View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
David
Joined: 02 Jun 2006 Posts: 58 Location: Bedford, UK
|
Posted: Thu Sep 21, 2006 4:59 pm Post subject: September 18th Very Hard |
|
|
It seems very quiet on the board at the moment so perhaps I can clutter it up with comment on the last v hard puzzle.
I had quite a bit of difficulty spotting the X wing on 3's. I filled in 9 numbers using 'easy' techniques, but the X wing eluded me - too many candidates to deal with. Anyway, giving up my X wing spotting, I thought I would try 'strong links'. Eventually I saw one on 3's using c 9, r2,9 and r 3, c5,7. This allows (I think) elimination of the 3 (leaving a 7) in the cell at r9 c5. As I started to remove the other 7's from c5 I spotted the X wing using half of my 'strong link' pattern and cursed myself for missing something so obvious.
Anyway, is the 'strong link' pattern also referred to as a kite ? or is it a turbot fish ? I am slowly starting to become familiar with other 'advanced' techniques, but the terminology is very confusing when you read comments on other Sudoku boards. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marty R.
Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
|
Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 5:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
In that puzzle, I used a Type 4 rectangle on 15, then the X-Wing on "3" solved the puzzle.
Quote: | I had quite a bit of difficulty spotting the X wing on 3's. |
It is rare that I can "spot" an X-Wing; I have to do it methodically. When I've exhausted other possibilities and have to start looking for X-Wings, I start in row 1 looking for strong links. Each time I find one, I write the number down outside the grid and scan the other rows to see if the same strong link exists in the same two columns for the X-Wing.
After I've done all nine rows, I then look at the rows with the same strong links to see if the strong link (fork or skyscraper) technique can be used to eliminate candidates. Then, if need be, I repeat the procedure with columns. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ravel
Joined: 21 Apr 2006 Posts: 536
|
Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 8:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
Code: | 37 135 1257 | 6 #2357 579 | 4 #239 8
48 345 2578 | 39 1 579 |#2379 6 c23
9 6 27 | 4 a237 8 |a237 5 1
-----------------------------------------------------
6 7 3 | 8 49 2 | 19 149 5
2 49 89 | 5 6 1 | 38 348 7
48 15 15 | 7 49 3 | 6 2489 24
-----------------------------------------------------
1 8 4 | 2 b35 6 |b35 7 9
37 2 79 | 139 8 459 |#135 #134 6
5 39 6 | 139 #37 479 |#1238 #12348 c234
| Alternatively to using the x-wing the 3 in r9c5 can be eliminated with 2 strong links, which is (essentially) the same as a turbot fish:
r3c5-r3c7,r2c9-r9c9 (either r3c5 or r9c9 must be 3).
You also can use 3 strong links ("Advanced coloring" is the same as n strong links):
r3c5-r3c7,r2c9-r9c9,r7c7-r7c5 (either r3c5 or r7c5 must be 3 - eliminates 3 in r1c5,r9c5).
An x-wing is a special case of 2 strong links, e.g. r3c7-r3c5,r7c5-r7c7 eliminates 3 in r289c7.
With the 3 strong links r3c7-r3c5,r7c5-r7c7,r9c9-r2c9 you could eliminate the 2 marked 3's in box 3.
Using another order (starting with r3c7 to r9c9) those in box 9.
I dont remember, what Havard called a kite. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
David
Joined: 02 Jun 2006 Posts: 58 Location: Bedford, UK
|
Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 4:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | Alternatively to using the x-wing the 3 in r9c5 can be eliminated with 2 strong links, which is (essentially) the same as a turbot fish:
r3c5-r3c7,r2c9-r9c9 (either r3c5 or r9c9 must be 3).
Hi Ravel
This is what I used, but you answered my question in naming it a 'turbot fish'. I have never seen 3 strong links used together so I will study your solution here. |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
TKiel
Joined: 22 Feb 2006 Posts: 292 Location: Kalamazoo, MI
|
Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 12:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
David,
This thread contains some examples and real life puzzles where three strong link chains were used together. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
David
Joined: 02 Jun 2006 Posts: 58 Location: Bedford, UK
|
Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 3:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi Tracey
Thanks for the pointer I will look it up. The more examples, the easier it is to check you have understood it correctly. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|