View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
ravel
Joined: 21 Apr 2006 Posts: 536
|
Posted: Mon Dec 17, 2007 3:06 pm Post subject: Another wapati "Sue de coq" |
|
|
Code: | . . .|. . 8|. 4 .
. . .|5 3 .|. . 9
. . .|. . .|. 6 5
-----+-----+-----
. 9 .|4 . 7|2 . 3
. 7 .|. 5 .|. . .
2 . .|8 . .|. 1 .
-----+-----+-----
. . .|2 . .|. . .
6 . 8|. . 1|. . .
. 2 1|9 . .|. . 4
| This time a Sue (at least i think it is one) is there from the beginning. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Asellus
Joined: 05 Jun 2007 Posts: 865 Location: Sonoma County, CA, USA
|
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 5:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
It took me quite a while to spot that sneaky Sue (de Coq), but I finally did. However, I won't give it away. It is in the grid below, but not marked in any way.
Meanwhile, I found a couple of other interesting things. Here, I believe, is the grid after basics:
Code: | +----------------------+-------------------+------------------+
| 3579 1356 235679 |t167 12679 8 | 137 4 127 |
|b47 #1-468 2467 | 5 3 u46 | 178 278 9 |
| 3479 #13-48 23479 |s17 12479 @49 | 1378 6 5 |
+----------------------+-------------------+------------------+
| 18 9 56 | 4 16 7 | 2 58 3 |
| 18 7 346 |k136 5 2 | 4689 89 68 |
| 2 3456 3456 | 8 69 j369 | 4567 1 67 |
+----------------------+-------------------+------------------+
| 34579 a345 34579 | 2 4678 3456 | 15678 3578 1678 |
| 6 a345 8 |r37 47 1 | 579 23579 27 |
|a357 2 1 | 9 678 356 | 5678 3578 4 |
+----------------------+-------------------+------------------+ |
First, there is a nice ALS elimination in the left tower: a 3-cell {3457} ALS marked "a" and a bivalue ALS "b". The shared exclusive is <7>. The shared common <4> eliminates <4>s in the cells marked #.
Then, I was noticing the strongly linked <3>s in Box 5, marked "j" and "k", each part of an ALS. Thinking that might lead somewhere, I pursued it a bit. Turns out that those {136} and {369} ALS's weren't the interesting bit. Instead, I noticed that if "j" is true, then @ must be <9>. However, if "k" is true, then you can follow the sequence of cells marked r-s-t-u and see that @ must also be <9>. So, <9> it is. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Asellus
Joined: 05 Jun 2007 Posts: 865 Location: Sonoma County, CA, USA
|
Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 5:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
PS: I will give a clue about that Sue de Coq, for those interested but needing such a clue...
It is one of those Sue de Coq situations where the shared cells also contain a locked candidate. That makes it more difficult to spot. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|