View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
keith
Joined: 19 Sep 2005 Posts: 3355 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
|
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 9:07 pm Post subject: And, I thought it was over ... |
|
|
I thought I had this one solved, then found another sticking place at the end.
Code: | Puzzle: M3937606sh(8)
+-------+-------+-------+
| 7 . . | . . 2 | . . 1 |
| . . 3 | . 7 8 | 2 . . |
| . 2 . | 1 6 9 | . 5 . |
+-------+-------+-------+
| . 1 . | . . . | 8 9 . |
| 2 . . | . . . | . . 3 |
| . 4 5 | . . . | . 7 . |
+-------+-------+-------+
| . 8 . | 7 3 4 | . 2 . |
| . . 2 | . 8 6 | 7 . . |
| 4 . . | . . 1 | . . 8 |
+-------+-------+-------+ |
Highly recommended!
Keith |
|
Back to top |
|
|
keith
Joined: 19 Sep 2005 Posts: 3355 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
|
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 9:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Looking anew at that sticking place: I suppose I'm just not a city boy! (But I am unique.)
Keith |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nataraj
Joined: 03 Aug 2007 Posts: 1048 Location: near Vienna, Austria
|
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 9:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Skyscraper (9),
Quote: | I thought I had this one solved, |
but ... this position
Code: | +--------------------------+--------------------------+--------------------------+
| 7 69 69 | 3 5 2 | 4 8 1 |
| 1 5 3 | 4 7 8 | 2 6 9 |
| 8 2 4 | 1 6 9 | 3 5 7 |
+--------------------------+--------------------------+--------------------------+
| 3 1 67 | 2 4 57 | 8 9 56 |
| 2 79 8 | 6 19 57 | 15 4 3 |
| 69 4 5 | 8 19 3 | 16 7 2 |
+--------------------------+--------------------------+--------------------------+
| 569 8 1 | 7 3 4 | 569 2 56 |
| 59 3 2 | 59 8 6 | 7 1 4 |
| 4 679 679 | 59 2 1 | 569 3 8 |
+--------------------------+--------------------------+--------------------------+ |
needs another coloring scheme (removes 6 from r4c3, r6c7, r7c1, r7c9) to solve.
Guess I AM a city boy
but nothing unique with that (the 7 in row 9 spoils the fun regardless)
___
talking about city/non-city boys: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QorkFwpOo6E |
|
Back to top |
|
|
keith
Joined: 19 Sep 2005 Posts: 3355 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
|
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 10:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
nataraj wrote: | Skyscraper (9),
Quote: | I thought I had this one solved, |
but ... this position
Code: | +--------------------------+--------------------------+--------------------------+
| 7 69 69 | 3 5 2 | 4 8 1 |
| 1 5 3 | 4 7 8 | 2 6 9 |
| 8 2 4 | 1 6 9 | 3 5 7 |
+--------------------------+--------------------------+--------------------------+
| 3 1 67 | 2 4 57 | 8 9 56 |
| 2 79 8 | 6 19 57 | 15 4 3 |
| 69 4 5 | 8 19 3 | 16 7 2 |
+--------------------------+--------------------------+--------------------------+
| 569 8 1 | 7 3 4 | 569 2 56 |
| 59 3 2 | 59 8 6 | 7 1 4 |
| 4 679 679 | 59 2 1 | 569 3 8 |
+--------------------------+--------------------------+--------------------------+ |
needs another coloring scheme (removes 6 from r4c3, r6c7, r7c1, r7c9) to solve.
Guess I AM a city boy
but nothing unique with that (the 7 in row 9 spoils the fun regardless)
___
talking about city/non-city boys: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QorkFwpOo6E |
I must be VERY NOT a city boy. If you see the XY-wing that takes out <6> in R1C3, (which does not matter hereafter) you reach the position I did, but I had used no skyscrapers. I did use a hard-to-spot W-wing, plus two XY-wings, one of which I mention above.
Then, there are three columns (two skyscrapers) that take out <6> in R79C7, solving the puzzle.
But, in Nataraj' grid above is the unique swordfish: <59> in C147. To avoid the DP, R7C9 cannot be <6>.
Keith |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nataraj
Joined: 03 Aug 2007 Posts: 1048 Location: near Vienna, Austria
|
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 10:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
keith wrote: |
But, in Nataraj' grid above is the unique swordfish: <59> in C147. To avoid the DP, R7C9 cannot be <6>.
|
That's interesting! Could you please elaborate, Keith? I have the feeling I am about to learn an important lesson. More specifically, unique swordfish? I assume you refer to the pattern of {59} in r78c1, r89c4 and r79c7, but how can removing the extra 6 spoil the deadly pattern? Pls forgive me for being tense - as you must have realized by now, uniqueness arguments are among my many weak points. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
keith
Joined: 19 Sep 2005 Posts: 3355 Location: near Detroit, Michigan, USA
|
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 11:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nataraj,
Here is my position:
Code: | +-------------+-------------+-------------+
| 7 6 9 | 3 5 2 | 4 8 1 |
| 1 5 3 | 4 7 8 | 2 6 9 |
| 8 2 4 | 1 6 9 | 3 5 7 |
+-------------+-------------+-------------+
| 3 1 67 | 2 4 57 | 8 9 56 |
| 2 79 8 | 6 19 57 | 15 4 3 |
| 69 4 5 | 8 19 3 | 16 7 2 |
+-------------+-------------+-------------+
|#569 8 1 | 7 3 4 |#569 2 56 |
|#59 3 2 |#59 8 6 | 7 1 4 |
| 4 79 67 |#59 2 1 |#569 3 8 |
+-------------+-------------+-------------+
|
The cells # are a "unique swordfish" in that that they are laid out like a swordfish, and <59> in each is a deadly pattern (DP).
To avoid the DP, one of R7C1, R7C7, and R9C7 must be <6>. They all have a common peer (shared buddy): R7C9 cannot be <6>.
(My first explanation was deliberately vague, not to spoil the fun for others.)
And, by the way, I was really surprised to get stuck when I thought the puzzle was solved, and presumed only singles remained.
Keith |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Marty R.
Joined: 12 Feb 2006 Posts: 5770 Location: Rochester, NY, USA
|
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 12:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
One W-Wing, an XY-Wing and two ERs. In the above grid the ERI on 6 is in r6c3 and it takes out the 6 from r6c7.
Very nice work on that unique swordfish. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nataraj
Joined: 03 Aug 2007 Posts: 1048 Location: near Vienna, Austria
|
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 7:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks, keith ! I see it clearly now how that works. Maybe next time I'll be able to figure it out myself.
nataraj wrote: | but how can removing the extra 6 spoil the deadly pattern? |
Somehow my brain made me look at the 6 in r7c6 all the time instead of r7c9. Couldn't figure out how you could remove that. Should have read your post properly. Well, it was close to midnight ... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
storm_norm
Joined: 18 Oct 2007 Posts: 1741
|
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 10:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
keith,
that is pretty sweet. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|