View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Asellus
Joined: 05 Jun 2007 Posts: 865 Location: Sonoma County, CA, USA
|
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2007 2:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
Tracy wrote: | Are you saying that in all cases the end cells of an XY-wing are conjugate pairs? |
My bad!!
The <2>s on the end of an XY Wing have a "strong inferential" link (at least one is true). So, the coloring logic IS the same as discussed elsewhere for the W-Wing.
So, I was, in part, lucky. But not entirely... there is still a sort of "wrap" in this case. Let me revise my grid:
Code: | *--------------------------------------------------*
| 2R3 -26 8 | 4 236 5 | 1 9 7 |
| 257 67 9 | 1 26 8 | 2r5 4 3 |
| 1 4 35 | 27 237 9 | 6 2g5 8 |
|----------------+----------------+----------------|
|-2r5 1 7 | 9 8 4 | 2g5 3 6 |
| 9 2g5 6 | 3 1 7 | 8 2r5 4 |
| 8 3 4 | 6 5 2 | 7 1 9 |
|----------------+----------------+----------------|
| 37 79 2 | 5 49 6 | 34 8 1 |
| 6 59 35 | 8 49 1 | 34 7 2 |
| 4 8 1 | 27 27 3 | 9 6 5 |
*--------------------------------------------------* |
I have used "R" and "g" for the strong inferential link of the XY Wing. Eliminations occur between "R" and "g". (Because there is no R-G color chain in this case, we don't have to worry about the fact that "G" and "r" do not produce eliminations.)
The R-g pair in R1C1 and R5C2 causes two eliminations, R1C2 and R4C1, as shown. However, the <2> in R4C1 is colored "r", so all "r" <2>s are eliminated as the chain collapses. It is still a sort of color "wrap." It's just that one can't say that "R" <2>s are eliminated as well ... as I mistakenly did earlier.
I hasten to add that it's not necessary to consider this as some new sort of "wrap" technique. The color chain will collapse naturally if such an elimination occurs. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|