 30, 2006 7:17 pm Post subject: Unique Loop? |
|
|
I think I am missing your point, Keith. I see that the <4> must be in either r2c3 and r3c8, or r3c2 and r2c8, but in any event not in r2c56 nor r3c56. That doesn't appear to be what you are refering to.
What is a unique loop? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ravel
Joined: 21 Apr 2006 Posts: 536
|
Posted: Wed Aug 30, 2006 9:37 pm Post subject: Re: Unique Loop |
|
|
keith wrote: | From the posted position, use the UR to set R2C2 = <5>.
|
Nice, think this solves it. Dont know which unique loop you mean. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
keith
Joined: 19 Sep 2005 Posts: 3355 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
|
Posted: Wed Aug 30, 2006 10:54 pm Post subject: Unique Loop |
|
|
I apologize that my previous post has a sloppy explanation.
Here is the posted position:
Code: | +-------------------+-------------------+-------------------+
| 6 3 9 | 25 2478 48 | 58 1 78 |
| 7 145 14 | 6 348 13489 | 589 34 2 |
| 8 145 2 | 59 347 1349 | 6 34 79 |
+-------------------+-------------------+-------------------+
| 9 2 8 | 4 5 6 | 3 7 1 |
| 1 7 5 | 3 9 2 | 4 8 6 |
| 4 6 3 | 8 1 7 | 2 9 5 |
+-------------------+-------------------+-------------------+
| 2 9 6 | 1 38 38 | 7 5 4 |
| 3 14 14 | 7 6 5 | 89 2 89 |
| 5 8 7 | 29 24 49 | 1 6 3 |
+-------------------+-------------------+-------------------+ |
If you use the UR to set R2C2 = <5>, you then have another possible deadly pattern on <14>. Here it is:
Code: | +--------+--------+-------+
| . . . | . . . | . . . |
| . . 14| . . 14x| . . . |
| . 14 . | . . 14y| . . . |
+--------+--------+-------+
| . . . | . . . | . . . |
| . . . | . . . | . . . |
| . . . | . . . | . . . |
+--------+--------+-------+
| . . . | . . . | . . . |
| . 14 14| . . . | . . . |
| . . . | . . . | . . . |
+--------+--------+-------+ | Since one of R23C6 must be <1> (strong link), neither of them can be 4.
This is just an observation. In this puzzle, it is a ridiculously complicated way to make an elimination which is of little use.
In a post some time ago, Ravel pointed out the same pattern, laid out like this:
Code: | +-------+-------+-------+
| . x . | . . . | . x . |
| . x . | . x . | . . . |
| . . . | . x . | . x . |
+-------+-------+-------+ |
Technically, this is known as a "Unique Swordfishy Thingy".
Keith |
|
Back to top |
|
|
AZ Matt
Joined: 03 Nov 2005 Posts: 63 Location: Hiding under my desk in Phoenix AZ USA
|
Posted: Thu Aug 31, 2006 4:02 pm Post subject: Sweet... |
|
|
Thanks Keith. In the future, I think anytime we see a "super-advanced" solving technique in a puzzle, we should report it, whether it it is necessary to the puzzle or not. I am constantly making puzzles more difficult than they need to be simply because I get bored with the usual stuff, and I wouldn't have it any other way... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
pat1m
Joined: 17 Jul 2006 Posts: 6
|
Posted: Thu Aug 31, 2006 9:49 pm Post subject: Why the 7 |
|
|
Thank you all. I see the reasoning for the 7 now. I should have caught the row 1, box 2 4's thing. Thanks again. I didn't realize the rectangle 145 14 14 14 box, but now I can add that to the methods to try to solve puzzles |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|