View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
storm_norm
Joined: 18 Oct 2007 Posts: 1741
|
Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2007 5:52 am Post subject: Nov 24 VH |
|
|
sadly, no finned x-wings. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marty R.
Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
|
Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2007 6:24 am Post subject: Re: Nov 24 VH |
|
|
storm_norm wrote: | sadly, no finned x-wings. |
That doesn't particularly sadden me, as I hate looking for them.
A UR, XY-Wing, W-Wing and another UR did it for me. Both URs were of the Type 1 variety. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
storm_norm
Joined: 18 Oct 2007 Posts: 1741
|
Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2007 6:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
Marty,
did you find that after basics the grid looks like a BUG+2? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
keith
Joined: 19 Sep 2005 Posts: 3355 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
|
Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2007 8:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
The basics get you to here:
Code: | +-------------+-------------+-------------+
| 2 7 19 | 45 8 6 | 59 14 3 |
| 15 459 8 | 3 7 2 | 59 14 6 |
| 3 45 6 | 45 9 1 | 7 8 2 |
+-------------+-------------+-------------+
| 7 1 5 | 2 4 3 | 8 6 9 |
| 9 6 2 | 18 15 578 | 4 3 57 |
| 8 3 4 | 9 6 57 | 1 2 57 |
+-------------+-------------+-------------+
| 4 8 7 | 6 2 9 | 3 5 1 |
| 15 2 3 | 7 15 4 | 6 9 8 |
| 6 59 19 | 18 3 58 | 2 7 4 |
+-------------+-------------+-------------+ |
and the very obvious UR solves R5C6 is <8> and the entire puzzle.
If you don't use the UR, there are a couple of XY-wings to choose from.
And, yes: This is a BUG+2. One of the tri-value cells must be <5>. I don't immediately see how this helps to solve the puzzle.
Keith |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Johan
Joined: 25 Jun 2007 Posts: 206 Location: Bornem Belgium
|
Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2007 9:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
The [45-459-59] XYZ-wing, eliminating <5> in R2C1 is also an alternative
way to solve the puzzle. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nataraj
Joined: 03 Aug 2007 Posts: 1048 Location: near Vienna, Austria
|
Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2007 1:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
slept in today.
already time for lunch.
finally...
great, a "very hard"
basics solve the puzzle?
no, not quite.
there's an obvious UR.
Solves the puzzle.
was about to post.
see keith's post.
my position exactly.
well, well...
edit: and, yes. Not to sound xx or anything, but I do prefer the
very-er hards
Did a "hard" today in the local paper took me longer than this one. Hm |
|
Back to top |
|
|
cgordon
Joined: 04 May 2007 Posts: 769 Location: ontario, canada
|
Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2007 1:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I didn't get as far as Keith with the basics so I had an extra <8> in R5C9. But this made it a Type 2 UR (I think) which knocked out the <8> in R5C4. That's all it needed. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marty R.
Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
|
Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2007 4:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
storm_norm wrote: | Marty,
did you find that after basics the grid looks like a BUG+2? |
Norm, I really don't remember, but I suspect the answer is "no", because if it did I probably would've solved it with fewer moves than I did. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Earl
Joined: 30 May 2007 Posts: 677 Location: Victoria, KS
|
Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2007 7:15 pm Post subject: Nov 24 VH |
|
|
From Keith's grid there is a simple xy-wing pivoted at R1C3 which finishes the puzzle. But you had to be alert to reach Keith's grid.
Earl |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marty R.
Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
|
Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2007 8:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | From Keith's grid there is a simple xy-wing pivoted at R1C3 which finishes the puzzle. |
An alternative way to make the same move is to use the W-Wing on 59 which is connected by the 9s in column 3. The pincer 5s do not eliminate anything though. But if you color the 5s from r2c9-->r1c8-->r1c2, you then end up with the same pincers as the XY-Wing. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
keith
Joined: 19 Sep 2005 Posts: 3355 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
|
Posted: Sat Nov 24, 2007 9:01 pm Post subject: Re: Nov 24 VH |
|
|
Earl wrote: | But you had to be alert to reach Keith's grid. |
Actually, not really. This puzzle is a great example of why you should not fill in all the pencil marks. I work without an PM's as long as I can, then I put PM's only in cells that have two candidates.
Eventually you may have to fill in all the PM's, but in the early stages of a puzzle I try to see the patterns in the solved cells, not in the PM's.
If you'd like to practice recognizing pairs and triples by looking at the solved cells, try the the hardest "fiendish" puzzles at Fiendish Sudoku.
http://www.fiendishsudoku.com/sudoku.html
These don't require much more than the occasional X-wing, but if you start by filling in all the PM's, they'll drive you crazy.
Keith |
|
Back to top |
|
|
andras
Joined: 31 Oct 2007 Posts: 56 Location: Mid Wales
|
Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2007 7:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
Just the simple xy-wing was all I saw, followed by the complete collapse of the puzzle; it was easy to spot because there weren't a lot of unsolved cells left at that stage.
Not a very hard VH, I thought, but a very satisfying one.
John |
|
Back to top |
|
|
re'born
Joined: 28 Oct 2007 Posts: 80
|
Posted: Sun Nov 25, 2007 1:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
keith wrote: | The basics get you to here:
Code: | +-------------+-------------+-------------+
| 2 7 19 | 45 8 6 | 59 14 3 |
| 15 459 8 | 3 7 2 | 59 14 6 |
| 3 45 6 | 45 9 1 | 7 8 2 |
+-------------+-------------+-------------+
| 7 1 5 | 2 4 3 | 8 6 9 |
| 9 6 2 | 18 15 578 | 4 3 57 |
| 8 3 4 | 9 6 57 | 1 2 57 |
+-------------+-------------+-------------+
| 4 8 7 | 6 2 9 | 3 5 1 |
| 15 2 3 | 7 15 4 | 6 9 8 |
| 6 59 19 | 18 3 58 | 2 7 4 |
+-------------+-------------+-------------+ |
And, yes: This is a BUG+2. One of the tri-value cells must be <5>. I don't immediately see how this helps to solve the puzzle.
|
If r3c2=5, then r9c2<>5 and hence r9c6=5. This kills both BUG candidates and so r3c2<>5, solving the puzzle. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DennyOR
Joined: 12 Sep 2007 Posts: 33 Location: Portland, Oregon
|
Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2007 8:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
From Keith's position a 15-54-45-54-41 xy chain solved it for me. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|