View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
kowloon
Joined: 28 Sep 2006 Posts: 3
|
Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 12:06 pm Post subject: What's the logic behind remote naked pairs |
|
|
I thought I understood it once but now I can't figure it out. What is the logic behind remote naked pairs? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
David Bryant
Joined: 29 Jul 2005 Posts: 559 Location: Denver, Colorado
|
Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 3:02 pm Post subject: It depends ... |
|
|
Hi, Kowloon!
I'm not certain I understand your question, but maybe this is what you're asking about.
Code: | 46+ . . . . . * . .
. . . . . . . . .
. . 46- . . . . . *
. . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . 46+
. . 46+ . . . 46- . .
. 46- . . . . . . . |
In this made-up example, the linked pairs {4, 6} form a chain through the puzzle -- we call these "remote pairs". In this example we can reason as follows.
r1c1 = 4 ==> r3c3 = 6 ==> r8c3 = 4 ==> r8c7 = 6 ==> r7c9 = 4
r1c1 = 6 ==> r3c3 = 4 ==> r8c3 = 6 ==> r8c7 = 4 ==> r7c9 = 6
So there's either a "4" at r1c1, and a "6" at r8c7, or else there's a "6" at r1c1, and a "4" at r8c7. Either way there cannot possibly be either a "4" or a "6" at r1c7. We can use similar reasoning to eliminate the possibility of either "4" or "6" at r3c9.
I hope that answers your question. dcb |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kowloon
Joined: 28 Sep 2006 Posts: 3
|
Posted: Sat Oct 07, 2006 3:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
I see now. I thought it was something different which is why it didn't make sense. Thanks for the explanation. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|