View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
keith
Joined: 19 Sep 2005 Posts: 3355 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
|
Posted: Sat Jan 05, 2008 7:58 pm Post subject: Stumped again! |
|
|
I've stared at this one for hours, it seems. Any suggestions?
Thank you in advance,
Keith
Code: | Puzzle: M5459715sh(21)
+-------+-------+-------+
| . 7 1 | 6 . . | 8 2 . |
| . . . | . . 2 | . . . |
| 2 9 . | . . . | . 4 3 |
+-------+-------+-------+
| . 1 9 | . . 8 | . . . |
| 4 . . | . 5 . | . . 7 |
| . . . | 9 . . | 1 8 . |
+-------+-------+-------+
| 1 4 . | . . . | . 7 9 |
| . . . | . . 5 | . . . |
| . 3 7 | 2 . . | 4 6 . |
+-------+-------+-------+
|
Here is where I am stuck, after an XYZ-wing:
Code: | +-------------------+-------------------+-------------------+
| 3 7 1 | 6 49 49 | 8 2 5 |
| 8 56 4 | 357 37 2 | 679 19 16 |
| 2 9 56 | 1578 178 17 | 67 4 3 |
+-------------------+-------------------+-------------------+
| 67 1 9 | 347 23467 8 | 236 5 246 |
| 4 28 38 | 13 5 136 | 2369 39 7 |
| 67 25 35 | 9 23467 467 | 1 8 246 |
+-------------------+-------------------+-------------------+
| 1 4 2 | 38 368 36 | 5 7 9 |
| 9 68 68 | 47 47 5 | 23 13 12 |
| 5 3 7 | 2 19 19 | 4 6 8 |
+-------------------+-------------------+-------------------+
|
I see a flightless W-wing, XYZ-wing, and two XY-wings. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
keith
Joined: 19 Sep 2005 Posts: 3355 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
|
Posted: Sat Jan 05, 2008 8:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well, I found that the two XY-wings are linked, and you can make a couple of eliminations that solve R5C4 as <1>. Revealing a W-wing that takes out <7> in R46C5.
Then
Working ...
Keith |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Johan
Joined: 25 Jun 2007 Posts: 206 Location: Bornem Belgium
|
Posted: Sat Jan 05, 2008 10:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There is a 4-cell xy-chain with pincer ends in R8C9 and R6C2, that takes out <2> in R6C9, that results in a naked [467] triple in R6. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
storm_norm
Joined: 18 Oct 2007 Posts: 1741
|
Posted: Sat Jan 05, 2008 11:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Code: | +-------------------+-------------------+-------------------+
| 3 7 1 | 6 49 49 | 8 2 5 |
| 8 56 4 | 357 37 2 | 679 19 16 |
| 2 9 56 | 578 178 17 | 67 4 3 |
+-------------------+-------------------+-------------------+
| 67 1 9 | 347 2346 8 | (2)36 5 g246 |
| 4 G28 38 | 13 5 36 | R2369 39 7 |
| 67 R25 35 | 9 23 47 | 1 8 46 |
+-------------------+-------------------+-------------------+
| 1 4 2 | 38 368 36 | 5 7 9 |
| 9 68 68 | 47 47 5 | g23 13 1r2 |
| 5 3 7 | 2 19 19 | 4 6 8 |
+-------------------+-------------------+-------------------+
|
after Johan's elimination you can kill the 2 in r4c7 by multicoloring. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
keith
Joined: 19 Sep 2005 Posts: 3355 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
|
Posted: Sat Jan 05, 2008 11:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
storm_norm wrote: | after Johan's elimination you can kill the 2 in r4c7 by multicoloring. |
norm,
That is not correct. In fact, R4C7 is <2> in the solution.
Each leg of the multicoloring needs to have an even number of cells, which is also an odd number of links.
Johan,
How do you find XY-chains? I see your elimination, but I would never have found it myself. Clearly, I have something to learn.
I think we are here:
Code: | +----------------+----------------+----------------+
| 3 7 1 | 6 49 49 | 8 2 5 |
| 8 56 4 | 357 37 2 | 679 19 16 |
| 2 9 56 | 578 178 17 | 67 4 3 |
+----------------+----------------+----------------+
| 67 1 9 | 347 2346 8 | 236 5 246 |
| 4 28 38 | 1 5 36 | 2369 39 7 |
| 67 25 35 | 9 23 47 | 1 8 46 |
+----------------+----------------+----------------+
| 1 4 2 | 38 368 36 | 5 7 9 |
| 9 68 68 | 47 47 5 | 23 13 12 |
| 5 3 7 | 2 19 19 | 4 6 8 |
+----------------+----------------+----------------+ |
Keith |
|
Back to top |
|
|
storm_norm
Joined: 18 Oct 2007 Posts: 1741
|
Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 12:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
sorry keith I thought i saw something that actually isn't there. everyone ignore my post.
xy-chains - very hard to look for because they don't actually involve just one candidate, they can involve many candidates. its actually a powerful technique when you have many bi-value cells. xy-chains exploit bi-value cells.
an xy-wing is the simplest xy-chain.
the ends of the xy-chain act the same as the pincers in an xy-wing.
I know there are very good examples of xy-chains out there, but most are very hard to illustrate if you create it from scratch. the xy-chain that johan used is a nice example.
r6c9 is not a 2 if:
r8c9=1 then r2c9=6 then r2c2=5 then r6c2=2
and !! that 2 has to be there on the other end going the other way
r6c2=5 then r2c2=6 then r2c9=1 then r8c9=2
since there is a two on both ends, any {2} those ends see can be eliminated.
most people show this as johan did by describing the end cells, but might also list the combinations: 12-16-56-25... the 2 on both ends can see the r6c9 cell. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
storm_norm
Joined: 18 Oct 2007 Posts: 1741
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Johan
Joined: 25 Jun 2007 Posts: 206 Location: Bornem Belgium
|
Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 2:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | How do you find XY-chains? I see your elimination, but I would never have found it myself. Clearly, I have something to learn.
|
Keith,
This is one of the advanced steps that i first learned, I've more trouble finding an x-wing than an xy-chain, but for finding those chains I use a simple
method, when I use the first digit(x) of a bivalue cell, I mark the other bivalue cells( I'm a P&P solver) which contain digit y,then I look if the both
cells(x and y) can see an y digit( pincer effect)
Now there is another one in R8C7, using digit <3>(x) you must find bivalue cells that contains an y digit(2), two of them <28>,<25> are in Box 4 and another
one <23> is in Box 5, but only one has a pincer effect,then i'll try to find me a way through the bivalue cells to end up in R5C2, eliminating <2> in R5C7.
[23-31-19-93-38-82] |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Victor
Joined: 29 Sep 2005 Posts: 207 Location: NI
|
Posted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 12:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
For a change, I did a puzzle quite quickly - luck of the draw I guess. I've been inspired by the way in which Steve & others can build chains from a couple of conjugate links. Here it is:
R5C7 ≠ 2 ==> R5C2 = 2 ==> R6C2 = 5 ==> now just an XY-chain that ends ==> R8C9 = 2.
Since as with any AIC you can reverse this (i.e. R8C9 ≠ 2 ==> R5C7 = 2), we can eliminate the 2 in R8C7. And, perhaps surprisingly, that's it - not another non-basic move needed. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|